본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가계부채 제약하의 통화정책: 2주체 거시모형(TANK)에서의 정량적 분석

Monetary Policy in a Two-Agent Economy with Debt-Constrained Households

정용승|송승주
한국은행|2019.06|경제분석 (Economic Analysis)|제25권 제2호|pp. 1-53|DOI 10.23299/bokeri.2019.25.2.001

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

통화정책Monetary Policy저축가계차입가계2주체 거시모형(TANK)BorrowerSaverTwo-Agent New Keynesian Economy
주제분류경제학

초록

본 연구는 가계 일부가 부채 누적으로 신용시장에서 일정 한도 이상으로는 차입이 어려워 기간간 소비의 평활화(smoothing)에 제약을 받는 상황이 통화정책에 미치는 영향을 금융시장의 불완전성(incomplete financial markets)이 내재된 2주체 소규모 새케인지언 구조모형(Two Agents New Keynesian Model)을 통해 분석하고 있다. 생산비용 상승이라는 경제상황 변화가 있을 때 신용시장에서 차입한도제약을 받는 차입가계와 제약을 받지 않는 저축가계가 소비 및 노동공급에 대해 보이는 비대칭적 반응은 결국 두 가계간 통화정책 전달경로의 확장으로 이어진다. 물가갭과 생산갭을 동시에 고려하여 정책금리를 결정하는 신축적 물가목표 정책의 사회후생 수준은 차입가계 비중은 물론 모든 경제상황을 종합적으로 고려하여 정책금리를 결정하는 Ramsey 유형의 최적정책과는 비슷하고 순순하게 물가목표 달성만을 추구하는 엄격한 물가목표 정책의 사회후생 수준보다는 높았다. 이는 가계 일부가 차입한도제약을 받는 상황에서도 신축적 물가목표 정책이 여전히 유효함을 시사한다. 또한 생산비용 상승에 대하여 신축적 물가목표 정책과 최적정책 하에서 소비와 노동공급은 엄격한 물가목표 정책보다는 완만히 조정되는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract

