Factors Influencing the Success of Participatory E government Applications in Romania and South Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
While participatory e-government is increasingly advocated, few studies have investigated whether it is feasible across all national contexts. This study investigates how certain contextual features influence the success of participatory applications of e-government. In particular, it assesses how the political, economic, and social context in which a particular government operates influence the introduction of participatory e-government, and compares participatory e-government applications in Romania and South Korea. These nations possess important similarities and differences in their political, social, and economic contexts. The study results suggest that the success of participatory e-government projects is to a large extent contingent upon political and economic factors and less related to social factors.
Abstract
While participatory e-government is increasingly advocated, few studies have investigated whether it is feasible across all national contexts. This study investigates how certain contextual features influence the success of participatory applications of e-government. In particular, it assesses how the political, economic, and social context in which a particular government operates influence the introduction of participatory e-government, and compares participatory e-government applications in Romania and South Korea. These nations possess important similarities and differences in their political, social, and economic contexts. The study results suggest that the success of participatory e-government projects is to a large extent contingent upon political and economic factors and less related to social factors.
참고문헌 (54)
- Ahn, M. J., "Politics of e-government: E-government and the political control of bureaucracy", Public Administration Review, 71, pp.414~424 (2011)
- Badescu, G., "Historical legacies, social capital and civil society: Comparing Romania on a regional level", Europe-Asia Studies, 57(1), pp.117~133 (2005)
- Brewer, G. A., "Designing and implementing e-government systems: Critical implications for public administration and democracy", Administration & Society, 38(4), pp.472~499 (2006)
- The World Factbook, "CIA(Central Intelligence Agency)", ~ (2011)
- Chadwick, A., "Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: “e-government” in the United States, Britain and the European Union", Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 16, pp.271~300 (2003)
- "E-guvernare web portal, home page" (2012)[URL]
- Dahl, R., "Democracy and its critics" (1989), Yale University Press
- Danziger, J. N., "The impacts of information technology on public administration: An analysis of empirical research from the “golden age” of transformation", International Journal of Public Administration, 25(5), pp.591~627 (2002)
- Denhardt, R. B., "The new public service: Serving rather than steering", Public Administration Review, 60(6), pp.549~559 (2000)
- The 2006 e-readiness rankings: A white paper paper from The Economist Intelligence Unit, "E. I. U. (The Economist Intelligence Unit)", ~ (2006)
- Fiol, C. M., "Organizational learning", Academy of Management Review, 10(4), pp.803~812 (1985)
- Fountain, J., "Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change" (2001), Brookings Institute
- Freedom in the world 2011: The authoritarian challenge to democracy, "Freedom House", ~ (2011)
- Gerodimos, R., "Democracy and the Internet: Access, engagement and deliberation", Systematics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 3(6), pp.26~31 (2006)
- Halachmi, A., "Performance measurement and government productivity", Work Study, 51(2), pp.63~73 (2002)
- Halachmi, A., "Performance measurement is only one way of measuring performance", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(7), pp.502~516 (2005)
- "Most egovernment-for-development projects fail: How can risks be reduced?" (2003)[URL]
- Heeks, R., "E-government as a carrier of context", Journal of Public Policy, 25, pp.51~74 (2005)
- Ho, A., "Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative", Public Administration Review, 62(4), pp.434~444 (2002)
- Ho, A., "Explaining the adoption of e-government features: A case study of Iowa County Treasurers’ Offices", American Review of Public Administration, 34(2), pp.164~180 (2004)
- Im, T., "ICT as a buffer to change: A case study of the Seoul Metropolitan Government’s Dasan Call Center", Public Performance and Management Review
- Measuring the information society, "ITU(International Telecommunications Union)", ~ (2011)
- Irvin, R. A., "Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?", Public Administration Review, 64(1), pp.55~65 (2004)
- Kraemer, K. L., "Information technology and administrative reform: Will e-government be different?", International Journal of Electronic Government, 2(1), pp.1~18 (2006)
- Kumar, R., "Impact and sustainability of e-government services in developing countries: Lessons learned from Tamil Nadu, India", The Information Society, 22, pp.1~12 (2006)
- 이정우, "Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model", GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 18(2), pp.122~136
- Lee, A. -R., "Down and down we go: Trust and compliance in South Korea", Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), pp.329~343 (2003)
- Lipsky, M., "Street level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform", Urban Affairs Review, 6(4), pp.391~409 (1971)
- Macintosh, A., "Characterizing e-participation in policy making", Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (2004), IEEE
- Michels, A., "Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy?", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), pp.275~293 (2011)
- Moon, M. J., "Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or hare?", Public Administration Review, 65(1), pp.64~75 (2005)
- E-government plans for 21st century, "MOPAS(Ministry of Public Administration and Security)", ~ (2011)
- Neshkova, M. I., "Public participation and organizational performance: Evidence from state agencies", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), pp.267~288 (2011)
- Norris, D. F., "Building the virtual state . . . or not: A critical appraisal", Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), pp.417~424 (2003)
- Peters, G.B., "Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Co-Ordination", Public Administration, 76(2), pp.295~311 (1998)
- Pollitt, C, "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Second Edition" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Popescu, D., "Chaos in the strategies and e-governance system of Romania", ASSI Public Declaration, ~ (2010)
- Sandor, S. D., "Romania’s digital divide and the failures of e-government", Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 16, pp.154~162 (2006)
- Sandor, S. D., "E-government in Romania, In One-stop-Europe: Citizen centered government", pp.5~10 (2007), Alcatel-Lucent Stiftung
- Sen, A., "What Lee Kuan Yew and Ling Peng Don’t Understand about Asia: Human Rights and Asian Values", The New Republic, 217, pp.33~40 (1997)
- Silvestru, C., "Analysis of requirements and design approaches for Romania from the perspective of the EU services directive", Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 26, pp.170~188 (2009)
- Snellen, I., "E-government: A challenge for public management, In The Oxford handbook of public management" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Stivers, C., "The public agency as polis: Active citizenship in the administrative state", Administration and Society, 22(1), pp.86~105 (1990)
- Thomas, C., "Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees", Administration and Society, 30(2), pp.166~193 (1998)
- Tolbert, C., "Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation", Political Research Quarterly, 56, pp.175~185 (2002)
- UN, "Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective" (2001), United Nations Publications
- United Nations egovernment survey 2008: From e-government to connected governance, "UNPAN(United Nations Public Administration Network)", ~ (2010)
- Uslaner, E., "September. Coping and social capital: The informal sector and the democratic transition", Paper presented at the conference Unlocking Human Potential: Linking the Formal and Informal Sectors, Helsinki (2004)
- Vu, K.M., "E-government and Business Competitiveness: A Policy Review", Vietnam Competitiveness Initiative, ~ (2005)
- 문명재, "Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government", JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 15(3), pp.371~391
- Yang G., "The Internet and civil society in China: A preliminary assessment", Journal of Contemporary China, 12, pp.453~475 (2003)
- Yildiz, M., "E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward", Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), pp.646~665 (2007)
- Zahan, E, "Priorities for e-government in European transforming countries: Example of Romania", International Conference on e-Government, University of Quebec at Montreal, Canada (2007), Academic Conferences Limited
- Zanello, G., "Strengthening citizen agency and accountability through ICT", Public Management Review, 13(3), pp.363~382 (2011)
