王力先秦两汉时期的音韵学研究
A Study on Wang Li’s Archaic Chinese Phonology
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
During Research on Ancient Chinese phonology is an important tool to help people accurately interpret ancient literature. At present, the greatest impact in the domestic linguistics and most widely used ancient voice system is the doctrine of Mr. Wang. Many scholars believe that it is an important theoretical basis for research of ancient Chinese phonology. At the same time, the academic discussion and debate about Mr. Wang phonology system has not stopped. We can see that most scholars put forward different views on this is to make the phonology system improving. The paper tries to undertake systematic analysis about Mr. Wang’s system by three aspects, including initials (声母), finals (韵母), and tones (声调). To show Mr. Wang’s academic characteristic and the road of studying archaic Chinese phonology, we reviewed the results of the Qing Dynasty and contemporary phonology studies. In the research section on initials, this paper reviews the history of Mr. Wang Li’s study and attempts to find the origin theory of Mr. Wang’s initials system. In the research section on finals, I try to compare the similarities and dissimilarities between Mr. Wang’s system and the other three present linguists’ doctrines. These linguists include Zhiwei Lu, Tonghe Dong and Fanggui Li. I’m also referring to Karlgren’s ancient sound structure system. All of them recognized that harmonic sound times was earlier than “The Book of Songs” times, but they had different opinions on whether “The Book of Songs” times had consonant clusters. Many details about the rebuilding of archaic Chinese phonology are not yet conclusive. They thought it would wait for Sino-Tibetan languages studying to complete the work. So Wang Li of ancient phonology study does not include the harmonic sound system, he only uses the word “Book of Songs” appeared. They disputed whether yin-rhyme (阴声韵) had tail plosives (塞尾). The paper wants to clarify its view that Mr. Wang’s opinion is a sensible suggestion. In the research section on tones, I will look back the traditional tones studying and cite other tones studying. When the paper discusses the problem on tones, it combines tones with yun-wei (韵尾) to support the idea of Mr. Wang. The controversial issue is how to explain unusual rhyme. To sum up, if we want to better understand Mr. Wang’s ancient phonology theory, we should find out all of concepts intension and extension in his doctrine. In other words,in order to get a correct understanding of the specific issues we have to go look on the whole. Therefore, any person who does not fully understand the Wang Li’s phonology system, the accusations against individual concepts and conclusions are not correct.
Abstract
During Research on Ancient Chinese phonology is an important tool to help people accurately interpret ancient literature. At present, the greatest impact in the domestic linguistics and most widely used ancient voice system is the doctrine of Mr. Wang. Many scholars believe that it is an important theoretical basis for research of ancient Chinese phonology. At the same time, the academic discussion and debate about Mr. Wang phonology system has not stopped. We can see that most scholars put forward different views on this is to make the phonology system improving. The paper tries to undertake systematic analysis about Mr. Wang’s system by three aspects, including initials (声母), finals (韵母), and tones (声调). To show Mr. Wang’s academic characteristic and the road of studying archaic Chinese phonology, we reviewed the results of the Qing Dynasty and contemporary phonology studies. In the research section on initials, this paper reviews the history of Mr. Wang Li’s study and attempts to find the origin theory of Mr. Wang’s initials system. In the research section on finals, I try to compare the similarities and dissimilarities between Mr. Wang’s system and the other three present linguists’ doctrines. These linguists include Zhiwei Lu, Tonghe Dong and Fanggui Li. I’m also referring to Karlgren’s ancient sound structure system. All of them recognized that harmonic sound times was earlier than “The Book of Songs” times, but they had different opinions on whether “The Book of Songs” times had consonant clusters. Many details about the rebuilding of archaic Chinese phonology are not yet conclusive. They thought it would wait for Sino-Tibetan languages studying to complete the work. So Wang Li of ancient phonology study does not include the harmonic sound system, he only uses the word “Book of Songs” appeared. They disputed whether yin-rhyme (阴声韵) had tail plosives (塞尾). The paper wants to clarify its view that Mr. Wang’s opinion is a sensible suggestion. In the research section on tones, I will look back the traditional tones studying and cite other tones studying. When the paper discusses the problem on tones, it combines tones with yun-wei (韵尾) to support the idea of Mr. Wang. The controversial issue is how to explain unusual rhyme. To sum up, if we want to better understand Mr. Wang’s ancient phonology theory, we should find out all of concepts intension and extension in his doctrine. In other words,in order to get a correct understanding of the specific issues we have to go look on the whole. Therefore, any person who does not fully understand the Wang Li’s phonology system, the accusations against individual concepts and conclusions are not correct.
