「舊滿洲檔」에서 「滿洲實錄」까지 - 청 태조실록의 편찬과 수정
From the Jiu Manzhou dang(舊滿洲檔) to the Manzhou shilu(滿洲實錄) : Compilations and revisions of the Veritable Record for the Qing Taizu
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to review the historical process how Manzhou shilu (滿洲實錄) and Qing taizu gaohuangdi shilu (太祖高皇帝實錄), the two most important publications on Qing Taizu Nurhaci, were compiled in the Qianlong period after a series of revisions throughout the early Qing period. Repeated revisions of the record about the first ruler of the Qing empire, after it first came out in the Shunzhi era, shows a typical case of re-writing history as political agendas changed at each period. The fact that the history of the early Qing rulers was rewritten and reprint throughout the seventeenth to the eighteenth century demonstrates that the Qing court's understanding of their Manchu ancestors was transformed along with the development of the Qing empire. This paper explains that early records about the first Qing ruler were first written in Old Manchu scripts, known as Jiu Manzhou dang, and later rewritten in New Manchu scripts, which was generally regarded as Manwen laodang (滿文老檔). These archival documents became the primary source in compiling two official histories for the Qing Taizu. One is Manzhou shilu, having Manchu, Mongol, Chinese texts and images, and the other Qing Taizu gaohuangdi shilu, with only Chinese text following traditional Chinese writing style. It is interesting to note that the Manchou shilu, despite of being compiled in 1779, maintains earlier records about Nurhaci than the Qing Taizu gaohuangdi shilu compiled in 1739. Numerous changes and deletions are found in comparing the Manzhou shilu with the Qing Taizu gaohuangdi shilu, and this discrepancy between two records on the same figure shows that understanding the history of the early Qing ruler and Manchu ancestors were constantly changed during the Qianlong period.
Abstract
This paper aims to review the historical process how Manzhou shilu (滿洲實錄) and Qing taizu gaohuangdi shilu (太祖高皇帝實錄), the two most important publications on Qing Taizu Nurhaci, were compiled in the Qianlong period after a series of revisions throughout the early Qing period. Repeated revisions of the record about the first ruler of the Qing empire, after it first came out in the Shunzhi era, shows a typical case of re-writing history as political agendas changed at each period. The fact that the history of the early Qing rulers was rewritten and reprint throughout the seventeenth to the eighteenth century demonstrates that the Qing court's understanding of their Manchu ancestors was transformed along with the development of the Qing empire. This paper explains that early records about the first Qing ruler were first written in Old Manchu scripts, known as Jiu Manzhou dang, and later rewritten in New Manchu scripts, which was generally regarded as Manwen laodang (滿文老檔). These archival documents became the primary source in compiling two official histories for the Qing Taizu. One is Manzhou shilu, having Manchu, Mongol, Chinese texts and images, and the other Qing Taizu gaohuangdi shilu, with only Chinese text following traditional Chinese writing style. It is interesting to note that the Manchou shilu, despite of being compiled in 1779, maintains earlier records about Nurhaci than the Qing Taizu gaohuangdi shilu compiled in 1739. Numerous changes and deletions are found in comparing the Manzhou shilu with the Qing Taizu gaohuangdi shilu, and this discrepancy between two records on the same figure shows that understanding the history of the early Qing ruler and Manchu ancestors were constantly changed during the Qianlong period.
