현대 중국의 전략문화와 전쟁수행방식:전통적 전략문화와의 역속성과 변화를 중심으로
Strategic Culture of the Modern Chinaand Way of War
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research deals with what strategic culture of modern China has been and how it has been reflected in contemporary wars. Firstly, I will review current debates on Chinese strategic culture and suggest some points to analyse Chinese strategic culture. Next, I will examine Mao Tse-dung's strategy and the Chinese Civil War to figure out the origin of modern China's strategy. Then, the Sino-Vietnamese War in 1979 which was the most recent war of China will be studied as a case to prove the validity of those hypotheses suggested. It would be undeniable that China has had the strategic culture of Confucian-Mencius Paradigm which was based on Confucianism. China has shown its tendency to limit the use of force and consider war as a last resort in the Korean War, the Sino-India War, and the Sino-Vietnamese War. And, China has regarded the use of force as a means to achieve political purpose. However, while those strategic behaviors are totally consistent with Confucian-Mencius Paradigm in appearance, they seem to have fundamentally different context with the strategic culture of the past Chinese empire. That is, the Modern China's Strategy has been the Weaker's Strategy to counter the stronger enemies like the US and the Soviet Union, not the Empire's Strategy to deal with the weak neighboring states. China's strategy, therefore, even though it has continuity of traditional strategic culture of Confucianism, can be best understood as mixed with the realistic Para-bellum Paradigm to overcome its vulnerability of weakness.
Abstract
This research deals with what strategic culture of modern China has been and how it has been reflected in contemporary wars. Firstly, I will review current debates on Chinese strategic culture and suggest some points to analyse Chinese strategic culture. Next, I will examine Mao Tse-dung's strategy and the Chinese Civil War to figure out the origin of modern China's strategy. Then, the Sino-Vietnamese War in 1979 which was the most recent war of China will be studied as a case to prove the validity of those hypotheses suggested. It would be undeniable that China has had the strategic culture of Confucian-Mencius Paradigm which was based on Confucianism. China has shown its tendency to limit the use of force and consider war as a last resort in the Korean War, the Sino-India War, and the Sino-Vietnamese War. And, China has regarded the use of force as a means to achieve political purpose. However, while those strategic behaviors are totally consistent with Confucian-Mencius Paradigm in appearance, they seem to have fundamentally different context with the strategic culture of the past Chinese empire. That is, the Modern China's Strategy has been the Weaker's Strategy to counter the stronger enemies like the US and the Soviet Union, not the Empire's Strategy to deal with the weak neighboring states. China's strategy, therefore, even though it has continuity of traditional strategic culture of Confucianism, can be best understood as mixed with the realistic Para-bellum Paradigm to overcome its vulnerability of weakness.
참고문헌 (39)
- 이내주, "전략문화와 세계 각국의 전쟁수행 방식", pp.12~32 (2007), 화랑대연구소
- B. H. Liddell Hart, "Forward. in: The Art of War", pp.5~7 (1976), Buccaneer Books
- Michael I. Handel, "Master of War: Classical Strategic Thought", pp.33~39 (2001), Frank Cass
- John K. Fairbank, "Varieties of the Chinese Military Experience. in: Chinese Ways in Warfare" (1974), Harvard University Press
- Alastair Iain Johnston, "Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History" (1995), Princeton University Press
- Alastair Iain Johnston, "Chinese Militarized Interstate Dispute Behavior 1949-1992: A First Cut at the Data", The China Quarterly, 153, pp.14~17 (1998)
