≪滿文老檔≫과 ≪滿洲實錄≫의 만주문 대조 연구
A comparative study of Manchu sentences in Manwen Laodang and Manzhou Shilu
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to examine the differences of Manchu sentences shown in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 and Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄, which give us a view of the Manchu language in the Early Qing Dynasty, and thereby to investigate the cause of differences. The main differences are as follows: 1) In Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄, some sentences are omitted or abbreviated compared to those of Manwen Laodang, and the order of sentences is corrected in case where the sentences are out of order in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔. 2) There are instances in Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄 where words are added or substituted to communicate the meaning of sentence written in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 more clearly, or where incorrect usage of a particular word in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 is corrected. 3) Paragraphs that consist of enumerated sentences in Manwen Laodang are written in a single sentence in Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄. A group of closed short sentences in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 is often realized as a chain of phrases connected by converb endings in Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄. These seem to have resulted from the difference of narrative style in two literatures. 4) There are instances where case makers which do not appear in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 are used in Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄. In some cases, Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 and Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄 adopt different case markers to describe the same events. This difference comes from the dissimilar sentence structures of two literatures. 5) In connecting the sentences, Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 often uses gerunds, and then uses the verb stem and converb ending again, while Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄 connects verb stems and converb endings without using gerunds. 6) In some cases, Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 tends to repeat a description of an event that is mentioned right before the sentence. However, Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄 does not. 7) Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄 corrects the agreement errors shown in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔.
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the differences of Manchu sentences shown in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 and Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄, which give us a view of the Manchu language in the Early Qing Dynasty, and thereby to investigate the cause of differences. The main differences are as follows: 1) In Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄, some sentences are omitted or abbreviated compared to those of Manwen Laodang, and the order of sentences is corrected in case where the sentences are out of order in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔. 2) There are instances in Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄 where words are added or substituted to communicate the meaning of sentence written in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 more clearly, or where incorrect usage of a particular word in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 is corrected. 3) Paragraphs that consist of enumerated sentences in Manwen Laodang are written in a single sentence in Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄. A group of closed short sentences in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 is often realized as a chain of phrases connected by converb endings in Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄. These seem to have resulted from the difference of narrative style in two literatures. 4) There are instances where case makers which do not appear in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 are used in Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄. In some cases, Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 and Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄 adopt different case markers to describe the same events. This difference comes from the dissimilar sentence structures of two literatures. 5) In connecting the sentences, Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 often uses gerunds, and then uses the verb stem and converb ending again, while Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄 connects verb stems and converb endings without using gerunds. 6) In some cases, Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔 tends to repeat a description of an event that is mentioned right before the sentence. However, Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄 does not. 7) Manzhou Shilu 滿洲實錄 corrects the agreement errors shown in Manwen Laodang 滿文老檔.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김두현, "『滿文原檔』과 入關前 淸史硏究", 명청사연구, (30), pp.259~286 (2008), 명청사학회
- 김두현, "《滿文老檔》과 《舊檔》 對照表" (2010), 울산대학교 출판부
- 김선민, "「舊滿洲檔」에서 「滿洲實錄」까지 - 청 태조실록의 편찬과 수정", 史叢(사총), (77), pp.139~176 (2012), 역사연구소
- 김주원, "두 실록의 번역서-조선태조실록과 만주실록", 인문논총, 71(3), pp.361~378 (2014), 인문학연구원
- 만주실록 역주회, "만주실록 역주" (2014), 소명출판
- 성백인, "만문 무권점 십이자두 연구", 말, 3, pp.97~134 (1978), 연세대학교 한국어학당
- 성백인, "初期 滿洲語 辭典들에 대한 언어학적 연구", 알타이학보, 2, pp.27~69 (1990), 한국알타이학회
- 성백인, "만주어와 알타이어학 연구" (1999), 태학사
- 최동권, "구만주당 : 荒字檔" (2007), 보고사
- 閻崇年, "論 ≪滿洲老檔≫", 滿學硏究, 4, pp.1~84 (1998), 北京社會科學院滿學硏究所
- 齊木德道爾吉, "≪武皇帝實錄≫與≪舊檔≫的史料价値的分析", 25, pp.269~290 (2009), 한국몽골학회
- 中華書局, "淸實錄" (2008), 中華書局出版
- 최동권, "≪清太祖武皇帝實錄≫與≪舊滿洲糖≫史料比較究 -以內喀尔喀部史料爲主", 몽골학, (23), pp.29~76 (2007), 한국몽골학회
- 滿文老檔硏究會, "滿文老檔" (1955), 東洋文庫
- 上原 久, "滿洲實錄の硏究" (1960), 不昧堂
- 松村 潤, "淸太祖實錄の硏究" (2001), 東北アジア文獻硏究會
- 河內良弘, "滿洲語文語入門" (2002), 京都大學校學術出版會
