‘었’의 현재완료 상 의미와 단순과거 시제 의미의 관계: 염재일(2010a)에 대하여
The Meaning Relations between Present Perfect Aspect and Simple Past Tense of Ess in Korean: A Reply to Yeom (2010a)
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean morpheme ess has been analysed as a past tense marker, a perfect aspect marker, both, or neither. Although all of them agree that it is used to convey both the past event and its present result state aspect, they have different accounts of which is the meaning of the morpheme and which is the implication of it. In this paper, we attempt to explore the meaning relations between the past event and the present result state conveyed by ess, replying to Yeom (2010a), along with his other works (2010b, 2012). He argues that ess is ambiguous between past tense and present perfect and thus one cannot be derived from the other. He continues that the present result state presupposes the past event and the past event entails the present result state. We examine his claims closely and conclude that they are not correct. Rather the present result state entails the past event and the past event R-implicates the present result state. In this paper, we only clarify their meaning relations, without explicitly supporting any of the existing theories of the meaning of ess, but these clarifications may shed light on the meaning of the morpheme ess.
Abstract
Korean morpheme ess has been analysed as a past tense marker, a perfect aspect marker, both, or neither. Although all of them agree that it is used to convey both the past event and its present result state aspect, they have different accounts of which is the meaning of the morpheme and which is the implication of it. In this paper, we attempt to explore the meaning relations between the past event and the present result state conveyed by ess, replying to Yeom (2010a), along with his other works (2010b, 2012). He argues that ess is ambiguous between past tense and present perfect and thus one cannot be derived from the other. He continues that the present result state presupposes the past event and the past event entails the present result state. We examine his claims closely and conclude that they are not correct. Rather the present result state entails the past event and the past event R-implicates the present result state. In this paper, we only clarify their meaning relations, without explicitly supporting any of the existing theories of the meaning of ess, but these clarifications may shed light on the meaning of the morpheme ess.
참고문헌 (19)
- 양정석, "한국어 시간요소들의 형태통사론", 언어, 33(4), pp.693~722 (2008), 한국언어학회
- 염재일, "‘-었-’의 중의성", 언어학, (58), pp.237~264 (2010), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 이성범, "추론의 화용론" (2001), 한국문화사
- Brown, Penelope, "Politeness: Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Grice, H. Paul., "Logic and conversation. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts", pp.41~58 (1975), Academic Press
- Horn, Laurence R, "Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature, In Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin", pp.11~42 (1984), Georgetown University Press
- Lee, Chungmin, "Temporal expressions in Korean, In The pragmatic perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference", pp.435~447 (1987), Benjamin
- Lee, Hyo Sang, "Tense, aspect and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal suffixes in Korean from a typological perspective", 박사, pp.1991
- Lee, Eun-Hee, "Dynamic and stative information in temporal reasoning: Interpretation of Korean past tense markers in narrative discourse", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 16, pp.1~25 (2007)
- Morgan, Jerry, "Two types of convention in indirect speech acts, In Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics", pp.261~280 (1978), Academic Press
- Oh, Sun-Young, "The Korean verbal suffix -ess-: A diachronic account of its multiple uses", Journal of Pragmatics, 35, pp.1181~1222 (2003)
- Portner, Paul H., "The (temporal) and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect", Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, pp.459~510 (2003)
- Portner, Paul H, "What is meaning?" (2005), Blackwell
- Russell, Bertrand, "On denoting", Mind, 14, pp.479~493 (1905)
- Saeed, John I., "Semantics" (2009), Wiley-Blackwell
- Searle, John., "Indirect speech acts, In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts", pp.59~82 (1975), Academic Press
- Yang, Jeong Seok., "The Morphosyntax of Korean temporal elements and interpretation of –ess-", Paper presented at the Workshop on Tense and Aspect in Korean and Japanese (2012), Seoul National University
- 염재일, "Semantics and Pragmatics of -ess in Korean", 어학연구, 46(2), pp.199~236 (2010), 언어교육원
- Yeom, Jae-il., "Two meanings of ess: the past and the perfect", Paper presented at the Workshop on Tense and Aspect in Korean and Japanese (2012), Seoul National University