본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선 초 道流僧의 역할과 그 사상사적 의미

The Role of Doryu-seung(道流僧) in the Early Joseon Period and its Meaning in the History of Ideas

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this paper, I looked at one aspect of the consilience of Taoism and Buddhism in the healing culture of the Goryeo Dynasty by clarifying the categories of Doryu-seung(道流僧) that appeared in historical materials in the early Joseon Dynasty and examining their origins. Doryu-seung is a word that combines Doryu(道流), which means a Taoist, and Seung, a Buddhist monk. It was an expression that refers to a Buddhist monk who uses a Taoist method. They were mainly mobilized for royal therapy work. The representative Taoist method used by Doryu-seung is Dungap(遁甲, dun jia), which was used to move patients to the beneficial location for healing or hiding patients from diseases. Dungap is a technique based on the five elements of yin(陰) and yang(陽), and during the Joseon Dynasty, it was understood as a technique in the realm of Taoism. For this reason, monks who use Dungap were referred to as Doryu-seung. Doryu-seung shows similarities in activities and roles with a Chongji-jong(摠持宗) monk of Milwon(密員). The origin of Doryu-seung in the early Joseon Dynasty was found in the Jugeum(呪禁, zhou jin) culture of Goryeo and the activities of Chongji-jong, which continued until the early Joseon Dynasty. The monks of the Chongji-jong carried out treatment activities for the public with Jugeum, daily exorcism and Dungap, and I think this is why they used to be called as Doryu-seung. Meanwhile, Doryu-seung was also understood to be the same category as Maeng-seung(盲僧, blind monk) or the blind fortune teller. I think there is some confusion. Maeng-seung combined Taoist and Buddhist rituals since the Goryeo Dynasty, and blind fortune tellers who was called a “Seonsa(禪師)” in the Joseon Dynasty read both Taoist and Buddhist scriptures. It seems to have been misunderstood Doryu-seung as Maeng-seung or the blind fortune teller because of the combination of Taoism and Buddhism.

