본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

학문목적 한국어학습자의 학술논문에 나타난 자기의견표현담화 분석

The analysis of a text-producer's opinion-expressed discourses in KAP learners' academic theses

0

조회

0

다운로드

24

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

For the last several years, KAP(Korean as an Academic Purpose) learners have been enormously extended. As KAP learners' needs have been highly arising, the significance of efficient KAP curriculum is emphasized. Especially, writing of an academic thesis has been commonly pointed out as one of the most difficult academic tasks in KAP curriculum by KAP learners because of its difficult academic literacy. It is high time for learner-oriented directions for writing of an academic thesis to be suggested in KAP. The purpose of this study is to examine a text producer's opinion-expressed discourses(OED) appeared in KAP learners' theses and to find its characteristics according to the degree of performative strength, so to suggest effective educational directions in writing an academic thesis in KAP. The reasons why this study would concentrate on OED are summarized as followings. Firstly, OED is fundamentally related to the purpose of text production, which is to insist an text-producer's academic opinion and to persuade text-receivers to accept it. Secondly, unlike unmarked descriptive discourses regarding general facts, OED in the academic thesis is generally presented with various marked expressions accompanying academic literacy, which are to be trained. Finally, effective learner-oriented education can be possible when it is suggested based upon analysis of learners' language itself. For the sake of this analysis, OED in KAP learners' theses are collected and are divided into strong expressions and weak expressions by the degree of performative strength. Outstanding characteristics of each OED also are examined. Furthermore, these characteristics are compared with those of Korean text producers. On the basis of this comparison, educational directions in writing an academic thesis for KAP learners are suggested.

