김억의 번역 한시에 나타난 미의식 연구
The Study of Aesthetic Consciousness shown in Kim Eok′s Chiness Poetry in Translation
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is designed to understand Kim Eok's translation viewpoint based on his Korean version of the anthology of Chinese poems and look into his aesthetic consciousness about Korean modern poetry by giving careful consideration to the traits shown in his real translation on the basis of this understanding. I ultimately studied Kim Eok's aesthetic consciousness shown in his Korean version of Chinese poems by considering the characteristics and rhythmic aspects in the process of his translation of the titles and contents of Chinese poems. This is the significant matter that can explain the influence between his translation of Chinese poetry and Korean modern poetry and ultimately scrutinize the aesthetic source of Korean modern poetry. The following is the result of careful consideration of Kim Eok's aesthetic consciousness shown in his Korean version of Chinese poems. First, the reason he translated Chines poems can be found in his viewpoint of Korean literature. He defines Korean literature as what 'Koreans' reveals 'Korean sentiment' in 'the Korean language.' Moreover, his translation viewpoint can be said "Translation is creation." This is Kim Eok's unique point of view that he understands translation not as the matter of language but as the matter of emotion. From this point of view, he translation reaches the level of recreation of texts by choosing not literal translation but liberal translation. In this study I comprehended it as the situation -oriented translation. The second point is the aspect of translation language. Kim Eok tries to find the aesthetic consciousness of the Korean language through the Korean translation of Chinese poems. As a result of reviewing the process of translating the titles of poems, I could find the cases of translating the original title of a poem literally, using the material of a poem or giving a new title. His titles of poems formed the complementary cooperation with the contents and built up new aesthetic consciousness of poetry in translation. The third aspect is rules of versification. He suggested fixed rules of versification even considering organization of vowels and consonants, repetition of lines and verses, standardization of the number of syllables and timing of pronunciation as the ways of ensuring rhythmic sense of Korean poetry. Among these, what Kim Eok noted is standardization of the number of syllables. It can be confirmed in that the basic rules of versification of the Chinese poems he translated are made up of 3 feet and 7·5 meters. In addition, he felt sorry that there is no rhyme in Korean modern poetry. Thus he tried to realize it in the process of translation of Chinese poems. Therefore, he tries doing liberal translation actively to ensure rhyme in spite of the change of amount of information that the original poem contains. We could judge this rhyme as the unique aesthetic consciousness appearing in Chinese poems in Korean translation.
Abstract
This study is designed to understand Kim Eok's translation viewpoint based on his Korean version of the anthology of Chinese poems and look into his aesthetic consciousness about Korean modern poetry by giving careful consideration to the traits shown in his real translation on the basis of this understanding. I ultimately studied Kim Eok's aesthetic consciousness shown in his Korean version of Chinese poems by considering the characteristics and rhythmic aspects in the process of his translation of the titles and contents of Chinese poems. This is the significant matter that can explain the influence between his translation of Chinese poetry and Korean modern poetry and ultimately scrutinize the aesthetic source of Korean modern poetry. The following is the result of careful consideration of Kim Eok's aesthetic consciousness shown in his Korean version of Chinese poems. First, the reason he translated Chines poems can be found in his viewpoint of Korean literature. He defines Korean literature as what 'Koreans' reveals 'Korean sentiment' in 'the Korean language.' Moreover, his translation viewpoint can be said "Translation is creation." This is Kim Eok's unique point of view that he understands translation not as the matter of language but as the matter of emotion. From this point of view, he translation reaches the level of recreation of texts by choosing not literal translation but liberal translation. In this study I comprehended it as the situation -oriented translation. The second point is the aspect of translation language. Kim Eok tries to find the aesthetic consciousness of the Korean language through the Korean translation of Chinese poems. As a result of reviewing the process of translating the titles of poems, I could find the cases of translating the original title of a poem literally, using the material of a poem or giving a new title. His titles of poems formed the complementary cooperation with the contents and built up new aesthetic consciousness of poetry in translation. The third aspect is rules of versification. He suggested fixed rules of versification even considering organization of vowels and consonants, repetition of lines and verses, standardization of the number of syllables and timing of pronunciation as the ways of ensuring rhythmic sense of Korean poetry. Among these, what Kim Eok noted is standardization of the number of syllables. It can be confirmed in that the basic rules of versification of the Chinese poems he translated are made up of 3 feet and 7·5 meters. In addition, he felt sorry that there is no rhyme in Korean modern poetry. Thus he tried to realize it in the process of translation of Chinese poems. Therefore, he tries doing liberal translation actively to ensure rhyme in spite of the change of amount of information that the original poem contains. We could judge this rhyme as the unique aesthetic consciousness appearing in Chinese poems in Korean translation.
참고문헌 (14)
- 홍순석, "김억 한시역선" (1988), 한국문화사
- 김욱동, "근대의 세 번역가" (2010), 소명출판
- 더글러스 로빈슨, "번역과 제국" (2002), 동문선
- 박경수, "안서김억전서 5" (1987), 한국문화사
- 이향, "번역이란 무엇인가" (2008), 살림
- 허경진, "매창 시집" (2007), 평민사
- 허미자, "조선조 여류시문전집" (1988), 태학사
- 김준희, "김억의 번역이 한국의 근대시에 미친 영향", 석사, pp.2007
- 노춘기, "안서와 소월의 한시 번역과 창작시의 율격", 한국시학연구, (13), pp.277~306 (2005), 한국시학회
- 서진영, "한국 근대시에 나타난 ‘격조론(格調論)’의 의미 연구 - 김억과 이병기를 중심으로", 한국현대문학연구, (29), pp.289~318 (2009), 한국현대문학회
- 손종호, "소월의 번역한시와 시의식", 한국시학연구, 8, pp.5~ (2003), 한국시학회
- 沈善玉, "근대시 형성과 번역의 상관성―金億을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (62), pp.321~351 (2008), 대동문화연구원
- 이규호, "안서의 한시번역과정", 국어국문학, 86, pp.193~213 (1981), 국어국문학회
- 한경희, "김억의 근대문예 인식 연구", 어문학, (101), pp.423~450 (2008), 한국어문학회