Abstract

In this paper, I looked at one aspect of the consilience of Taoism and Buddhism in the healing culture of the Goryeo Dynasty by clarifying the categories of Doryu-seung(道流僧) that appeared in historical materials in the early Joseon Dynasty and examining their origins. Doryu-seung is a word that combines Doryu(道流), which means a Taoist, and Seung, a Buddhist monk. It was an expression that refers to a Buddhist monk who uses a Taoist method. They were mainly mobilized for royal therapy work. The representative Taoist method used by Doryu-seung is Dungap(遁甲, dun jia), which was used to move patients to the beneficial location for healing or hiding patients from diseases. Dungap is a technique based on the five elements of yin(陰) and yang(陽), and during the Joseon Dynasty, it was understood as a technique in the realm of Taoism. For this reason, monks who use Dungap were referred to as Doryu-seung. Doryu-seung shows similarities in activities and roles with a Chongji-jong(摠持宗) monk of Milwon(密員). The origin of Doryu-seung in the early Joseon Dynasty was found in the Jugeum(呪禁, zhou jin) culture of Goryeo and the activities of Chongji-jong, which continued until the early Joseon Dynasty. The monks of the Chongji-jong carried out treatment activities for the public with Jugeum, daily exorcism and Dungap, and I think this is why they used to be called as Doryu-seung. Meanwhile, Doryu-seung was also understood to be the same category as Maeng-seung(盲僧, blind monk) or the blind fortune teller. I think there is some confusion. Maeng-seung combined Taoist and Buddhist rituals since the Goryeo Dynasty, and blind fortune tellers who was called a “Seonsa(禪師)” in the Joseon Dynasty read both Taoist and Buddhist scriptures. It seems to have been misunderstood Doryu-seung as Maeng-seung or the blind fortune teller because of the combination of Taoism and Buddhism.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. "高麗史", ~
  2. "高麗史節要", ~
  3. "太祖實錄", ~
  4. "定宗實錄", ~
  5. "太宗實錄", ~
  6. "世宗實錄", ~
  7. "燕山君日記", ~
  8. "三國史記", ~
  9. "日本書紀", ~
  10. "經國大典", ~
  11. "唐六典", ~
  12. "東文選", ~
  13. "五洲衍文長箋散稿", ~
  14. "慵齋叢話", ~
  15. 不空, "七俱胝佛母所說准提陀羅尼經", ~
  16. 佛陀耶舍, "四分律", ~
  17. 阿地瞿多, "佛說陀羅尼集經", ~
  18. 阿質達霰, "穢跡金剛說神通大滿陀羅尼法術靈要門", ~
  19. 구중회, "(한국의 巫經)경책 문화와 역사" (2009), 민속원
  20. 기무라 키요타카, "중국불교사상사" (1989), 민족사
  21. 김수연, "고려 사회와 밀교" (2022), 씨아이알
  22. 金勝東, "道敎思想辭典" (1996), 釜山大學校出版部
  23. 김철웅, "고려시대의 道敎" (2017), 景仁文化社
  24. 李能和, "朝鮮道敎史" (1996), 普成文化社
  25. 서금석, "시간의 역사, 고려시대 달력을 복원하다" (2019), 혜안
  26. 孫弘烈, "韓國醫學史硏究-制度史를 中心으로" (2013), 修書院
  27. 정성준, "밀교학의 기초지식" (2007), Eastward
  28. 神塚淑子, "道敎經典の形成と佛敎" (2017), 名古屋大學出版會
  29. 吉基泰, "백제의 呪禁師와 藥師信仰", 新羅史學報, 6 (2006)
  30. 김상범, "醫術과 呪術: 唐代 醫療知識의 확산과 禁巫措置", 중국고중세사연구, (31), pp.367~404 (2014), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  31. 김성수, "조선 시대 한증 요법의 운영과 변천", 한국과학사학회지, 38(3), pp.509~537 (2016), 한국과학사학회
  32. 김성순, "도류승(道流僧)의 정체성과 독경활동 -무경(巫經)으로 전용되는경전들", 한국전통문화연구, 16 (2015)
  33. 김성순, "세종대의 불교정책과 한증승(汗蒸僧)", 종교연구, 74(2), pp.95~114 (2014), 한국종교학회[DOI]
  34. 김수연, "고려시대 밀교 치유 문화의 양상과 특징", 의사학, 30(1), pp.1~34 (2021), 대한의사학회
  35. 김지현, "도교와 술수: 분류체계의 변천과 4~6세기 도경을 중심으로", 철학사상, (53), pp.55~99 (2014), 철학사상연구소[DOI]
  36. 김철웅, "고려 태조대의 道敎와 醮禮", 도교문화연구, (44), pp.117~142 (2016), 한국도교문화학회
  37. 박경안, "고려인들의 다양한 금기와 질병을 대하는 태도", 역사와 현실, (59), pp.229~256 (2006), 한국역사연구회
  38. 박선경, "조선 초 승려 참여기구의 운영 변화", 국학연구, (47), pp.45~77 (2022), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
  39. 孫晋泰, "朝鮮民族文化의 硏究: 朝鮮 及 中國의 民俗 硏究 論集" (1948), 乙酉文化社
  40. 의 民間信仰 硏究, "온지논총", 2006, 215~244, pp.온지학회
  41. 이희재, "도교의 신비주의와 불교", 한국불교학, (74), pp.173~196 (2015), 한국불교학회
  42. 정다함, "조선전기의 정치적‧종교적 질병관, 醫‧藥의 개념‧범주, 그리고 치유방식", 한국사연구, (146), pp.119~157 (2009), 한국사연구회
  43. 趙允來, "道敎의 治病觀", 道敎學硏究, 17 (2001)
  44. 황인규, "한국 전근대 도교의 수용과 도불통섭 -거사와 승려 관련 기록 검토를 중심으로-", 한국사상사학, (50), pp.1~32 (2015), 한국사상사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)