참고문헌 (49)
- 신승하, "중국사학사", pp.128~129 (2000), 고려대학교출판부
- 陳捷先, "滿文淸實錄硏究, In 滿文檔案叢書第一集", pp.3~4 (1980), 大化書局
- "滿洲實錄 권3,110下-111上", ~
- "太祖高皇帝實錄 권3, 44上", ~
- "淸太宗實錄 권11,156下(天聰6", 3, ~
- 劉小萌, "滿族從部落到國家的發展", pp.250~ (2007), 中國社會科學院出版社
- "淸太宗實錄 권9,124上下(天聰5", 7, ~
- 滿文老檔硏究會, "滿文老檔 제6권", pp.956~957 (1962), 東洋文庫
- 喬治忠, "淸朝官方史學硏究, In 大陸地區博士論文叢刊", pp.85~87 (1994), 文津出版社
- "淸太宗實錄 권16, 214上(天聰7", 10, ~
- 閻崇年, "論 ｢滿文老檔｣", 滿學硏究, 4, pp.29~33 (1998)
- "淸高宗實錄 권976,39下(乾隆 40", 2, ~
- 김두현, "『滿文原檔』과 入關前 淸史硏究", 명청사연구, (30), pp.259~286 (2008), 명청사학회
- 中見立夫, "日本の東洋史學黎明期における史料への探究, In 神田信夫先生 古稀記念論集:淸朝と東アジア", pp.106~114 (1992), 山川出版社
- 神田信夫, "從 『滿文老檔 』 到 『舊滿洲檔 』", 滿學硏究, 3, pp.256~260 (1996)
- 李學智, "淸太祖朝老滿文原檔 1･2" (1971), 中央硏究院歷史言語硏究所
- 張葳, "舊滿洲檔譯註淸太宗朝 1･2" (1980), 國立故宮博物院
- 遼寧大學歷史係, "漢譯滿文舊檔" (1979), 遼寧大學
- 東洋文庫淸代史硏究室, "舊滿洲檔天聰九年 1･2" (1975), 東洋文庫
- 關嘉祿, "天聰九年檔" (1987), 天津古籍社
- 中國第一歷史檔案館, "內閣藏本 滿文老檔" (2009), 遼寧民族出版社
- "淸太宗實錄 권24,320上(天聰9", 8, ~
- 이시바시 다카오, "대청제국 1616-1799:100만의 만주족은 어떻게 1억의 한족을지배하였을까" (2009), 휴머니스트
- "淸太宗實錄 ..권32, 404下-405上(崇德元年", 11, ~
- 滿文老檔硏究會, "滿文老檔 제7권", pp.1441~1443 (1963), 東洋文庫
- "淸史稿 권218,列傳5, 諸王4,太祖諸子3,睿忠親王多爾袞,", pp.9030~ (1994), 中華書局
- "淸世祖實錄 권54, 432上(順治8", 潤2, ~
- "淸世祖實錄 권89, 702下-703上(順治12", 2, ~
- "康熙朝議修實錄･聖訓等事題稿檔", 文獻叢編, 5 (1937)
- "淸聖祖實錄 권103, 69下(康熙21", 10, ~
- "淸太祖實錄 首卷1, In 太祖實錄康熙序" (1986), 中華書局
- "淸太祖實錄 권1, 26上", ~
- "淸世宗實錄 권49,853上(雍正12", 11, ~
- "淸太祖實錄 卷10,143上-143下", ~
- "청고종실록 권1075,435下(건륭44", 1, ~
- "滿洲實錄 권8,423上", ~
- "淸高宗實錄 권1130,109下(乾隆46", 5, ~
- Kent Guy, "The Emperor’s Four Treasures: Scholars and the State in the Late Ch’ien-lung Era" (1987), Harvard University Press
- 켄트 가이, "四庫全書", pp.70~71 (2009), 생각의나무
- "滿洲實錄 권8, 423上", ~
- "滿洲實錄 권5, 256下(천명4", 5, ~
- "太祖武皇帝實 錄 권2 ,3쪽", ~
- "淸太祖實錄 권3,45下", ~
- "滿洲實錄 3:115하-116상", ~
- "淸太祖實錄 권10,142上(天命11", 8, ~
- "滿洲實錄 권5,262", ~
- "太祖高皇帝實錄 권6,86하(天命4", 6, ~
- "滿洲實錄 ..권 8,381상-382상", ~
- "淸太祖實錄 ..권9,127下", ~