‘–어야 하다’와 ‘–었–’의 결합 양상과 함축 의미
A Research on the Combinatory Aspects and Implicature of ‘–eoya hada’ and ‘–eoss–’
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to investigate implicature meanings in the combination ‘–eoya ha–’ and ‘–eoss–’. The past tense ending ‘–eoss–’ can combine behind the ‘–eoya ha–’ and precede the ‘–eoya ha–’. Korean native speakers can infer two implications from the combination of ‘–eoya ha–’ with ‘–eoss–’. The purpose of this paper is to examine the first meaning and second meaning of these constructions; the first implication is that a proposition is realized in the past and the second one is that a proposition is not realized in the past. These implications are related with the scope of ‘–eoss–’ and modal meanings of ‘–eoya ha–’. They can be explained with the theory of Levinson’s GCI(Generalized Conversational Implicature). In this paper, ‘–eoya ha–＋–eoss–’ can be described with I-inferences and ‘–eoss–＋–eoya ha–’ can be explained with M-inferences. These implicature can be canceled depending on the context.
Abstract
This article aims to investigate implicature meanings in the combination ‘–eoya ha–’ and ‘–eoss–’. The past tense ending ‘–eoss–’ can combine behind the ‘–eoya ha–’ and precede the ‘–eoya ha–’. Korean native speakers can infer two implications from the combination of ‘–eoya ha–’ with ‘–eoss–’. The purpose of this paper is to examine the first meaning and second meaning of these constructions; the first implication is that a proposition is realized in the past and the second one is that a proposition is not realized in the past. These implications are related with the scope of ‘–eoss–’ and modal meanings of ‘–eoya ha–’. They can be explained with the theory of Levinson’s GCI(Generalized Conversational Implicature). In this paper, ‘–eoya ha–＋–eoss–’ can be described with I-inferences and ‘–eoss–＋–eoya ha–’ can be explained with M-inferences. These implicature can be canceled depending on the context.
참고문헌 (24)
- 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미 연구" (2006), 태학사
- 손혜옥, "한국어 양태 범주 연구", 박사, pp.2016
- 안주호, "‘-어야 하-’류 구성의 문법적 특성과 의미", 국어교육, (118), pp.363~394 (2005), 한국어교육학회
- 이동혁, "‘-어야 하다’의 양태 의미에 대하여", 國語學, (76), pp.95~122 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이성범, "영어화용론", pp.135~202 (2012), 종합출판 ENG
- 이성범, "소통의 화용론: 커뮤니케이션에 대한 화용적 접근" (2015), 한국문화사
- 이정훈, "보조용언 구문의 구조와 대용 현상", 한국어학, 49, pp.319~344 (2010), 한국어학회
- Huang, Y., "화용론" (2009), 한국외국어대학교출판부
- 전성호, "Levinon의 GCI 이론을 통한 ‘거시기’의 화용론적 분석", 한국어 의미학, 23, pp.159~179 (2007), 한국어의미학회
- 최동주, "종결어미 ‘-ㄹ걸’의 기능과 문법적 특성", 國語學, (54), pp.225~251 (2009), 국어학회
- 한동완, "국어의 시제 연구" (1996), 태학사
- 한동완, "인식 시제인가, 인식 양태인가", 형태론, 6(1), pp.137~150 (2004), 형태론
- Barbiers, S., "The Blackwell Companion to Syntax V" (2006), Blacwell Publishing
- Grice, H. P., "Syntax and Semantics Vol.3: Speech Acts", pp.43~58 (1967), Academic Press
- Hacquard, V., "Aspects of Modality", Ph.D., pp.2006
- Horn, L. R., "Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects", pp.36~69 (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
- Huang, Y., "Pragmatics" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Levinson, S. C., "The Pragmatic Perspective", pp.61~129 (1987), John Benjamins Pub
- Levinson, S. C., "Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature" (2000), MIP Press
- Mun, B. K., "The Interaction of Modality and Tense in Korean", Ph.D., pp.2016
- Narrog, H., "Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Palmer, F. R., "Modality and the English Modals" (1990), Roudtledge Taylor & Francis Group
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Portner, P., "Modality" (2009), Oxford Univerity Press