본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

도시관광기관간 협력적 거버넌스 분석을 위한 탐색적 연구

Exploratory Study on the Collaborative Governance Between Urban Tourism Agencies

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류관광학

초록

In a tendency of the globalization in which competitions among cities are intensified, small and medium cities establish and develop several policies for activation through the tourism. The purpose of this study is to analyze governance systems of tourism marketing agencies engaging in urban tourism marketing. And tasks are under the premise that it is very important to increase efficiencies of tourism marketing by gathering strengths of stockholders. Based on a literature analysis of the collaborative governance of the urban tourism and a state analysis of characteristics and functions of tasks by themes of agencies promoting tourism marketing in Gwangju Metropolitan city, their cooperative relations, types of governance and forms of it are analyzed. The range and subjects of this study are Gwangju Metropolitan City Hall, Gwangju Convention&Visitors Bureau, Kimdaejung Convention Center, Gwangju Culture Foundation and Gwangju Tourism Association. And as a survey method, depth interviews were implemented. The findings are summarized and arranged: The networks between Gwangju tourism marketing agencies are 'loosely connected network type' and 'star network type' . And the early state of governance, the agencies perform individual businesses rather than joint project developments. Moreover, there are overlapped tasks between them, and tourism information are individually created and managed. Sufficient confidential relations are not established. Authorities in the agencies responded that their roles should be divided according to a common purpose for the collaborative governance, and they must be autonomous and responsible and trust each others. And a compensation for cost and effect derived from their collaborations, and fair distributions of outputs are thought to be important. On the basis of such results of analysis, the ideal Gwangju-type network suggested and an implication of it is induced.

