위기 커뮤니케이션과 언론보도 프레임 - 수사학적 체계 중심으로 -
Crisis Communications and Reporting Frames : The Analysis of Apologetic Communications for the Shooting Incident by Department of Defense
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of the study is to describe the types of crisis communications and to investigate the level of acceptance by publics against crisis communications interacting with reporting frames. Both content analysis and an experiment were conducted to answer the research questions. According to the results of content analysis, crisis communications were utilized differently by newspapers and varied by reporting frames. Crisis communications were used in order: denial > repair > diminish communications. And newspapers focused on different crisis communications following their reporting ideologies. The experiment showed that research participants accepted repair communications more than diminish and denial communica- tions. The results also confirmed that reporting frames influenced the acceptance level of crisis communications. When thematic frames were used, the acceptance level of crisis communications was higher than any other frames. These results imply that the current level of communication acceptance must be very low because episodic frames are mainly used in reality. Research implications were discussed for raising the effectiveness of crisis communications based on the research results.
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to describe the types of crisis communications and to investigate the level of acceptance by publics against crisis communications interacting with reporting frames. Both content analysis and an experiment were conducted to answer the research questions. According to the results of content analysis, crisis communications were utilized differently by newspapers and varied by reporting frames. Crisis communications were used in order: denial > repair > diminish communications. And newspapers focused on different crisis communications following their reporting ideologies. The experiment showed that research participants accepted repair communications more than diminish and denial communica- tions. The results also confirmed that reporting frames influenced the acceptance level of crisis communications. When thematic frames were used, the acceptance level of crisis communications was higher than any other frames. These results imply that the current level of communication acceptance must be very low because episodic frames are mainly used in reality. Research implications were discussed for raising the effectiveness of crisis communications based on the research results.
참고문헌 (55)
- 강진숙, "재난보도의 현실구성방식 연구: ‘삼풍백화점 붕괴사고’에 관한 TV뉴스 보도를 중심으로", 언론연구, 5(1), pp.117~146 (1996)
- 김영욱, "위기관리의 이해: 공중관계와 위기관리 커뮤니케이션" (2002), 책과 길
- 김영욱, "정치인의 이미지회복 커뮤니케이션 분석: 김영삼 대통령의 IMF사태관련 언변 중심", 광고학연구, 15(5), pp.397~421 (2004)
- 김영욱, "우리나라 조직의 사과 수사학 : 신문에 난 사과광고문의 내용과 수용여부 분석", 광고학연구, 17(1), pp.179~207 (2006), 한국광고학회
- 김영욱, "공격과 방어의 수사학 : 황우석 사건 위기 커뮤니케이션 분석", 한국언론학보, 50(4), pp.5~32 (2006), 한국언론학회
- 김영욱, "위험, 위기, 그리고 커뮤니케이션: 현대 사회위험, 위기, 갈등에 대한 해석과 대응" (2008), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 김영욱, "한국인의 집단주의 성향과 귀인 성향, 그리고 위기 커뮤니케이션 수용 간의 관련성: 국가위기로서의 IMF 상황을 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 48(4), pp.271~298 (2004), 한국언론학회
- 김영욱, "행정기관 이미지 회복 전략의 수사학적 분석:경기도 교육청 입시 재배정 파문을 중심으로", 홍보학연구, 6(2), pp.1~42 (2002), 한국홍보학회
- 박경숙, "집단 갈등 이슈의 방송보도 프레임 분석: 의약분업 뉴스 프레임을 중심으로", 한국 언론학보, 46(2), pp.310~340 (2002)
- 박은혜, "언론 프레이밍과 이미지회복전략이 공중의 위기 인식에 미치는 영향", 한국언론정보학보, 38(여름), pp.73~118 (2007), 한국언론정보학회
- 백진숙, "사과광고의 메시지 유형에 따른 공중의 반응 연구", 한국광고홍보학보, 8(2), pp.184~229 (2006), 한국광고홍보학회
- 이동근, "온라인 뉴스 미디어의 다양성에 관한 일고찰: 정보원 및 프레임 분석을 통하여", 한국언론학보, 48(4), pp.218~242 (2004), 한국언론학회
- 이미현, "신문기사의 쟁점제기방식이 독자의 현실구성에 미치는 영향연구", 석사, pp.2001
- 이상경, "기업 위기 대응 수단으로 선택한 사과가 공중에 수용되는 과정에서 CEO 이미지의 역할에 관한 연구 :삼성과 현대자동차 사회헌납 발표와 수용을 중심으로", 홍보학연구, 10(1), pp.125~161 (2006), 한국홍보학회
- 이준웅, "프레임, 해석 그리고 커뮤니케이션 효과", 언론과 사회, 29, pp.85~142 (2000)
- Allen, M. W., "Legitimation Endeavors: Impression Management Strategies Used by an Organization in Crisis", Communication Monographs, 61, pp.44~62 (1994)
- Allen, M. W., "Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies" (1995), State University of New York Press
- Allen, M. W., "Image restoration discourse and crisis communication in: Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication", pp.263~280 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Brickman, P., "Models of helping and coping", American Psychologist, 37, pp.368~384 (1982)
- Burke, K., "The rhetoric of religion" (1970), University of California Press
- Coombs, W. T., "On-going crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding" (1999), Sage
