본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Process of Conflict Resolution in Public Project Disputes

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정책학

초록

This study examines thirteen recent public dispute cases in Korea with the objective of analyzing the process of conflict resolution and thereby assessing the role of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in public disputes. The focus is on dispute cases related to development of, or site selection for, public projects. Based on detailed accounts of events, the nature of the conflict, parties involved, pattern of actions taken, and final outcomes are analyzed. Only five cases were settled by ADR methods, indicating that ADR is rather ineffective in public conflicts. ADR seems to work better in locally confined, structured conflicts where participatory processes are used. An identifiable pattern in attempts at ADR is that ad-hoc committees are formed but often fail to reach agreement or are seen as lacking legitimacy, authority, and impartiality. Policy implications drawn from this study are that a higher priority should be given to developing community-based conflict resolution programs, that ADR should be incorporated into local government regulations to acquire greater legitimacy, and that conflict prevention procedures are a prerequisite for the success of conflict resolution programs.

Abstract

This study examines thirteen recent public dispute cases in Korea with the objective of analyzing the process of conflict resolution and thereby assessing the role of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in public disputes. The focus is on dispute cases related to development of, or site selection for, public projects. Based on detailed accounts of events, the nature of the conflict, parties involved, pattern of actions taken, and final outcomes are analyzed. Only five cases were settled by ADR methods, indicating that ADR is rather ineffective in public conflicts. ADR seems to work better in locally confined, structured conflicts where participatory processes are used. An identifiable pattern in attempts at ADR is that ad-hoc committees are formed but often fail to reach agreement or are seen as lacking legitimacy, authority, and impartiality. Policy implications drawn from this study are that a higher priority should be given to developing community-based conflict resolution programs, that ADR should be incorporated into local government regulations to acquire greater legitimacy, and that conflict prevention procedures are a prerequisite for the success of conflict resolution programs.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Amy,D.J, "Environmental dispute resolution: The promise and the pitfalls" (1990), Washington, DC: CQ Press
  2. Arrow, K. J, "Barriers to conflict resolution" (1995), New York: W.W. Norton & Company
  3. Baeg,J, "A study on the memorial park in Seoul metropolitan", Korean Society and Public Administration, 13(2), pp.191~216 (2002)
  4. Birkhoff, J. E, "Whose reality counts?" (2003), Washington, DC: Resources for the Future
  5. 최흥석, "사회적 갈등의 근거이론적 이해: 댐건설을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 37(4), pp.169~191 (2003), 한국행정학회
  6. Chun,J, "Political economy of Saemangeum tideland reclamation project through advocacy coalition framework", Korean Society and Public Administration, 14(2), pp.207~234 (2003)
  7. Deutsch,M, "The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes" (1973), New Haven: Yale University Press
  8. Emerson, K, "The challenges of environmental conflict resolution" (2003), Washington, DC: Resources for the Future
  9. Fisher, R, "Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in" (1991), New York: Penguin Books
  10. Fiss,O.M, "Against settlement", The Yale Law Journal, 93, pp.1073~1090 (1984)
  11. Glasbergen,P, "Managing environmental disputes: Network management as an alternative" (1995), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  12. Jeon,J, "An analysis on the structure of locational conflicts: Focused on the case of Kangnam incinerator", Korean Society and Public Administration, 13(3), pp.239~263 (2002)
  13. 진종순, "조직의 내부결속력과 갈등행태: 김포수도권매립지를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 38(6), pp.71~91 (2004), 한국행정학회
  14. 주재복, "정부조직간 정책갈등의 조정기제와 협력규칙-동강댐건설사례와 새만금간척사업사례의 비교연구-", 한국행정연구, 13(3), pp.51~84 (2004), 한국행정연구원
  15. 주재복, "수자원 개발의 이해갈등과 정책조정기제의 변화: 영월댐 개발을 둘러싼 중앙부처간 대응행동을 중심으로", 지방행정연구, 17(1), pp.241~267 (2003), 한국지방행정연구원
  16. Jung,J, "Group conflict and government: A case study on the conflict over development and conservation Saemangeum tideland reclamation project", The Korea Public Administration Journal, 9(4), pp.79~104 (2000)
  17. Kim,C, "An analysis on the implementation factors affecting national projects: Focusing on the tideland reclamation project of Saemangeum", Korean Society and Public Administration, 13(1), pp.53~80 (2002)
  18. Kim,D, "study on the conflict raising factors of siting conflict between local government and public: The siting conflict case of Ulsan nuclear power plant", Korean Policy Studies Review, 10(1), pp.165~189 (2001)
  19. Kim, D., "A study on the factors of conflict corresponding to procedural stages in the location policy of unfavorable facilities: Cases of conflict in siting waste treatment facilities", The Summer Conference of the Korean Association for Public Administration, pp.599~616 (2001)
  20. Kim,H, "The role of citizen participation in siting unwanted public facilities", Korean Review of Public Administration, 2(2), pp.277~296 (1997)
  21. Kim,K, "A study on resident resistance in the process of policy implementation: The case for siting of Buan nuclear waste repository", Policy Studies Review, 13(5), pp.159~185 (2004)
  22. Kim,P, "Efficient solution of dispute in the unwanted facility: The case of the Goon Po garbage incinerator", Negotiation Studies, 6(1), pp.93~105 (2000)
  23. Kwon,Y, "study on siting of a waste incineration plant", The Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education Journal, 6(2), pp.71~93 (1998)
  24. Lan,Z, "conflict resolution approach to public administration", Public Administration Review, 57(1), pp.27~35 (1997)
  25. Lee, J, "Conflict analysis between local governments and its management strategies in regional development: A case study of Taegu city’s Wichon industrial site", Korean Policy Review, 7(3), pp.159~188 (1998)
  26. Mitchell, C, "Handbook of conflict resolution. New York: Pinter Park, H. (2000). The impact of group conflict on public policy: The case of the Goon Po garbage incinerator", Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association, 14(1), pp.194~212 (1996)
  27. Park,J, "A study on the current status and the development of Saemangeum tideland reclamation project", Journal of Social Science of Chon Buk University, 25, pp.147~168 (1999)
  28. Pedersen, P. B, "Culturally contextual models for creative conflict management" (1996), Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications
  29. Presidential Commission on Sustainable Development, "research report on establishment of conflict management system", Seoul: PCSD, ~ (2004)
  30. Raiffa,H, "The art and science of negotiatio" (1982), Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
  31. Ross,M.H, "The management of conflict: Interpretations and interests in comparative perspective" (1993), New Haven: Yale University Press
  32. Rubin,J.Z, "Some wise and mistaken assumptions about conflict and negotiation" (1995), Cambridge, MA: Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School
  33. Soh,Y, "The social conditions of dilemma: A case of Wichon national industrial complex", Korean Public Administration Review, 33(1), pp.185~205 (1999)
  34. 임정빈, "비선호시설 설치를 둘러싼 지방정부간 갈등 연구: 청주·청원광역쓰레기매립장 조성사업을 중심으로", 한국정책과학학회보, 8(1), pp.291~318 (2004), 한국정책과학학회
  35. Yoo, T, "The Sapaesan tunnel of Seoul beltway", Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 52(5), pp.15~25 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)