上古漢語聲調系統: 「古有四聲說」商榷
A Study on the Theory that Four Tone Categories Existed in the Ancient Chinese Period
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main goal of this paper is to re-examine existing opinions regarding the Tone issue of the Ancient Chinese Period. The Tone issue of the Ancient Chinese Period can be largely divided into opinions regarding the classification of Tone Category and presumption of Tone Pitch. In this paper, the main object for analysis is the classification of Tone Category. Various opinions of scholars from the Song Dynasty, Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty as well as the modern age have been compared and analyzed for this paper. Some scholars claim that no Tones at all existed in the Ancient Chinese Period, while other scholars claim that three, four or five Tone Categories existed during the Ancient Chinese Period. Modern scholars’ opinions also vary, suggesting either three, four or five Tone Categories. This shows that there has been no authorized opinion established regarding the Tone issue of the Ancient Chinese Period. This paper draws a conclusion that the opinion claimed by Wu Yu, Cheng Jiong, Chen Di, Gu Yanwu, Jiang Yong, Dai Zhen, Qian Daxin, Duan Yucai, Kong Guangsen, Zhang Huiyan, Zhang Chengsun, Zhang Binglin, Wang Guowei, Huang Kan, Wang Niansun, Liu Fenglu, Xia Xin, Xia Xie, Huang Yizhou and Jiang Yougao from the period of the Song Dynasty, Ming Dynasty and QingDynasty is reasonable, that Four Tones existed in the Ancient Chinese Period. This conclusion is also reflected in the analysis results by Zhou Zumo, Li Fanggui, Xie Yunfei, Ding Bangxin, Liu Changpei, Zhang Risheng, Xie Jifeng and Zheng Zhenqiang from the modern age, that Four Tones existed in the Ancient Chinese Period. Through the research result of this paper, I hope that a conclusion can be drawn regarding the Tone issue of the Ancient Chinese Period, which has been controversial in the academic world.
Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to re-examine existing opinions regarding the Tone issue of the Ancient Chinese Period. The Tone issue of the Ancient Chinese Period can be largely divided into opinions regarding the classification of Tone Category and presumption of Tone Pitch. In this paper, the main object for analysis is the classification of Tone Category. Various opinions of scholars from the Song Dynasty, Ming Dynasty and Qing Dynasty as well as the modern age have been compared and analyzed for this paper. Some scholars claim that no Tones at all existed in the Ancient Chinese Period, while other scholars claim that three, four or five Tone Categories existed during the Ancient Chinese Period. Modern scholars’ opinions also vary, suggesting either three, four or five Tone Categories. This shows that there has been no authorized opinion established regarding the Tone issue of the Ancient Chinese Period. This paper draws a conclusion that the opinion claimed by Wu Yu, Cheng Jiong, Chen Di, Gu Yanwu, Jiang Yong, Dai Zhen, Qian Daxin, Duan Yucai, Kong Guangsen, Zhang Huiyan, Zhang Chengsun, Zhang Binglin, Wang Guowei, Huang Kan, Wang Niansun, Liu Fenglu, Xia Xin, Xia Xie, Huang Yizhou and Jiang Yougao from the period of the Song Dynasty, Ming Dynasty and QingDynasty is reasonable, that Four Tones existed in the Ancient Chinese Period. This conclusion is also reflected in the analysis results by Zhou Zumo, Li Fanggui, Xie Yunfei, Ding Bangxin, Liu Changpei, Zhang Risheng, Xie Jifeng and Zheng Zhenqiang from the modern age, that Four Tones existed in the Ancient Chinese Period. Through the research result of this paper, I hope that a conclusion can be drawn regarding the Tone issue of the Ancient Chinese Period, which has been controversial in the academic world.
참고문헌 (30)
- "據成都渭南嚴式誨輯音韻學叢書本影印" (1966), 廣文書局
- 明·陳第, "毛詩古音考" (1966), 廣文書局
- 明·陳第, "讀詩拙言" (1966), 廣文書局
- 淸·顧炎武, "音學五書" (1966), 廣文書局
- 淸·江永, "古韻標準" (1966), 廣文書局
- 淸·戴震, "聲韻考" (1966), 音韻學叢書 第十一冊
- 淸·段玉裁, "六書音均表" (1966), 廣文書局
- 淸·孔廣森, "詩聲類" (1966), 廣文書局
- 淸·江有誥, "音學十書" (1966), 廣文書局
- 丁邦新, "漢語聲調源於韻尾說的檢討", 中央硏究院國際漢學會議論文集 語言文字組 (1981), 中央硏究院
- 丁邦新, "漢語聲調的演變", 中央硏究院第二屆國際漢學會議論文集 語言 與文字組 上冊 (1989), 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所
- 黃侃, "黃侃論學雜著" (1984), 漢京文化事業有限公司
- 黃以周, "六書通故", 華世出版社
- 李方桂, "上古音硏究" (1980), 商務印書館
- 李方桂, "中國語文 1984年(2)" (1984), 中國社會科學出版社
- 陸宗達, "王石臞先生韻譜·合韻譜遺稿跋", 北京大學 國學季刊, 3 (1932)
- 羅常培, "漢魏晉南北朝韻部演變硏究" (1958), 科學出版社
- 錢大昕, "潛硏堂文集·音韻問答" (1979), 臺灣商務印書館
- 王國維, "觀堂集林" (1959), 中華書局
- 王念孫, "高郵王氏遺書" (1925)
- 夏燮, "述均" (1930), 北平富晉書社
- 夏炘, "詩古韻表卄二部集說", 藝文印書館
- 謝紀鋒, "音韻學槪要" (1992), 廣西師範大學出版社
- 謝雲飛, "中國聲韻學大綱" (1987), 臺灣學生書局
- 謝雲飛, "許詩英先生六秩誕辰論文集" (1970), 驚聲文物供應公司
- 章炳麟, "國故論衡(章氏叢書 上冊)" (1982), 世界書局
- 張成孫, "說文諧聲譜(皇淸經解續編 第十冊)" (1965), 藝文印書館
- 張日昇, "試論上古四聲", 香港中文大學中國文化硏究所學報, 1 (1968)
- 鄭鎭椌, "上古漢語聲調的硏究", 博士, pp.1995
- 周祖謨, "問學集" (1979), 河洛圖書出版社
