한국어 ‘되다’ 구문의 영어 번역문에 대한 기능문법적 설명
A Functional Account of English Translations of Korean ‘toyta’ Construction
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to provide a functional account of the English translations of so-called Korean ‘toyta’ passives. Previous studies have shown that ‘toyta’ passives have three different functions: passive, external cause, and non-volitional. Our analysis of the Korean-English parallel corpus shows that ‘toyta’ passives are translated into passives (48.4%) and intransitive/transitive actives (51.6%). It is argued that English does not have a grammatical device to systematically encode ‘semantic defocusing’ such as ‘volitionality defocusing’ and ‘external cause defocusing’ in such a way that Korean ‘toyta’ passives do, and that the two construction types of English translations are functionally motivated by discourse-pragmatic factors such as topicality of participants and discourse markers. This study also shows how human agents are focused in the English translations in terms of Ikegami's (1991) typology
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide a functional account of the English translations of so-called Korean ‘toyta’ passives. Previous studies have shown that ‘toyta’ passives have three different functions: passive, external cause, and non-volitional. Our analysis of the Korean-English parallel corpus shows that ‘toyta’ passives are translated into passives (48.4%) and intransitive/transitive actives (51.6%). It is argued that English does not have a grammatical device to systematically encode ‘semantic defocusing’ such as ‘volitionality defocusing’ and ‘external cause defocusing’ in such a way that Korean ‘toyta’ passives do, and that the two construction types of English translations are functionally motivated by discourse-pragmatic factors such as topicality of participants and discourse markers. This study also shows how human agents are focused in the English translations in terms of Ikegami's (1991) typology
참고문헌 (17)
- 김은일, "수동구문의 기능과 부호화차이: 한영 병렬언어자료의 분석", 현대문법연구, 41, pp.89~110 (2005)
- 김은일, "‘지다’ 구문의 영어번역문에 대한 기능문법적 분석", 언어과, 14(2), pp.23~42 (2007)
- 김은일, "한국어 ‘-게 되다’ 구문의 영어 번역문에 대한 기능문법적 분석", 새한영어영문학, 48(1), pp.159~180 (2006), 새한영어영문학회
- 서정수, "국어문법(수정증보판)" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 이정택, "용언 ‘되다’의 피동법", 한글, 218, pp.139~167 (1992)
- 최현배, "우리말본 (세 번째 고침)" (1961), 정음문화사
- "Collins COBUILD English Dictionary for Advanced Learners (Major New Edition). 2001. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers", ~ (2001)
- Foley, W. A., "Information Packaging in the Clause. In: Language Typology and?Syntactic Description", pp.282~364 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Giv?, T., "Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study (Typological Studies in Language Series 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company", ~ (1983)
- Giv?, T., "English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction, Vol. I & II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company", ~ (1993)
- Giv?, T., "Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. I & II" (2001), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Ikegami, Y., "‘Do-language’ and ‘Become-language’: Two Constrasting Types of Linguistic Representation. In: The Empire of Signs: Semiotic Essays on Japanese Culture", pp.285~326 (1991), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Kim, E., "Voice in Korean" (1992), Hanshin Publishing Co.
- Kosofsky, D., "Common Problems in Korean English" (1991), Foreign Language Ltd.
- Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, "Pearson Education Limited.", ~ (2003)
- Shibatani, M., "Passive and Related Construction: A Prototype Analysis", Language, 61, pp.821~848 (1985)
- Yamamoto, M., "Animacy and Reference: A Cognitive Approach to Corpus Linguistics" (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company