Abstract

For the last several years, KAP(Korean as an Academic Purpose) learners have been enormously extended. As KAP learners' needs have been highly arising, the significance of efficient KAP curriculum is emphasized. Especially, writing of an academic thesis has been commonly pointed out as one of the most difficult academic tasks in KAP curriculum by KAP learners because of its difficult academic literacy. It is high time for learner-oriented directions for writing of an academic thesis to be suggested in KAP. The purpose of this study is to examine a text producer's opinion-expressed discourses(OED) appeared in KAP learners' theses and to find its characteristics according to the degree of performative strength, so to suggest effective educational directions in writing an academic thesis in KAP. The reasons why this study would concentrate on OED are summarized as followings. Firstly, OED is fundamentally related to the purpose of text production, which is to insist an text-producer's academic opinion and to persuade text-receivers to accept it. Secondly, unlike unmarked descriptive discourses regarding general facts, OED in the academic thesis is generally presented with various marked expressions accompanying academic literacy, which are to be trained. Finally, effective learner-oriented education can be possible when it is suggested based upon analysis of learners' language itself. For the sake of this analysis, OED in KAP learners' theses are collected and are divided into strong expressions and weak expressions by the degree of performative strength. Outstanding characteristics of each OED also are examined. Furthermore, these characteristics are compared with those of Korean text producers. On the basis of this comparison, educational directions in writing an academic thesis for KAP learners are suggested.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 강범모, "한국어의 텍스트 장르와 언어특성" (2002), 고려대학교 출판부
  2. 남기심, "표준 국어문법론" (1993), 탑출판사
  3. 박영순, "한국어 담화·텍스트론" (2004), 한국문화사
  4. 박재연, "한국어 양태표현 연구" (2006), 태학사
  5. 손남익, "국어부사연구" (1995), 박이정
  6. 안주호, "한국어교육과 양태표현" (2012), 한국문화사
  7. 엄녀, "한국어 양태표현과 교육연구" (2010), 한국문화사
  8. 이미혜, "한국어 문법항목 교육연구" (2005), 박이정
  9. 조성남, "질적연구방법과 실제" (2011), 도서출판 그림
  10. 권성미, "연결어미의 종결어미적 쓰임에 나타나는 억양의 중간언어 연구", 한국어교육, 21(4), pp.1~23 (2010), 국제한국어교육학회
  11. 김영미, "학문 목적 한국어 쓰기 교육 -장르 기반 접근법으로-", 한국어교육, 21(1), pp.87~123 (2010), 국제한국어교육학회
  12. 김지혜, "담화 분석을 통한 한국어 간접 인용 표현 교육 방안 연구", 이중언어학, (46), pp.45~65 (2011), 이중언어학회
  13. 박나리, "학술논문의 텍스트성 분석 - 의도성(intentionality)을 중심으로 -", 텍스트언어학, 25(0), pp.163~192 (2008), 한국텍스트언어학회
  14. 박나리, "‘-는 것이다’ 구문 연구 -문법기능과 담화기능 그리고 화자의 담화전략의 상관성을 중심으로-", 國語學, (65), pp.251~279 (2012), 국어학회
  15. 박성철, "학술언어의 이상적 문체에 대한 비판적 일고찰", 텍스트언어학, 31, pp.67~102 (2011), 한국텍스트언어학회
  16. 백설자, "학술논증과 조건구문", 텍스트언어학, 3, pp.375~401 (1994), 한국텍스트언어학회
  17. 신명선, "국어 학술텍스트에 드러난 헤지(Hedge) 표현에 대한 연구", 배달말, (38), pp.151~180 (2006), 배달말학회
  18. 신명선, "학문 목적의 한국어 학습자를 위한 어휘 교육의 내용 연구", 한국어교육, 17(1), pp.237~264 (2006), 국제한국어교육학회
  19. 신선경, "‘것이다’ 구문에 관하여", 국어학, 23, pp.119~158 (1993), 국어학회
  20. 오선경, "학문 목적의 한국어 듣기 교육을 위한 강의 담화 분석", 한국어교육, 18(2), pp.199~220 (2007), 국제한국어교육학회
  21. 이덕희, "요구 분석을 통한 학문 목적의 한국어 교육과정 설계 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2004
  22. 이미혜, "한국어 문법 교육에서 ‘표현항목’ 설정에 대한 연구", 한국어교육, 13(2), pp.10~226 (2002), 국제한국어교육학회
  23. 이승연, "고급 한국어 학습자를 위한 수사의문문 교육 연구 -논증적 글쓰기의 문어체 수사의문문을 중심으로-", 한국어교육, 23(3), pp.259~287 (2012), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
  24. 이윤진, "한국어교육에서의 양태 표현 연구", 한국어교육, 14(1), pp.8~210 (2003), 국제한국어교육학회
  25. 이은경, "사고발화법을 이용한 한국어 요약문 쓰기 전략 분석 -한국인과 중국인 대학생의 비교를 중심으로-", 한국어교육, 23(3), pp.315~342 (2012), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
  26. 이준호, "학술 텍스트에 나타난 한국어 헤지 표현 선정 연구", 이중언어학, (49), pp.269~297 (2012), 이중언어학회[DOI]
  27. 이지양, "융합형 ‘-래도’에 대하여", 관악어문연구, 10, pp.309~331 (1985), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
  28. 이필영, "서술부 양태 표현들의 범주화와 결합양상", 담화와 인지, 11(3), pp.131~152 (2004), 담화·인지언어학회
  29. 임홍빈, "‘-겠-’과 대상성, In 국어문법의 심층 1-문장범주와 굴절" (1998), 태학사
  30. 홍윤기, "한국어 학습자의 조사 선택 연구", 한국어교육, 21(4), pp.393~424 (2010), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
  31. 泉子, "담화분석과 일본어 교육" (2006), 제이콤씨
  32. Brown, P, "Politeness: Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  33. Heinemann, W, "텍스트언어학 입문" (2001), 역락
  34. Hyland, K., "Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles", Applied Linguistics, 17(4), pp.433~454 (1996)
  35. Kramsch. C, "Discourse Analysis and Second Language Teaching" (1981), ERIC
  36. Lakoff, G, "Hedges: A study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fussy Concepts", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, pp.458~508 (1972)
  37. Lyons, J, "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
  38. Nation, I.S.P, "Learning Vocabulary in Another Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)