본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

통화정책의 Cash-Flow 경로 유효성 분석

An Analysis of Cash-Flow Channel Effectiveness in Monetary Policy

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

본 연구는 국내 통화정책의 현금흐름 경로 유효성을 분석하고 동 경로에 따른 소비지출 변동 효과를 시산하였다. 분석결과, 차입 및 저축가구 현금흐름 경로가 모두 유의하게 작동하는 것으로 나타났으며 차입가구 중 유동성제약(Hand-to- Mouth) 가구인 경우에는 그 효과가 더욱 큰 것으로 추정되었다. 금리 100bp 인하 시 소비변동 효과는 차입가구는 2.4%, 저축가구는 Δ0.9%로 추정되었다. 이처럼 차입가구의 현금흐름 경로에 의한 소비지출 변동(2.4%)이 저축가구(Δ 0.9%)에 비해 높게 추정되었음에도 불구하고 저축가구의 비중(약 70%)이 상대적으로 많아 차입가구 효과가 상쇄되면서 경제전체의 소비지출 변동(0.06%)은 미미한 것으로 나타났다. 다만 이를 유동성제약(Hand-to-Mouth) 가구로 한정시킬경우에는 경제전체적으로 소비지출이 0.19% 상승하는 것으로 분석되었다.

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the cash-flow channel effectiveness in domestic monetary policy and quantify the change of consumption expenditure according to this channel. We find that both borrower and lender cash-flow channel are significant, and it is estimated that the effect of cash-flow channel on consumption expenditure is stronger for HtM borrower households than non-HtM. Although the change of consumption expenditure by borrower cash-flow channel(2.4%) was estimated to be higher than that of lender households(Δ0.9%), the change of consumption expenditure on the whole economy(0.06%) was not large when the interest rates reduced by 100bp. This is because the share of lender households(about 70%) is relatively higher than that of borrower households, which offset the effect of borrower cash-flow channel. However, if we limit this analysis to HtM households, the change of consumption expenditure on the whole economy is estimated to be 0.19%.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 김기화, "경기순환 국면별 통화정책 효과의 비대칭성", 경제학연구, 58(1), pp.57~85 (2010), 한국경제학회
  2. 김석원, "통화정책과 금융기관의 비대칭적 금리조정", 금융경제연구, (293) (2007), 한국은행 금융경제연구원
  3. Transmission of Monetary Policy in Times of High Household Debt, "김영주", 한국은행, ~, pp.BOK경제연구, 2017-35호 (2017)
  4. 김준태, "금리변동의 비대칭성과 통화정책의 효과", The Bank of Korea, 7(4), pp.1~34 (2001), 한국은행 특별연구실
  5. 김치호, "경제변동의 비대칭성과 통화정책", The Bank of Korea Research Department, 5(2), pp.1~28 (1999), 한국은행 조사국
  6. 양준모, "경기 국면별 금리변동의 파급영향 분석", 4(4), pp.48~73 (2003)
  7. Anderson, G., "The Potential Impact of Higher Interest Rates on the Household Sector: Evidence from the 2014 NMG Consulting Survey", Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 54(4), pp.419~433 (2014)
  8. Monetary Policy and the Redistribution Channel, "Auclert, A.", MIT, ~ (2016)
  9. Breusch, T. S., "A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation", Econometrica, 47(5) (1979)
  10. The Economic Stimulus Payments of 2008 and the Aggregate Demand for Consumption, "Broda, C.", ~ (2014)
  11. Calza, A., "Housing Finance and Monetary Policy", Journal of the European Economic Association, 11 (2013)
  12. The Household Cash Flow Channel of Monetary Policy, "Cava, L. G.", RBA, ~, pp.Research Discussion Paper, No. 2016-12 (2016)
  13. Monetary Policy when Households have Debt: New Evidence on the Transmission Mechanism, "Cloyne, J.", ~ (2016)
  14. Monetary Policy Pass Through:Household Consumption and Voluntary Deleveraging, "Di Maggio, M.", Columbia University, Berkeley University and Boards of Governors, ~ (2015)
  15. Flodén, M., "Household Debt and Monetary Policy: Revealing the Cash-flow Channel", ~ (2016)
  16. Friedman, M., "The Permanent Income Hypothesis", ~ (1957)
  17. Mortgages and Monetary Policy, Working Paper, "Garriga, Carlos", Federal Reserve Bank of St, ~ (2015)
  18. Hausman, J. A., "Specification Tests in Econometrics", Econometrica, 46(6) (1978)
  19. Monetary Policy, Heterogeneity and the Housing Channel, "Hedlund, Aaron", ~ (2016)
  20. The Consumption Response to Income Changes, "Jappelli, T.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.Working Paper 15739 (2010)
  21. Johnson, D., "Household Expenditure and the Income Tax Rebates of 2001", The American Economic Review, 96(5), pp.1589~1610 (2006)
  22. Kaplan, G., "The Wealthy Hand-to-mouth", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 48(Spring) (2014)
  23. MaCurdy, T., "The Use of Time Series Processes to Model the Error Structure of Earnings in a Longitudinal Data Analysis", Journal of Econometrics, 18(1), pp.83~114 (1982)
  24. Misra. K., "Consumption, Income Changes, and Heterogeneity: Evidence from Two Fiscal Stimulus Programs", American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6(4), pp.84~106 (2014)
  25. Ni, S., "New Evidence on Excess Sensitivity of Household Consumption", Journal of Monetary Economics, 63, pp.80~94 (2014)
  26. Parker, J. A., "The Reaction of Household Consumption to Predictable Changes in Social Security Taxes", The American Economic Review, 89(4), pp.959~973 (1999)
  27. Parker, J. A., "Consumer Spending and the Economic Stimulus Payments of 2008", American Economic Review, 103(6), pp.2530~2553 (2013)
  28. Robert, E. Hall, "Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis:Theory and Evidence", Journal of Political Economy, 86(6), pp.971~987 (1978)
  29. Rubio, Margarita, "Fixed- and Variable-Rate Mortgages, Business Cycles, and Monetary Policy", Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43(4) (2011)
  30. Shapiro, M., "Consumer Response to Tax Rebates", American Economic Review, 93(1), pp.381~396 (2003)
  31. Shapiro, M., "Did the 2001 Tax Rebate Stimulate Spending? Evidence from Taxpayer Surveys", Tax Policy and the Economy, 17, pp.83~109 (2003)
  32. Shapiro, M., "Did the 2008 Tax Rebates Stimulate Spending?", American Economic Review, 99(2), pp.374~379 (2009)
  33. Souleles, N., "The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax Refunds", American Economic Review, 89(4), pp.947~958 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)