- Coombs, W. T., "Crisis management: A communicative approach in: Public relations theory II", pp.171~197 (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Coombs, W. T., "Reasoned action in crisis communication: An attribution theory-based approach to crisis management in: Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication", pp.95~115 (2004), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Englehardt, K. J., "Compassion without blame: Testing the accident decision flow chart with the crash of ValuJet flight 592", Journal of public relations research, 16(2), pp.127~156 (2004)
- Entman, M., "Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm", Journal of Communication, 43(3), pp.51~58 (1993)
- Fincham, F. D., "Attribution of responsibility : From man the scientist to man as lawyer in: Advanced in experimental social psychology 13" (1980), Academic Press
- Gamson, W. A., "Talking politics" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Gamson, W. A., "The changing culture of affirmative action in: Research in political sociology 3", pp.137~177 (1987), JAI Press
- Goffman, E., "Presentation of self in everyday life" (1971), Doubleday Anchor Books
- Harrell, J., "Failure of apology in American politics: Nixon on Watergate", Speech Monographs, 42, pp.245~261 (1975)
- Heath, R. L., "Telling a story: A narrative approach to communication during crisis in: Responding to a crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication", pp.167~187 (2004), LEA
- Hearit, K. M., "Corporate apologia: When an organization speaks in defense of itself In Handbook of public relations", pp.595~605 (2000), Sage
- Heisey, D. R., "President Ronald Reagan's apologia on the Iran-Contra affair in: Oratorical encounters: Selected studies and sources of twentieth-century political accusations and apologies", pp.281~306 (1988), Greenwood
- Huxman, S. S., "Exigencies, explanations, and executions: Toward a dynamic theory of the crisis communication genre in: Responding to a crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication", pp.281~297 (2004), LEA
- Iyengar, S., "Television news and citizen's explanations of national affairs", American Political Science Review, 81, pp.815~831 (1987)
- Iyengar, S., "How citizens think about national issues: A matter of responsibility", American Journal of Political Science, 33, pp.878~900 (1989)
- Iyengar, S., "Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues" (1991), University of Chicago Press
- John, M., "Countering Fatalism: Causal Information in New Report Affects Judgment About Earthquake Damage", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(2), pp.109~121 (2001)
- Katula, R., "The apology for Richard M. Nixon", Today's Speech, 23, pp.1~6 (1975)
- Kim, P. H., "When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, pp.49~65 (2006)
- Lazare, A., "On apology" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Millar, F. E., "Metaphors of Crisis", Responding to Crisis, 10, pp.153~166 (2004)
- Mowlana, H., "Triumph of the image: The medias war in the Persian Gulf-A global perspective" (1992), Westview Press
- Ohair, H. D., "The Management of Failure Events:Some Contextual Determinants of Accounting Behavior", Human Communication Research, 9(3), pp.208~224 (1983)
- Price, V., "Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive response", Communication Research, 24(5), pp.481~506 (1997)
- Robbennolt, J. K., "Apologies and legal settlement: An empirical examination", Michigan Law Review, 102, pp.460~485 (2003)
- Ryan, H. R., "Ketegoria and apologia: On their rhetorical criticism as a speech set", Quarterly Journal of Speech, 68, pp.254~261 (1982)
- Scheufele, A., "Framing as a theory of media effects", Journal of Communication, 49(1), pp.103~122 (1999)
- Scott, M. H., "Accounts", American Sociological Review, 33, pp.42~62 (1968)
- Semetko, H. A., "Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news", Journal of Communication, 50(2), pp.93~109 (2000)
- Sturges, D.L., "Communicating through crisis: A strategy for organizational survival", Management Communication Quarterly, 7(3), pp.297~316 (1994)
- Tankard, J. W., "Media frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement", Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communica- tion (1991)
- Tavuchis, N., "Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation" (1991), Stanford University Press
- Ware, B. L., "They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia", Quarterly Journal of speech, 59, pp.273~283 (1973)
- Wilson, G. L., "A strategy of explanation: Richard M. Nixon’s August 8, 1974, resignation address", Communication Quarterly, 24, pp.14~20 (1976)
