성과평가의 효과성에 관한 한·중간 비교연구
A Comparative Study of Effectiveness of Performance Evaluation between South Korea and China
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the enactment of GPRA of 1993 in the U.S., performance measurement initiative has been a symbol of government innovation among many nations around the world. Then, how much do public employees accept the initiative as their effective management tool? Which factors do affect public employees’ degree of acceptance? Ultimately, this study tries to find a clue within the big research question which is the nature of performance management or evaluation in the public sector: is it a technical gimmick or political strategy of effective management for the public sector? This study is a comparative study of performance-based pay for school teachers between South Kore and China. It conducts a self-administered questionnaire research to ask how much teachers accept the policy as an effective management policy in South Kore and China. Utilizing a regression analysis, this study tries to find factors affecting the degree of acceptance. Independent variables are individual factors, policy factors, environmental factors, and socio-cultural factors. As the result of the statistical analysis, it is observed that the policy and socio-cultural factors strongly affect the degree of acceptance in both countries. The policy factors consist of relevance of evaluation indicators, evaluation process, support policy(e.g. education and technical support), and incentives. In particular, the socio-cultural factors is observed as the crucial factor affecting the degree of acceptance which means an important aspect of performance management & evaluation in the public sector could be a political strategy for effective and democratic government management. Further theoretical and policy implication are discussed.
Abstract
Since the enactment of GPRA of 1993 in the U.S., performance measurement initiative has been a symbol of government innovation among many nations around the world. Then, how much do public employees accept the initiative as their effective management tool? Which factors do affect public employees’ degree of acceptance? Ultimately, this study tries to find a clue within the big research question which is the nature of performance management or evaluation in the public sector: is it a technical gimmick or political strategy of effective management for the public sector? This study is a comparative study of performance-based pay for school teachers between South Kore and China. It conducts a self-administered questionnaire research to ask how much teachers accept the policy as an effective management policy in South Kore and China. Utilizing a regression analysis, this study tries to find factors affecting the degree of acceptance. Independent variables are individual factors, policy factors, environmental factors, and socio-cultural factors. As the result of the statistical analysis, it is observed that the policy and socio-cultural factors strongly affect the degree of acceptance in both countries. The policy factors consist of relevance of evaluation indicators, evaluation process, support policy(e.g. education and technical support), and incentives. In particular, the socio-cultural factors is observed as the crucial factor affecting the degree of acceptance which means an important aspect of performance management & evaluation in the public sector could be a political strategy for effective and democratic government management. Further theoretical and policy implication are discussed.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강황선, "지방정부 성과의 상대적 능률성 측정에 관한 연구 - 서울시 25개 자치구의 민원행정업무를 중심으로 -", 한국행정논집, 21(3), pp.999~1024 (2009), 한국정부학회
- 국경복, "관리제도의 수용성과 효과성 인식에 관한 경험적 연구: 사례를 중심으로", 정책분석평가학회보, 17(3), pp.31~53 (2007), 한국정책분석평가학회
- 김이경, "한국의 교원성과상여금제와 중국의 교사적효공자제(敎師绩效工资制) 비교 분석", 비교교육연구, 23(3), pp.51~76 (2013), 한국비교교육학회
