본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

문항반응이론을 적용한 한국형 재구조화연합검사(K-RAT)의 문항탐색

An Item Detection of the Korean-Restructuring Association Test(K-RAT) Applying Item Response Theory

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

이 연구는 문항반응이론을 적용하여 한국형 재구조화연합검사(K-RAT: Korean- Restructuring Association Test)의 문항 양호도를 확인하는데 목적이 있다. 서울과 경기도, 충남에 거주하는 대학생 512명을 대상으로 총 48개 문항으로 구성된 K-RAT의 반응을 조사하였다. 문항반응이론에 근거한 K-RAT 문항의 난이도, 변별도, 문항적합도, 문항정보함수를 산출한 결과, 높은 난이도(M=0.627)와 높은 변별도(M=1.706) 그리고 2-모수 로지스틱 모형에 적합한 39문항의 최종 문항이 선정되었다. 검사 정보함수 그래프를 산출해 본 결과, 능력수준이 중간 수준(-1, 0, 1)에 있는 피험자들을 측정하는데 신뢰로운 검사로 확인되었다. 이러한 결과는 K-RAT가 통찰기제의 개념적 표상변환의 재구조화를 측정하는 창의적 문제해결의 문제발견 검사로 타당하게 활용될 수 있다는 것을 시사한다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analysis items of the Korean-Restructuring Association Test(K-RAT) using response theory. The subjects were sampled from 512 students from college. An average index of item difficulty(M=0.627) and item discrimination(M=1.706) was high. And test of goodness-of-fit was revealed that 39 items of K-RAT were fit to 2-parameter logistic model. Item information function was revealed that item of K-RAT had maxim information at moderate level of ability. Therefore items of K-RAT was at moderate level of ability. Based on the results, following conclusion can be drawn. The K-RAT is a reliable and validate restructuring associative test which measures insightful thinking with restructuring of conceptual representation change. K-RAT provides a differentiated measurement method from other problem finding measurement method which requires only divergent thinking. That is, restructuring require convergent logical analysis to help determine the inadequacy of the initial formulation and to verify or falsify new formulations as they are generated. Once a flawed formulation has been abandoned, restructuring should require divergent thinking to discover the elements and structure of new formulations. Thus, K-RAT can be considered as a valid predictor for convergent thinking and divergent thinking.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 강태훈, "교육 및 심리검사의 구인 타당도 검증을 위한완전-정보 문항 요인분석의 적용", 교육평가연구, 20(2), pp.173~197 (2007), 한국교육평가학회
  2. 한기순, "과학영재의 과학문제발견력 관련변인에 대한 구조방정식모형 분석: 과학관련태도와 동기 및 자기조절 학습전략을 중심으로", 영재교육연구, 18(1), pp.23~52 (2008), 한국영재학회
  3. 성태제, "문항반응이론의 이해와 적용" (2005), 서울과학사
  4. 성태제, "교육평가의 기초" (2009), 학지사
  5. 윤경미, "영재판별의 새로운 변인: 문제발견력", 교육심리연구, 20(3), pp.587~604 (2006), 한국교육심리학회
  6. 이순묵, "요인분석의 기초" (2000), 서울과학사
  7. 한윤영, "통찰문제의 재구조화를 활용한 문제발견 검사로서의 K-RAT(Korean-Restructuring Test) 개발 및 타당화", 교육심리연구, 26(4), pp.1023~1051 (2012), 한국교육심리학회
  8. Anastasi, A., "Psychological testing" (1982)
  9. Ansburg, P. I., "Individual differences in problem solving via insight", Current Psychology, 19(2), pp.143~146 (2000)
  10. Ansburg, P. I., "Promoting insightful problem solving", Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(1), pp.30~60 (2000)
  11. Baba, Y., "An analysis of creativity by means of the remote associates test for adults revised in Japanese (Jarat Form-A)", Japanese Journal of Psychology, 52, pp.330~336 (1982)
  12. Baker, F. B., "The basics of item response theory" (1985), Heinemann
  13. 성태제, "문항반응이론입문" (1991), 양서원
  14. Beeman, M. J., "The right hemisphere maintains solutionrelated activation for yet-to-be-solved problems", Memory & Cognition, 28(7), pp.1231~1241 (2000)
  15. Bowden, E. M., "Aha! Insight experience correlates with solutions activation in the right hemisphere", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), pp.730~737 (2003)
  16. Bowers, K. S., "Intuition in the context of discovery", Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), pp.72~110 (1990)
  17. Bunge, M., "Scientific Research I : The search for system" (1967), Springer-Verlag
  18. In Subotnik, R. F., "Factors from the structure of intellect model associated with gifted adolescent' problem finding in science: Research with Westinghouse Science Talent Search winners", Journal of Creative Behavior, 22, pp.42~54 (1988)
  19. Chermahini, S. A., "Development and validity of a Dutch version of the Remote Associates Task: An item-response theory approach", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, pp.177~186 (2012)
  20. Cunningham, J. B., "Categories of insight and their correlates: An exploration of relationships among classic-type insight problems, rebus puzzles, remote associates and esoteric analogies", Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, pp.1~22 (2009)
  21. Dallob, P., "Erroneous solutions to verbal insight problems: Effects of highlighting critical material", In Paper presented at the Meeting of the Western Psychological Association (1993)
  22. David, P. D., "An analysis and evaluation of the internal validity if the remote associate test: What does it measure?", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, pp.1031~1040 (1978)
  23. Dorfman, J., "Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving, In Implicit cognition", pp.257~296 (1996), The Oxford University Press
  24. Estrada, C. A., "Positive affect improves creative problem solving and influences reported source of practice satisfaction in physicians", Motivation and Emotion, 18, pp.285~299 (1994)
  25. Fodor, E. M., "Subclinical inclination toward manic-depression and creative performance on the Remote Associates Test", Personality and individual differences, 27(6), pp.1273~1283 (1999)
  26. Getzel, J. W., "The problem of the problem, In New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Question framing and response consistency" (1983), Jossey-Bass
  27. Gick, M. L., "Cognitive and affective components of insight, In The Nature of insight", pp.197~228 (1995), MIT Press
  28. Guilford, J. P., "The nature of human intelligence" (1967), McGraw-Hill
  29. Hambleton, R., "Reliability of credentialing examinations and the impact of scoring models and standard-setting policies", Applied Measurement in Education, 10(1), pp.19~38 (1997)
  30. Hamilton, M. A., "Jamaicanizing the Mednick Remote Associates Test of creativity", Perceptual & Motor Skills, 55, pp.321~322 (1982)
  31. Jay, E. S., "The nature of problem finding in students' scientific inquiry", 박사, pp.1996
  32. MacGregor, J. N., "Information-processing and insight: Aprocess model of performance on the nine-dot andrelated problems", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), pp.176~201 (2001)
  33. Mednick, S., "The associative basis of the creative process", Psychological Review, 69(3), pp.220~232 (1962)
  34. Mikulincer, M., "Adult attachment style and cognitive reactions to positive affect: A test of mental categorization and creative problem solving", Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), pp.149~174 (2000)
  35. Schooler, J. W., "The ineffability of insight, In The creative cognition approach", pp.249~268 (1995), The MIT Press
  36. Smith, S. M., "Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving", American Journal of Psychology, 104, pp.61~87 (1991)
  37. Weisberg, R. W., "Prolegomena to theories of insight problem solving: A taxonomy of problems, In The nature of insight", pp.157~196 (1995), MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)