진행상표지 ‘-고 있다’의 영어번역 유형과기능문법적 설명
A Functional Account of English Translations of the Korean Progressive Aspect Marker ‘-ko issta’
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study discusses English translations of the Korean progressive aspect marker ‘-ko issta’ in terms of semantics and discourse-pragmatics. It shows that the Korean progressive aspect marker is translated into two types: i) English progressive aspect markers such as be V-ing, have been V-ing or present participle when used as a modifier and ii) English non-progressive markers such as V-ed, have V-en or past participle when used as a modifier or object complement. It also reveals that the two types of translations are determined by the two meanings of ‘-ko issta’, viz. ‘progress’ and ‘resultative continuousness’. ‘-ko issta’ with the ‘progress’ meaning is translated into English progressive aspect markers and one with the resultative continuousness meaning into non-progressive markers. This study also discusses how Ikegami’s (1991) linguistic typology—i.e. DO-language type (English) vs. BECOME-language type (Korean)—plays an important role in deciding foreground information (encoded by means of simple tense) and background information (encoded by means of progressive aspect) in discourse.
Abstract
This study discusses English translations of the Korean progressive aspect marker ‘-ko issta’ in terms of semantics and discourse-pragmatics. It shows that the Korean progressive aspect marker is translated into two types: i) English progressive aspect markers such as be V-ing, have been V-ing or present participle when used as a modifier and ii) English non-progressive markers such as V-ed, have V-en or past participle when used as a modifier or object complement. It also reveals that the two types of translations are determined by the two meanings of ‘-ko issta’, viz. ‘progress’ and ‘resultative continuousness’. ‘-ko issta’ with the ‘progress’ meaning is translated into English progressive aspect markers and one with the resultative continuousness meaning into non-progressive markers. This study also discusses how Ikegami’s (1991) linguistic typology—i.e. DO-language type (English) vs. BECOME-language type (Korean)—plays an important role in deciding foreground information (encoded by means of simple tense) and background information (encoded by means of progressive aspect) in discourse.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김승옥, "서울, 1964년 겨울" (2008), 한림출판사
- 신경숙, "풍금이 있던 자리", pp.11~43 (1993), 문학과 지성사
- Pihl, R., "Seoul-1964-Winter" (2008), Hollym
- "Where the Harmonium Was" (1998)[URL]
- 고영근, "한국어의 시제 서법 동작상" (2004), 태학사
- 김은일, "기능문법과 영어교육", 현대문법연구, (27), pp.105~121 (2002), 현대문법학회
- 김은일, "부호화 체계와 번역" (2010), 한국문화사
- 김은일, "한국어 ‘되다’ 구문의 영어 번역문에 대한 기능문법적 설명", 언어과학, 15(3), pp.61~82 (2008), 한국언어과학회
- 김성화, "국어의 상 연구" (1990), 한신문화사
- 남기심, "표준 국어문법론" (2008), 탑 출판사
- 박덕유, "상의 본질적 의미와 동사 자질에 대한 재 고찰", 국어학, 33, pp.177~212 (1999)
- 심지영, "SEE와 WATCH의 의미와 연어 비교", 새한영어영문학, 50(4), pp.221~240 (2008), 새한영어영문학회
- 이정화, "(인지 문법에서 본) 영어 동사 사전" (2006), 한국문화사
- 이호승, "국어의 상 체계와 보조용언의 상적 의미", 국어학, 38, pp.209~240 (2001)
- 이희자, "한국어 학습용 어미, 조사 사전" (2001), 한국문사
- 한동완, "‘-고 있-’ 구성의 중의성에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 5, pp.215~248 (1999)
- Biber, D., "Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London : Longman" (1999), Longman
- Brown, G., "Discourse Analysis. London : Cambridge University Press" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Comrie, B., "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Givón, T., "English Grammar : A Function-Based Introduction, Vol. Ⅰ & II" (1993), John Benjamins
- Givón, T., "Syntax : An Introduction, Vol. I & II" (2001), John Bejamins
- Grimes, E., "The Thread of Discourse" (1975), Mouton
- Hopper, J., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56(2), pp.251~299 (1980)
- Ikegami, Y, "‘Do-Language’ and ‘Become-Language’: Two Contrasting Types of Linguistic Representation, In The Empire of Sings: Semiotic Essay on Japanese Culture", pp.285~326 (1991), John Benjamins
- Lyons, J., "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Palmer, R, "Lexical Aspect in English", Selected Papers from the 18th ISTAL, 19~33 (2009)
- Quirk, R., "A Grammar of Contemporary English" (1972), Seminar Press
- Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman Group, Ltd
- Vendler, Z., "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press
- Yule. G., "Explaining English Grammar" (1998), Oxford University Press