- 김주환, "우리나라 자체평가시스템의 내실화 방안에 관한 연구", 한국정책과학학회보, 10(1), pp.171~196 (2006), 한국정책과학학회
- 금재덕, "성과관리체계의 부정적 효과에 관한 실증연구: 중앙정부 각 부처 공무원의 인식도를 중심으로", 한국사회와 행정연구, 20(2), pp.347~377 (2009), 서울행정학회
- 김한창, "성과관리수용성 제고요인에 관한 연구: 노무현 정부의 중앙부처를 중심으로", 정부학연구, 14(2), pp.5~48 (2008), 정부학연구소
- 남창우, "공공부문의 BSC수용성 및 조직성과의 영향요인 분석: 조직구성원의 인식을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 42(3), pp.165~190 (2008), 한국행정학회
- 박남희, "과학시대의 이성" (2009), 책세상
- 배상석, "정부회계도입의 정책확산(Policy Diffusion)에 대한 실증적 분석: 영남지역 광역 및 기초자치단체를 중심으로", 한국정책학회보, 16(3), pp.231~254 (2007), 한국정책학회
- 王多多, "중국 교원성과상여금 정책의 정책수용도의 결정요인에 관한 연구", 석사, 행정학과, pp.2012
- 유금록, "공공부문의 효율성과 영향요인 분석: 도시개발공사를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 42(3), pp.79~109 (2008), 한국행정학회
- 이석환, "성과평가제도의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구: 평가체계요인과 내부동기요인을 중심으로", 한국사회와 행정연구, 20(4), pp.269~291 (2010), 서울행정학회
- 이쌍철, "교원성과급 정책집행의 순응 및 불응 요인 분석", 교육행정학연구, 26(4), pp.217~240 (2008), 한국교육행정학회
- 이환범, "기초자치단체 행정역량 강화를 위한 성과관리시스템 개발 및 보완 - 조직문화 유형별 조직 성과평가 비교분석을 중심으로 -", 한국행정논집, 20(1), pp.131~153 (2008), 한국정부학회
- 장석준, "정책유형별 확산 메커니즘의 차별적 영향력에 관한 실증 연구", 한국정책학회보, 22(4), pp.253~284 (2013), 한국정책학회
- "교원성과급? 연공서열순… 젊은 교사들 기대도 안해", 동아일보, ~ (2012)
- Dong, F. W., "Compulsory Education School Faculty Performance Salary Policy", Modern Education, 2, pp.2~4 (2011)
- Government Accountability Office(GAO), "Program Evaluation: An Evaluation Culture and Collaborative Partnerships Help Build Agency Capacity", GAO-03-454, ~ (2003)
- Gordillo, G., "From Policy Lessons to Policy Actions : Motivation to Take Evaluation Seriously", Public Administration and Development, 24(4), pp.305~320 (2004)
- "The Use and the Effects of Using Performance Measures for Budgeting, Management, and Reporting" (2001)[URL]
- Harvey, David., "The Limits to Capital" (1982), Basil Blackwell Publisher
- Hatry, H. P., "Performance Measurement: Getting Results" (1999), The Urban Institute Press
- Julnes, P., "Promoting the Utilization of Performance Measures in Public Organizations : An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting Adoption and Implementation", Public Administration Review, 61(4), pp.693~708 (2001)
- 강황선, "Holistic Understanding Performance Measurement Initiative of South Korea - Hidden Bureaucratic Politics and Its Wakes -", 한국비교정부학보, 15(2), pp.1~28 (2011), 한국비교정부학회
- Levy, P. E., "The Social Context of Performance Appraisal : A Review and Framework for the Future", Journal of Management, 30(6), pp.881~905 (2004)
- Morley, Elaine, "Comparative Performance Measurement" (2001), The Urban Institute Press
- Moynihan, D. P., "The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform" (2008), Georgetown University Press
- Murphy, K. R., "Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives" (1995), Sage
- Parker, Christopher P., "Relationship between Psychological Climate Perceptions and Work Outcomes : a Meta-Analytic Review", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(4), pp.389~416 (2003)
- Smits, P., "An Assessment of the Theoretical Underpinning of Practical Participatory Evaluation", American Journal of Evaluation, 29(4), pp.427~442 (2008)
- Stubblenine, Patrick C., "Perception and Acceptance of Evaluations by Supervisors and Peers", Current Psychology, 20(1), pp.85~94 (2001)
- Taylor, Jeannette., "Factors Influencing the Use of Performance Information for Decision Making in Australian State Agencies", Public Administration, 89(4), pp.1316~1334 (2011)
- Thanassoulis, E., "The Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in the Regulation of UK Water Utilities : Water Distribution", European Journal of Operational Research, 126(2), pp.436~453 (2000)
- Wang, X., "Public Officials' Attitudes toward Subjective Performance Measures", Public Productivity & Management Review, 22(4), pp.537~553 (1999)
- Wei, L. X., "On Compulsory Education Reform and Teacher Merit Pay", Journal of Naming University of Science and Technology, 23, pp.30~41 (2010)