조선 초 道流僧의 역할과 그 사상사적 의미
The Role of Doryu-seung(道流僧) in the Early Joseon Period and its Meaning in the History of Ideas
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I looked at one aspect of the consilience of Taoism and Buddhism in the healing culture of the Goryeo Dynasty by clarifying the categories of Doryu-seung(道流僧) that appeared in historical materials in the early Joseon Dynasty and examining their origins. Doryu-seung is a word that combines Doryu(道流), which means a Taoist, and Seung, a Buddhist monk. It was an expression that refers to a Buddhist monk who uses a Taoist method. They were mainly mobilized for royal therapy work. The representative Taoist method used by Doryu-seung is Dungap(遁甲, dun jia), which was used to move patients to the beneficial location for healing or hiding patients from diseases. Dungap is a technique based on the five elements of yin(陰) and yang(陽), and during the Joseon Dynasty, it was understood as a technique in the realm of Taoism. For this reason, monks who use Dungap were referred to as Doryu-seung. Doryu-seung shows similarities in activities and roles with a Chongji-jong(摠持宗) monk of Milwon(密員). The origin of Doryu-seung in the early Joseon Dynasty was found in the Jugeum(呪禁, zhou jin) culture of Goryeo and the activities of Chongji-jong, which continued until the early Joseon Dynasty. The monks of the Chongji-jong carried out treatment activities for the public with Jugeum, daily exorcism and Dungap, and I think this is why they used to be called as Doryu-seung. Meanwhile, Doryu-seung was also understood to be the same category as Maeng-seung(盲僧, blind monk) or the blind fortune teller. I think there is some confusion. Maeng-seung combined Taoist and Buddhist rituals since the Goryeo Dynasty, and blind fortune tellers who was called a “Seonsa(禪師)” in the Joseon Dynasty read both Taoist and Buddhist scriptures. It seems to have been misunderstood Doryu-seung as Maeng-seung or the blind fortune teller because of the combination of Taoism and Buddhism.
Abstract
In this paper, I looked at one aspect of the consilience of Taoism and Buddhism in the healing culture of the Goryeo Dynasty by clarifying the categories of Doryu-seung(道流僧) that appeared in historical materials in the early Joseon Dynasty and examining their origins. Doryu-seung is a word that combines Doryu(道流), which means a Taoist, and Seung, a Buddhist monk. It was an expression that refers to a Buddhist monk who uses a Taoist method. They were mainly mobilized for royal therapy work. The representative Taoist method used by Doryu-seung is Dungap(遁甲, dun jia), which was used to move patients to the beneficial location for healing or hiding patients from diseases. Dungap is a technique based on the five elements of yin(陰) and yang(陽), and during the Joseon Dynasty, it was understood as a technique in the realm of Taoism. For this reason, monks who use Dungap were referred to as Doryu-seung. Doryu-seung shows similarities in activities and roles with a Chongji-jong(摠持宗) monk of Milwon(密員). The origin of Doryu-seung in the early Joseon Dynasty was found in the Jugeum(呪禁, zhou jin) culture of Goryeo and the activities of Chongji-jong, which continued until the early Joseon Dynasty. The monks of the Chongji-jong carried out treatment activities for the public with Jugeum, daily exorcism and Dungap, and I think this is why they used to be called as Doryu-seung. Meanwhile, Doryu-seung was also understood to be the same category as Maeng-seung(盲僧, blind monk) or the blind fortune teller. I think there is some confusion. Maeng-seung combined Taoist and Buddhist rituals since the Goryeo Dynasty, and blind fortune tellers who was called a “Seonsa(禪師)” in the Joseon Dynasty read both Taoist and Buddhist scriptures. It seems to have been misunderstood Doryu-seung as Maeng-seung or the blind fortune teller because of the combination of Taoism and Buddhism.