- Howard L. Boorman, "Strategy and National Psychology in China", The Annals, 370, pp.152~ (1967)
- Jeffrey S. Lantis, "Strategic Culture. in: Strategy in the Contemporary World", pp.88~ (2007), Oxford University Press
- Edward S. Boylan, "The Chinese Cultural Style of Warfare", Comparative Strategy, 3(4), pp.342~346 (1982)
- Gerald Segan, "Defense Culture and Sino-Soviet Relations", Journal of Strategic Studies, 8, pp.180~ (1985)
- Tiejun Zhang, "Chinese Strategic Culture", Comparative Strategy, 21 (2002)
- Allen Whiting, "China Crosses the Yalu: The Decision to Enter the Korean War", pp.151~162 (1960), Stanford University Press
- Andrew Scobell, "China's Use of Military Force: Beyond the Great Wall and the Long March", pp.38~ (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Arthur Waldron, "Chinese Strategy from the Fourteenth to the Seventeenth Centuries. in: The Making of Strategy: Rulers, States, and War", pp.88~ (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Changhee Park, "Why China Attacks: China's Geostrategic Vulnerability and Its Military Intervention", The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 20(3), pp.263~267 (2008)
- Robert Ross, "The Indochina Tangle: China's Vietnam Policy, 1975-1979" (1988), Columbia University Press
- 박창희, "전략의 패러독스 : 비대칭전쟁에서의‘결전’과‘약자의 승리’", 한국정치학회보, 43(1), pp.323~343 (2009), 한국정치학회
- T. V. Paul, "Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers", pp.13~ (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Edward L. Katzenbach, Jr., "The Revolutionary Strategy of Mao Tse-tung", Political Science Quarterly, 70(3), pp.327~328 (1955)
- Mao Tse-tung, "Problems of Strategy in China's Revolutionary War. in: Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. 1" (1967), Foreign Languages Press
- Mao Tse-tung, "On Protracted War. in: Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. 1" (1967), Foreign Languages Press
- Mao Tse-tung, "On Coalition Government. in: Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Vol. 1", pp.213~217 (1967), Foreign Languages Press
- G.B. Ernburg, "Ocherki Natsional'no-osvoboditel'noi Bor'by Kitaiskogo Narada", pp.227~ (1951)
- F. F. Liu, "A Military History of Modern China, 1924-1949", pp.254~ (1956), Princeton University Press
- 中國國防大學, "中國人民解放軍戰史簡編", pp.517~518 (2001), 解放軍出版社
- Suzanne Pepper, "The KMT-CCP Conflict, 1945-1949. in: The Nationalist Era in China, 1927-1949" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Department of State, "United States Relations With China: With Special Reference to the Period 1944-1949", 318~ (1949)
- Mao Zedong, "The Concept of Operation for the Liaohsi-Shenyang Campaign. in: Selected Works of Mao Zedong, Vol. 4" (1967), Foreign Languages Press
- Steven J. Hood, "Dragons Entangled Indochina and the China-Vietnam War", pp.44~ (1992), M.E. Sharpe
- Marilyn B. Young, "The Vietnam Wars, 1945-1990" (1991), Harper Perennial
- Mao Zedong and Le Duan, Beijing, 24 Sep 1975. in: 77 Conversations between Chinese and Foreign Leaders on the Wars in Indochina, "Arne Westad", CWIHP, 194~, pp.Working Paper No. 22
- Bruce A. Elleman, "Modern Chinese Warfare, 1795-1989" (2001), Routledge
- 軍事科學院軍事歷史硏究所, "中華人民共和國軍事史要", pp.486~ (2005), 軍事科學出版社
- Daniel Tretiak, "China's Vietnam War and its Consequences", The China Quarterly, (80) (1979)
- Henry J. Kenny, "Vietnamese Perceptions of the 1979 War with China. in: Chinese Warfighting: The PLA Experience since 1949" (2003), M.E. Sharpe
- Brantly Womack, "China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry", pp.170~ (2006), Cambridge University Press
- New York Times, "New York Times, 31 January 1979. quoted in Daniel Tretiak, 'China's Vietnam War and its Consequences'", 743~ (1979)
- 中共中央黨史硏究室, "中國共産黨歷史大事記", pp.305~ (2006), 中央黨史出版社
- 李寶俊, "當代中國外交槪論", pp.177~ (2006), 中國人民大學出版社