This paper examines monetary policy quantitatively in a two-agent and small-scale New-Keynesian economy with debt-constrained households that cannot smooth their consumption intertemporally and frictionlessly since highly indebted households are not allowed to borrow above a certain debt ceiling in incomplete financial markets without additional risk premiums due to information asymmetry between savers and borrowers. We find that, in the event of cost shocks, the asymmetric responses of borrowing households without, and saving households with, dividend incomes lead to different labor supplies and consumptions over heterogeneous households, and eventually to an extension of the monetary policy transmission channels. The income effect and low elasticity of the labor supply play key roles in such asymmetric responses over heterogeneous households. We also find that the social welfare in a flexible inflation targeting (FIT) monetary policy, in which both the inflation gap and the output gap are considered in an integrated manner when policy-making, is similar to that of the Ramsey optimal monetary policy (ROP), in which the shares of debt-constrained households, as well as all economic states, including both the inflation gap and output gap, are considered comprehensively for policy-making, and that it is greater than that of simple inflation targeting (SIT) monetary policy, in which only the inflation gap is considered mechanically for policy-making. Such social welfare implies that a FIT policy may still work even in an economy with a sizable number of debt-constrained households. Further, the responses of cost shocks to consumption and labor supply are dying out more slowly under FIT and ROP policies than under an SIT policy.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 김인수, "실업률을 고려한 최적 통화정책 분석", 금융연구, 29(3), pp.33~73 (2015), 한국금융학회
  2. 문외솔, "노동공급 탄력성 추정", 노동경제논집, 39(2), pp.35~51 (2016), 한국노동경제학회
  3. Bilbiie, Florin Ovidiu, "Limited Asset Markets Participation, Monetary Policy and(Inverted) Aggregate Demand Logic", Journal of Economic Theory, 140(1), pp.162~196 (2008)
  4. Bilbiie, Florin Ovidiu, "The New Keynesian Cross", Journal of Monetary Economics (2019), Forthcoming
  5. Bilbiie, Florin Ovidiu, "Changes in the Output Euler Equation and Asset Markets Participation", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(11), pp.1659~1672 (2012)
  6. Bilbiie, Florin Ovidiu, "Public Debt and Redistribution with Borrowing Constraints", Economic Journal, 123(1), pp.F64~F98 (2013)
  7. Brzoza-Brzezina, Michał, "Monetary Policy in a Non-Representative Agent Economy: A Survey", Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(4), pp.641~669 (2013)
  8. Blanchard, Olivier, "Real Wage Rigidities and the New Keynesian Model", Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 30(1), pp.35~65 (2007)
  9. Calvo, Guillermo A., "Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework", Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(3), pp.383~398 (1983)
  10. Campbell, John Y., "Consumption, Income and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence", NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1989(4), pp.185~246 (1989)
  11. Daeha Cho, "Redistribution and Optimal Monetary Policy", 계량경제학보, 29(4), pp.61~80 (2018), 한국계량경제학회[DOI]
  12. Coibion, Olivier, "Monetary Policy, Trend Inflation, and the Great Moderation: An Alternative Interpretation", American Economic Review, 101(1), pp.341~370 (2011)
  13. Coibion, Olivier, "The Optimal Inflation Rate in New Keynesian Models: Should Central Banks Raise Their Inflation Targets in Light of the Zero Lower Bound?", Review of Economic Studies, 79(4), pp.1371~1406 (2012)
  14. Debortoli, Davide, "Monetary Policy with Heterogeneous Agents:Insights from TANK Models" (2018), Mimeo
  15. Dixit, Avinash K., "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity", American Economic Review, 67(3), pp.297~308 (1977)
  16. Eggertson, Gauti B., "The Zero Bound on Interest Rates and Optimal Monetary Policy", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2003(1), pp.139~211 (2003)
  17. Estrella, Arturo, "Monetary Policy Shifts and the Stability of Monetary Policy Models", Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), pp.94~104 (2003)
  18. Fuhrer, Jeffrey C., "Estimating the Euler Equation for Output", Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(6), pp.1133~1153 (2004)
  19. Galí, Jordi, "Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework and Its Applications" (2008), Princeton University Press
  20. Hall, Robert E., "Intertemporal Substitution in Consumption", Journal of Political Economy, 96(2), pp.339~357 (1988)
  21. Hicks, John Richard, "Value and Capital: An Inquiry into Some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory" (1946), Clarendon Press
  22. Jung, Yongseung, "Inspecting the Channel of Monetary Policy in an Open Economy through the Lens of a TANK Model" (2018), Mimeo
  23. Kaplan, Greg, "The Wealthy Hand-to-Mouth", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2014(1), pp.77~153 (2014)
  24. Kaplan, Greg, "Monetary Policy According to HANK Model", American Economic Review, 108(3), pp.697~743 (2017)
  25. Leeper, Eric M., "Dynamics of Fiscal Financing in the United States", Journal of Econometrics, 156(2), pp.304~332 (2014)
  26. Lucas, Robert E., Jr., "Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique", Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1, pp.19~46 (1976)
  27. Lucas, Robert E., Jr., "Models of Business Cycles" (1987), Basil Blackwell
  28. 박기영, "The Wealthy Hand-to-Mouth Households in South Korea", Global Economic Review, 46(3), pp.299~324 (2017), 동서문제연구원
  29. Schmitt-Grohe, Stephanie, "Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy under Sticky Prices", Journal of Economic Theory, 114(1), pp.198~230 (2004)
  30. Schmitt-Grohe, Stephanie, "Handbook on Monetary Economics 3B" (2011), Elsevier
  31. Sidrauski, Miguel, "Rational Choice and Patterns of Growth in a Monetary Economy", American Economic Review, 57(2), pp.534~544 (1967)
  32. Woodford, Michael, "Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy" (2003), Princeton University Press
  33. Yogo, Motohiro, "Estimating of the Elasticity of Intertemporal Substitution When Instruments Are Weak", Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(3), pp.797~810 (2004)
  34. Yun, "Optimal Monetary Policy with Relative Price Distortions", American Economic Review, 95(1), pp.89~108 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

통화신용정책과 거시건전성정책의 정책공조 효과 평가주동헌보험연구원 · 보험금융연구2014 · 제25권 제2호통화정책 운영체제별 정책효과 비교, 분석허준영보험연구원 · 보험금융연구2022 · 제33권 제2호거시경제와 금융안정을 종합 고려한 최적 통화정책체계 연구오형석, 허준영한국개발연구원 · KDI Journal of Economic Policy2024 · 제46권 제1호금융시장 참가제약과 최적 인플레이션율박양수, 정용승한국경제학회 · 경제학연구2016 · 제64권 제2호통화정책과 은행의 역할: 은행부문이 포함된 DSGE 모형에서 통화정책 대응 분석을 중심으로김현의, 엄상민한국은행 · 경제분석2011 · 제17권 제1호부채의 디레버리징과 경기변동강두용, 정용승한국국제경제학회 · 국제경제연구2018 · 제24권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)

온라인 거래의 증가가 지역 소매 상권에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구이강배pp. 54-95청년실업의 이력현상 분석김남주pp. 96-131미국 통화정책이 국내 금융시장 및 자금유출입에 미치는 영향: TVP-VAR 모형 분석서현덕, 강태수pp. 132-176
원문 보기