Abstract

In a tendency of the globalization in which competitions among cities are intensified, small and medium cities establish and develop several policies for activation through the tourism. The purpose of this study is to analyze governance systems of tourism marketing agencies engaging in urban tourism marketing. And tasks are under the premise that it is very important to increase efficiencies of tourism marketing by gathering strengths of stockholders. Based on a literature analysis of the collaborative governance of the urban tourism and a state analysis of characteristics and functions of tasks by themes of agencies promoting tourism marketing in Gwangju Metropolitan city, their cooperative relations, types of governance and forms of it are analyzed. The range and subjects of this study are Gwangju Metropolitan City Hall, Gwangju Convention&Visitors Bureau, Kimdaejung Convention Center, Gwangju Culture Foundation and Gwangju Tourism Association. And as a survey method, depth interviews were implemented. The findings are summarized and arranged: The networks between Gwangju tourism marketing agencies are 'loosely connected network type' and 'star network type' . And the early state of governance, the agencies perform individual businesses rather than joint project developments. Moreover, there are overlapped tasks between them, and tourism information are individually created and managed. Sufficient confidential relations are not established. Authorities in the agencies responded that their roles should be divided according to a common purpose for the collaborative governance, and they must be autonomous and responsible and trust each others. And a compensation for cost and effect derived from their collaborations, and fair distributions of outputs are thought to be important. On the basis of such results of analysis, the ideal Gwangju-type network suggested and an implication of it is induced.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 강신겸, "지역관광개발에서의 이해관계자 유형 및 협력과정에 관한 연구", 관광연구논총, 11, pp.44~59 (1999)
  2. 강신겸, "생태관광개발에 대한 지역사회내 이해관계 분석", 농어촌관광연구, 12(2), pp.53~71 (2005)
  3. 강순화, "메가이벤트 개최에 따른 이해관계자간의 관광 거버넌스 형성요인 인식에 관한 비교연구", 한국비교정부학보, 18(3), pp.161~188 (2014), 한국비교정부학회
  4. 강인구, "관광개발에 따른 공공갈등 관리방안에 관한 연구 : DMZ 안보관광 개발을 중심으로", 박사, 관광경영학, pp.2010
  5. 강정길, "LOHAS중심의 관광 레저형(기업)도시 개발방안", 한국외식산업학회지, 4(1), pp.35~57 (2008), 한국외식산업학회
  6. 강황선, "정부중재형 거버넌스 체제의 운영전략에 관한 연구", 한국사회와 행정연구, 14(3), pp.201~227 (2003)
  7. 김병진, "님비(NIMBY) 극복을 위한 환경정책-상계동과 산본쓰레기 소각장 사례-", 정책분석평가학회보, 4, pp.23~47 (1994)
  8. 김석준, "뉴거버넌스 연구" (2000), 대영문화사
  9. 김영준, "관광개발 갈등과정과 인과관계 분석", 박사, 여가관광개발학, pp.2007
  10. 김용근, "(마을공동사업의 이해와) 갈등관리" (2011), 해남
  11. 시군구 유형별 민관협력체계 실태 및 발전모형에 관한 연구, "김필두", 한국지방행정연구원, ~ (2008)
  12. 김향자, "특집 도시관광의 새로운 전개: 우리나라 도시관광의 과제와 전망", 도시문제 (2005)
  13. 도시관광 활성화 정책 추진방안, "김향자", 한국문화관광연구원, ~ (2011)
  14. 도경록, "지역관광 거버넌스의 평가와 개선방안 - 경북관광포럼을 중심으로 -", 관광연구논총, 23(1), pp.213~235 (2011), 관광연구소
  15. 문성민, "커뮤니티관광개발에서의 이해집단 간 신뢰와 의사소통의 관계", 박사, 관광학, pp.2008
  16. 신중목, "관광 NPO 와 정부 간 협력관계에서의 인식의 차이", 관광연구논총, 19(2), pp.133~152 (2007)
  17. 심창섭, "도시관광에서의 진정성 개념에 관한 탐색적 고찰", 관광연구논총, 24(3), pp.33~56 (2012), 관광연구소
  18. 양승희, "도시관광광 이미지요소가 외래관광객 선택행동에 미치는 영향 연구", 박사, pp.2010
  19. 양현모, "지방자치단체간 협력을 위한 행정협의회 활성화방안- 영산강유역권행정협의회?섬진강환경행정협의회 사례를 중심으로 -", 한국지방자치학회보, 15(4), pp.175~194 (2003), 한국지방자치학회
  20. 오수경, "장소마케팅을 통한 서울시 도시관광 진흥방안", 관광경영연구, 13(4), pp.161~181 (2009), 관광경영학회
  21. 유정우, "지속가능 관광개발의 파트너십 및 네트워크와관광거버넌스 간의 구조관계 연구", 관광학연구, 32(3), pp.37~60 (2008), 한국관광학회
  22. 이명석, "협력적 거버넌스와 정부의 역할: 사회적 기업 사례를 중심으로", 한국정책학회보, 18(4), pp.145~172 (2009), 한국정책학회
  23. 이연택, "관광정책학" (2012), 백산출판사
  24. 이장춘, "관광정책학" (1996), 대왕사
  25. 이정원, "한식이미지와 국가이미지의 관계 - 중국 관광객을 대상으로 -", 한국외식산업학회지, 10(4), pp.69~80 (2014), 한국외식산업학회[DOI]
  26. 이태수, "사회복지전달체계의 개편과 민관협력" (2010), 학지사
  27. 이희정, "역사문화환경 정비에서의 갈등해소를 위한 협력적 거버넌스 구축에 관한 연구 - 서촌지역 내 주택재개발 구역을 중심으로", 국토계획, 50(3), pp.23~37 (2015), 대한국토·도시계획학회
  28. 예명숙, "부산의 도시 환경요인, 가치지각이 도시 관광이미지 및 만족에 미치는 영향", 한국관광학회 학술대회 발표논문집, pp.317~335 (2005)
  29. 장병권, "관광체계론(2): 한국관광발전과 정부개입의 적정성", 관광연구논총, 3, pp.173~206 (1991)
  30. 조중현, "마을 공동사업 추진과정에서 표출된 주민 간 갈등의 근거 이론적 해석 : 농촌체험마을 주민 간 갈등사례를 중심으로", 박사, 조경학, pp.2007
  31. 갈등유형별 협력적 로컬거버넌스의 구축방안, "주재복", 한국지방행정연구원, ~ (2006)
  32. 최경지, "커뮤니티 기반 관광의 지속가능성 지표개발과 지역관광 발전방안", 석사, pp.2014
  33. 최민우, "행정기관 협력을 통한 지역 관광활성화 방안", 김구논총, 7(1), pp.131~141 (1999)
  34. 지역관광발전 추진체계 개선방안 연구, "최자은", 한국문화관광연구원, ~ (2013)
  35. 표성수, "최신 관광계획개발론" (1994), 형설출판사
  36. 홍기춘, "농수산물 의제매입세액공제 정책변동 연구 - 정책네트워크모형의 적용을 중심으로 -", 한국외식산업학회지, 10(3), pp.65~73 (2014), 한국외식산업학회
  37. 森下慶子, "「都市觀光」は日本の都市を育てる力", Weekly Travel Journal (2000)
  38. Ashworth, G., "Urban tourism research: Recent progress and current paradoxes", Tourism Management, 32, pp.1~15 (2011)
  39. Bryson, J. M., "Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world" (1992), Jossey-Bass
  40. Caffyn, A., "Governance capacity and stakeholder interactions in the development and management of coastal tourism: examples from Morocco and Tunisia", Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 11(2-3), pp.224~245 (2003)
  41. Hardcastle, D., "Community practice: Theories and skills for social workers" (1997)
  42. Henton, D., "Collaborative governance: A guide for grantmakers" (2005), William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
  43. Law, C. M., "Urban tourism and its contribution to economic regeneration", Urban Studies, 29(3, pp.4) (1992), 599~618
  44. Law, C. M., "Urban tourism: attracting visitors to large cities" (1993), Mansell Publishing Limited
  45. Kooiman, J., "Governing as governance" (2003), Sage
  46. McNulty, C. A., "Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Campylobacter pyloridis to 11 antimicrobial agents", Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 28(6), pp.837~838 (1985)
  47. Murphy, "Tourism: A Community Approach" (1985), Methuen
  48. Page, S. J., "Urban Tourism" (1995)
  49. Pearce, D. G., "An integrative framework for urban tourism research", Annals of Tourism Research, 28(4), pp.926~946 (2001)
  50. Sautter, E. T., "Managing stakeholders a tourism planning model", Annals of tourism research, 26(2), pp.312~328 (1999)
  51. Shergold, P., "Governing through collaboration", Collaborative Governance, 13 (2008)
  52. Thomson, A. M., "Collaboration processes: Inside the black box", Public administration review, 66(s1), pp.20~32 (2006)
  53. Tkaczynski, A., "Segmentation: A tourism stakeholder view", Tourism Management, 30(2), pp.169~175 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)