참고문헌 (50)
- 陈澧, "切韵考" (1987), 中国书店
- 陈新雄, "上古阴声韵尾再检讨", 语言研究, (2) (1998), 华中科技大学中国语言文字研究所
- 戴震, "戴震集" (1980), 上海古籍出版社
- 丁邦新, "丁邦新语言学论文集" (1998), 商务印书馆
- 丁邦新, "汉藏系语言研究法的检讨", 中国语文, (6) (2000), 中国社会科学院语言研究所
- 丁声树, "汉语音韵讲义", 方言, (4) (1981), 中国社会科学院语言研究所
- 董同龢, "《上古音韵表稿》历史语言研究所集刊第十八册" (1987), 中华书局
- 董同龢, "汉语音韵学" (2011), 中华书局
- 段玉裁, "说文解字注ㆍ六书音均表" (1998), 浙江古籍出版社
- 冯蒸, "论汉语上古声母研究中的考古派与审音派", 汉字文化, (2) (1998), 北京国际汉字研究会
- 高本汉, "中上古汉语音韵纲要" (1987), 齐鲁书社
- 高本汉, "中国音韵学研究" (1994), 商务印书馆
- 耿振生, "王力古音学浅探—纪念王力先生逝世十周年", 语文研究, (2) (1996), 山西省社会科学院
- 顾炎武, "音学五书" (1982), 中华书局
- 何九盈, "古韵通晓" (1987), 中国社会科学出版社
- 黄侃, "黄侃论学杂著" (1964), 中华书局
- 黄树先, "上古汉语复辅音声母探源", 语言研究, (3) (2001), 华中科技大学
- 黄笑山, "〈切韵〉三等韵的分类问题", 郑州大学学报ㆍ哲社版, (4) (1996), 郑州大学
- 黄焯, "古今声类通转表", pp.6~ (1983), 上海古籍出版社
- 江荻, "汉藏语言系属研究的文化人类学方法综述", 民族语文, (4) (1999), 中国社会科学院民族学与人类学研究所
- 江永, "古韵标准" (1982), 中华书局
- 江有诰, "江氏音学十书" (1993), 中华书局
- 孔广森, "诗声类" (1983), 中华书局
- 李葆嘉, "当代中国音韵学" (1998), 广东教育出版社
- 李方桂, "上古音研究" (1980), 商务印书馆
- 李荣, "切韵音系" (1956), 科学出版社
- 李新魁, "汉语音韵学" (1986), 北京出版社
- 罗常培, "汉语音韵学导论" (1956), 中华书局
- 陆志韦, "陆志韦语言学著作集(一)" (1985), 中华书局
- 陆志韦, "陆志韦语言学著作集(二)" (1999), 中华书局
- 梅祖麟, "梅祖麟语言学论文集" (2000), 商务印书馆
- 潘悟云, "汉语历史音韵学" (2000), 上海教育出版社
- 钱大昕, "十驾斋养新录" (1983), 上海书店
- 瞿霭堂, "汉藏语言声调起源研究中的几个理论问题", 民族语文, (2) (1999), 中国社会科学院民族学与人类学研究所
- 施向东, "汉语和藏语同源体系的比较研究" (2000), 华语教学出版社
- 史存直, "汉语音韵学论文集" (1997), 华东师范大学出版社
- 王力, "王力文选" (2000), 广西师范大学出版社
- 王力, "王力文集 第4—6卷" (1986), 山东教育出版社
- 王力, "王力文集 第8卷" (1992), 山东教育出版社
- 王力, "王力文集 第10卷" (1987), 山东教育出版社
- 王力, "王力文集 第12卷" (1990), 山东教育出版社
- 王力, "王力文集 第17卷" (1989), 山东教育出版社
- 王力, "汉语语音史" (1985), 中国社会科学出版社
- 向熹, "简明汉语史" (1993), 高等教育出版社
- 禹岩, "继往开来 把汉藏语系比较研究引向深入——汉藏语系力量以内和方法专题研讨会述评", 民族语文, (1) (1996), 中国社会科学院民族学与人类学研究所
- 赵秉璇, "古汉语复声母论文集" (1998), 北京语言文化大学出版社
- 张世禄, "中国音韵学史" (1984), 上海书店
- 曾运乾, "音韵学讲义" (1996), 中华书局
- 郑张尚芳, "上古韵母系统和四等、介音、声调的发源问题", 温州师范学院学报ㆍ哲社版, (4) (1987), 温州师范学院
- 郑张尚芳, "上古音研究的新近状态", 温州师范学院学报ㆍ哲社版, (4) (2000), 温州师范学院
