中國의 『尙書』僞篇 論爭과 『尙書講義』의 僞『書』 論議

Abstract

After investigating chinese ShangShu’s writings owned by KyuJangKak, it was identified that a lot of writings on ShangShu such as ancient manuscripts, ancient comments, and false ancient manuscripts have existed. Accodingly, this paper takes a notice of SangSeoKangYi which was produced by KyuJangKak’s lecture activities and has discussions on special doubtable disputes in Choson’s the confucianism scriptures history is included in. Since having a doubt of the confucianism scriptures itself was tabooed in Choson dynasty, the confucianists attempted to preserve the holy study and practice daoxue on the strength of the existing researchs and Zhou-Zi’ authority externally. Moreover, they sought to repress No-Ron forces’s repression and the royal power’s reinforcement internally. There sere debates on imitation of ancient manuscript continuously advancing in china and they had scientific and exhaustive achievements. Nevertheless, it is pitiful that king Jeong-Jo’s debates on forgeries appeared in SangSeoKangYi only reconfirmed neo-confucianism’s basic perspectives. However, interest in ancient manuscripts and research on chinese classics, which were triggered by Chosun king’s KyuJangKak SangSeoKangYi, were secceeded by SeokCheon Sin Jak and DaSan Jeong Yak Yong, and left an outstanding trace in Chosun’s chinese classics history.