교통사고 유발 범칙행위의 벌점 및 범칙금 분류 연구
A study on the categorizing license penalty score and fine about the items causing traffic accidents
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to categorize penalty scores and fine based on a heavy dangerousness rate of traffic accidents. 137,995 traffic accidents data, with only one passenger in the vehicle, caused by 11 violation items during 2005-2009 were collected. They can be categorized to 3 penalty score groups and 5 fine groups followed in as current penalty rules through the K-Means cluster analysis method. The results were as follows. First, in penalty scores, 11violation items are categorized to 3 groups. Analysing result reveals that some items should be reclassified. Including signal violation, 7 items were up graded and using cell phone while driving was down graded. In fine, including the passing the center line, 6 items were up graded, and using cell phone while driving was down graded. Second, F test was conducted about the penalty score groups and fine groups respectively, there were significant differences between each groups. Third, a result of Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that there is very high correlations between penalty score groups and fine groups. As a whole, including the over speed(20-40km/h), 5 items were under estimated in the view of dangerousness, and using cell phones while driving is overestimated, so they should be assigned rationally than those of current. This study is expected to be a basic material to establish and to operate the traffic penalty score and fine policies.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to categorize penalty scores and fine based on a heavy dangerousness rate of traffic accidents. 137,995 traffic accidents data, with only one passenger in the vehicle, caused by 11 violation items during 2005-2009 were collected. They can be categorized to 3 penalty score groups and 5 fine groups followed in as current penalty rules through the K-Means cluster analysis method. The results were as follows. First, in penalty scores, 11violation items are categorized to 3 groups. Analysing result reveals that some items should be reclassified. Including signal violation, 7 items were up graded and using cell phone while driving was down graded. In fine, including the passing the center line, 6 items were up graded, and using cell phone while driving was down graded. Second, F test was conducted about the penalty score groups and fine groups respectively, there were significant differences between each groups. Third, a result of Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that there is very high correlations between penalty score groups and fine groups. As a whole, including the over speed(20-40km/h), 5 items were under estimated in the view of dangerousness, and using cell phones while driving is overestimated, so they should be assigned rationally than those of current. This study is expected to be a basic material to establish and to operate the traffic penalty score and fine policies.
참고문헌 (18)
- 경찰대학, "경찰교통론" (2009), 경찰교통론
- 경찰청, "도로교통안전전백서" (2006), 경찰청
- 경찰청, "도로교통 관련법령의 변천사" (2003), 경찰청
- 경찰청, "운전면허 행정처분 기준 개선 연구", 경찰청, ~ (2006)
- 도로교통안전협회, "운전면허 벌점제도에 관한 연구", 도로교통안전협회, ~ (1996)
- 고준우, "운전면허 벌점제도에 대한 연구", 도로교통공단, ~ (1996)
- 김남철, "교통법규위반행위의 유형 및 제재수단의 법적 문제- 한국과 독일의 도로교통법령의 비교를 중심으로", 토지공법연구, 35, pp.409~435 (2007), 한국토지공법학회
- 김만배, "위법운전자 제재수단의 효율성 확보방안 연구", 도로교통공단, ~ (2006)
- 김원중, "교통법규위반에 대한 효과적 제재방안 연구", 경찰청, ~ (2008)
- 명묘희, "운전면허행정처분의 교통안전효과 평가", 교통안전연구논집, 25 (2006), 도로교통공단
- 명묘희, "위법운전자에 대한 제재 수준과 정책수단 선택의 교통안전효과 비교", 대한교통학회지, 26(1), pp.89~100 (2008), 대한교통학회
- 박영국, "운전면허 행정처분제도 운영방안 연구", 교통안전연구논집, 19 (2000), 도로교통공단
- 삼성교통안전문화연구소, "교통 범칙금 및 과태료 수준에 관한 연구", 삼성교통안전문화연구소, ~ (2004)
- 이태경, "교통", 사망 사고 발생건수와 빈도에 의한 범칙금 부과방안, 1988, pp.16(4), ~
- 정광정, "운전면허행정처분 기준의 법적 성질에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (26), pp.47~68 (2007), 한국법학회
- 장영채, "운전면허 행정처분제도 개선방안 연구", 도로교통공단, ~ (1999)
- 정철우, "교통사고 유발 범칙행위의 범칙금 분류 연구", 경찰학연구, 10(1), pp.257~276 (2010), 경찰대학
- Rune Elvik, "The Handbook of Road Safety Measures" (2004), Elsevier Ltd
