본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

City County Consolidation Efforts: Selective Incentives and Institutional Choice

박형준|강인성|Richard. C. Feiock
정부학연구소 (Institute of Governmental Studies)|2006.06|정부학연구 (Journal of Governmental Studies(JGS))|제12권 제1호|pp. 107-131

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

시-카운티 통합선택적 유인과 집단적 유인제도적 선택구역변경의 타협적 전략City County ConsolidationSelective and Collective IncentivesInstitutional Choice.
주제분류행정학

초록

미국의 도시지역이 직면한 다양한 문제들의 해결책으로서 정부간 통합의 요구가 증가되어왔고 이에 따라 시와-카운티 정부간의 통합 이슈는 많은 지역사회에서 중요한 아젠다가 되어왔다. 본 연구에서는 시와 카운티정부의 통폐합과 구역변경의 이론적 근거에 대한 진보적 관점, 신 진보적 관점과 선택적 유인에 관한 관점에서 살펴보고 이를 기초로 한 기존의 실증적인 연구결과들을 통해서 시군 통합의 효과가 기대이상이 아님을 살펴보았다. 또한 공공기업가의 선택적 유인에 따라 구역변경이 전략적 선택이 이루어짐을 살펴보고, 마지막으로 이를 바탕으로 구역변경의 타협적 전략과 행정구역개편의 일반모형을 통해서 구역개편과 정책결정간의 연결고리가 있음을 살펴보았다.

Abstract

There have been increased calls for governmental consolidation as a solution to the problems confronting urban areas. In the U.S., city-county consolidation issues have returned to a prominent place on agenda in many communities. If efforts to consolidate were typically successful or the performance of consolidated regional governments was consistently strong, this resurgence of interest in consolidation would not be an unexpected. What makes renewed interest in consolidation difficult to explain is that consolidation efforts are costly and contentious and the attempts meet failure about three-fourths of the time. In addition, the collective benefits promised for consolidation have not always been evident. This paper has offers an explanation for these phenomena based on the selective political incentives and strategic choices of reform entrepreneurs.

참고문헌 (64)