참고문헌 (44)
- "高麗史", ~
- "高麗史節要", ~
- "太祖實錄", ~
- "定宗實錄", ~
- "太宗實錄", ~
- "世宗實錄", ~
- "燕山君日記", ~
- "三國史記", ~
- "日本書紀", ~
- "經國大典", ~
- "唐六典", ~
- "東文選", ~
- "五洲衍文長箋散稿", ~
- "慵齋叢話", ~
- 不空, "七俱胝佛母所說准提陀羅尼經", ~
- 佛陀耶舍, "四分律", ~
- 阿地瞿多, "佛說陀羅尼集經", ~
- 阿質達霰, "穢跡金剛說神通大滿陀羅尼法術靈要門", ~
- 구중회, "(한국의 巫經)경책 문화와 역사" (2009), 민속원
- 기무라 키요타카, "중국불교사상사" (1989), 민족사
- 김수연, "고려 사회와 밀교" (2022), 씨아이알
- 金勝東, "道敎思想辭典" (1996), 釜山大學校出版部
- 김철웅, "고려시대의 道敎" (2017), 景仁文化社
- 李能和, "朝鮮道敎史" (1996), 普成文化社
- 서금석, "시간의 역사, 고려시대 달력을 복원하다" (2019), 혜안
- 孫弘烈, "韓國醫學史硏究-制度史를 中心으로" (2013), 修書院
- 정성준, "밀교학의 기초지식" (2007), Eastward
- 神塚淑子, "道敎經典の形成と佛敎" (2017), 名古屋大學出版會
- 吉基泰, "백제의 呪禁師와 藥師信仰", 新羅史學報, 6 (2006)
- 김상범, "醫術과 呪術: 唐代 醫療知識의 확산과 禁巫措置", 중국고중세사연구, (31), pp.367~404 (2014), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
- 김성수, "조선 시대 한증 요법의 운영과 변천", 한국과학사학회지, 38(3), pp.509~537 (2016), 한국과학사학회
- 김성순, "도류승(道流僧)의 정체성과 독경활동 -무경(巫經)으로 전용되는경전들", 한국전통문화연구, 16 (2015)
- 김성순, "세종대의 불교정책과 한증승(汗蒸僧)", 종교연구, 74(2), pp.95~114 (2014), 한국종교학회[DOI]
- 김수연, "고려시대 밀교 치유 문화의 양상과 특징", 의사학, 30(1), pp.1~34 (2021), 대한의사학회
- 김지현, "도교와 술수: 분류체계의 변천과 4~6세기 도경을 중심으로", 철학사상, (53), pp.55~99 (2014), 철학사상연구소[DOI]
- 김철웅, "고려 태조대의 道敎와 醮禮", 도교문화연구, (44), pp.117~142 (2016), 한국도교문화학회
- 박경안, "고려인들의 다양한 금기와 질병을 대하는 태도", 역사와 현실, (59), pp.229~256 (2006), 한국역사연구회
- 박선경, "조선 초 승려 참여기구의 운영 변화", 국학연구, (47), pp.45~77 (2022), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
- 孫晋泰, "朝鮮民族文化의 硏究: 朝鮮 及 中國의 民俗 硏究 論集" (1948), 乙酉文化社
- 의 民間信仰 硏究, "온지논총", 2006, 215~244, pp.온지학회
- 이희재, "도교의 신비주의와 불교", 한국불교학, (74), pp.173~196 (2015), 한국불교학회
- 정다함, "조선전기의 정치적‧종교적 질병관, 醫‧藥의 개념‧범주, 그리고 치유방식", 한국사연구, (146), pp.119~157 (2009), 한국사연구회
- 趙允來, "道敎의 治病觀", 道敎學硏究, 17 (2001)
- 황인규, "한국 전근대 도교의 수용과 도불통섭 -거사와 승려 관련 기록 검토를 중심으로-", 한국사상사학, (50), pp.1~32 (2015), 한국사상사학회