  1. Andrew, S, "Non-Profit Organizations and the Delivery of Public Service", 29(10) (2005)
  2. Andrew, Simon. A, "Interlocal Agreements as an Urban Management Tool" (2005)
  3. Barnes, W.R, "The new regional economics" (1998), Sage Publishing
  4. Benton, "City", county consolidation and economies of scale Evidence from a time series analysis in Jacksonville, 1984190~98, ~
  5. Bickers, K.N, "The microfoundations of the Tiebout model", 34, pp.76~93 (1998)
  6. Bish,R, "The political economy of metropolitan areas" (1971), Markham Press
  7. Blodgett, T, "Current city-county consolidation attempts" (1996), National Association of Counties
  8. Blomquist, W, "Fiscal, service, and political impacts of Indianapolis-Marion County's Unigov", 25(4), pp.37~54 (1995)
  9. Burns, "Formation of American Local Governments" (1994), Oxford University Press
  10. Burns. N, "The Politics of Cooperation", pp.~5 (1999)
  11. Buffalo News, "Push to consolidate" (2002)
  12. Carr, J.B, "Metropolitan government and economic development", 34(3), pp.476~488 (1999)
  13. Carr, J.B, "Who becomes involved in city-county consolidation? Findings from county officials in 25 communities", 34, pp.78~95 (2002)
  14. Carr, J. B, "Reshaping the local landscape" (2004), M.E. Sharpe
  15. Carr, J.B, "A war of words" (2002)
  16. Condrey, S.E, "Organizational and personnel impacts of city-county consolidation", 16, pp.371~383 (1994)
  17. Lowery, "A test of individual Journal of Politics 52", pp.807~837 (1990)
  18. Downs,A, "New visions for metropolitan America" (1994), The Brookings Institution
  19. Durning, D, "The effects of city-county government consolidation", pp.272~298 (1995)
  20. Erie S, "The study of local governance and policymaking" (1972)
  21. Feiock, R.C, "Progressive reformers pact with the devil" (2004), M.E. Sharpe
  22. Feiock, R.C, "Private incentives and academic entrepreneurs", 24(2), pp.265~245 (2000)
  23. Feiock, R.C, "Incentives, entrepreneurs, and boundary change", 36, pp.382~405 (2001)
  24. Feiock, R.C, "Structuring the Debate on Consolidation", 66(2), pp.274~278 (2006)
  25. Feiock, R.C, "Form of government, administrative organization, and local economic development policy", 11, pp.29~49 (2001)
  26. Feiock, R.C, "Regulatory reform and local economic development", 34(3), pp.153~159 (2002)
  27. Feiock, R.C, "The politics of institutional choice in metropolitan areas" (2004), Georgetown University Press
  28. Fleischmann, "The Goals and Strategies of Local Boundary Changes Government Organization or Private Gain? Journal of Urban Affairs 4" (1986)
  29. Fleischmann, "The Politics of Annexation A Preliminary Assessment of Competing Paradigms" (1986)
  30. Foster, K.A, "The Political Economy of Special-Purpose Government" (1997), Georgetown University Press
  31. Frant, H, "Reconsidering the Determinants of Public Authority Use", 7, pp.571~590 (1997)
  32. Grant, "A comparison of predictions and experience with Nashville 'Metro'" (1964)
  33. The Dade County experience, "The allocation and distributional impacts of governmental consolidation" (1977)
  34. Hawkins, "Governmental consolidation as a strategy for metropolitan development" (1991)
  35. Hill, "Government inequality in the metropolis" (1974)
  36. Johnson, L.S, "Regional governance through city-county consolidation" (2000)
  37. Johnson, L.S, "Making the Case for (and Against) City-County Consolidation", pp.246~290 (2004), M.E. Sharpe
  38. Knight, J, "Explaining Social Institutions" (1995), University of Michigan Press
  39. Knott, "The politics of institutional choice" (1987), Prentice Hall
  40. Thurmaier, K, "Frame the Consolidation Debate with a Sound Argument", 66(2), pp.279~280 (2006)
  41. Lewis, P, "An old debate confronts new realities" (2004), Georgetown UniversityPress
  42. Lindblom,C, "Politics and Markets" (1977), Basic Books
  43. Lowery, D, "Metropolitan governance structures from a neoprogressive perspective", 7(3), pp.130~136 (2001)
  44. Lowery, D, "A transaction costs model of metropolitan governance", 10, pp.49~78 (2000)
  45. Marando, "The Politics of Metropolitan Reform" (1974)
  46. McCabe, B.C, "Special District Formation Among the States", 32, pp.121~131 (2000)
  47. Mead, "The Daily Newspaper as Political Agenda Setter" (1994)
  48. Miller, "Cities by Contract The Politics of Municipal Incorporation Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press" (1981)
  49. Miller, D, "The fiscal organization of metropolitan areas", 25(4), pp.19~35 (1995)
  50. Oakerson, R.J, "Governing local public economies" (1999), ICS Press
  51. Olberding, J.C, "Does regionalism beget regionalism? The relationship between norms and regional partnerships for economic development", 62, pp.480~491 (2002)
  52. Oliver, J.E, "Democracy in suburbia" (2001), Princeton University Press
  53. Porter, "A Useful Technique for Financing Infrastructure" (1992)
  54. Rogers, "Citizen evaluations of performances in Nashville-Davidson County", pp.~4
  55. Rusk, "Cities without suburbs" (1993), Woodrow Wilson Center Press
  56. Rosenbaum, "The Theory and Practice of Successful Governmental Consolidation" (1974)
  57. Shrestha, Manoj, "The Evolution of Policy Networks for Delivering Local Services" (2006)
  58. Savitch, H.V, "Regional politics", 45 (1996), Sage Publishing
  59. Savitch, H.V, "Paths to new regionalism", 12, pp.158~168 (2000)
  60. Schneider, "The political economy of suburbia University of Pittsburgh Press" (1989)
  61. Schneider, M, "Public entrepreneurs" (1995), Princeton Princeton University Press
  62. Seamon, F, "Political participation and city", county consolidation, 1995, pp.18, 1741~1752
  63. Teske, "Establishing the micro foundations of a macro theory and the competitive local market for public goods" (1993)
  64. Thurmaier, K, "Interlocal Agreements as an Alternative to Consolidation" (2004), M.E.Shape.

관련 논문AI추천

미국 메트로폴리탄 지역에서의 신지역주의 경향: 통합지역정부와 지역 거버넌스를 위한 대안적 제도들박형준, 리차드 파이악국토연구원 · 국토연구2006 · 제51권 제4호시군통합정책의 합리성과 숨겨진 정책의도최창수한국지방자치학회 · 한국지방자치학회보2014 · 제26권 제1호지방행정체제개편에 관한 이론적 검토김석태(재) 한국지방행정연구원 · 지방행정연구2010 · 제24권 제4호1990년대 시군통합과정 분석을 통한 행정구역 변화기제 연구주경일(재) 한국지방행정연구원 · 지방행정연구2005 · 제19권 제2호행정구역 자율통합정책의 비판적 고찰한표환(재) 한국지방행정연구원 · 지방행정연구2013 · 제27권 제3호시군통합 모형의 이론적 고찰을 통한 시군통합의 한계 탐색: 2단계 C3 모형과 제도적 집단행동모형을 중심으로박형준한국지방자치학회 · 한국지방자치학회보2013 · 제25권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

다산(茶山)의 인사행정개혁에 대한 이해송하중 김태영pp. 7-29다산의 관료제 기구 존폐론을 통한 조직관 분석정재동pp. 31-60다산의 경학사상에 나타나는 조직이론 연구 - 버렐과 모건의 사회학적 준거틀을 적용하여 -김성현pp. 61-82다산의 생산적 복지이념 및 정책조성한pp. 83-106중국정부의 지역개발정책 수행에 따른 지역간 효율성 변화 분석장캉즈, 서운석pp. 133-161
원문 보기