5-6세 한국 아동의 보조사 ‘도’와 ‘만’의 이해 능력
Korean Children's Comprehension of Two Postpositional Particles - ‘do’ and ‘man’
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current study investigated 5- to 6-year-old Korean children’s comprehension of two postpositional particles, do ʻalsoʼ and man ʻonlyʼ, using a picture-pointing task. In Experiment 1 in which there was no context sentence prior to test sentences, the children correctly understood the meaning of sentences including ‘man’, whereas they had difficulties in understanding sentences including ‘do’. However, in Experiment 2 in which the test sentences were preceeded by a context sentence describing a character in the pictures, the children correctly understood sentences including ‘do’ as well as sentences including ‘man.’ These results suggest that at least by 5 years of age, Korean children acquire the meaning of postpositional particles ‘man’ and ‘do.’ When a proper contextual information is provided, 5- to 6-year-old children who were reported that they could not understand the meaning of ‘do’ in the earlier research can comprehend the meaning of ‘do’ and ‘man’.
Abstract
The current study investigated 5- to 6-year-old Korean children’s comprehension of two postpositional particles, do ʻalsoʼ and man ʻonlyʼ, using a picture-pointing task. In Experiment 1 in which there was no context sentence prior to test sentences, the children correctly understood the meaning of sentences including ‘man’, whereas they had difficulties in understanding sentences including ‘do’. However, in Experiment 2 in which the test sentences were preceeded by a context sentence describing a character in the pictures, the children correctly understood sentences including ‘do’ as well as sentences including ‘man.’ These results suggest that at least by 5 years of age, Korean children acquire the meaning of postpositional particles ‘man’ and ‘do.’ When a proper contextual information is provided, 5- to 6-year-old children who were reported that they could not understand the meaning of ‘do’ in the earlier research can comprehend the meaning of ‘do’ and ‘man’.
참고문헌 (33)
- 권도하, "2-5세 아동의 조사 발달 연구", 언어치료연구, 9, pp.139~164 (2000)
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1999), 탑출판사
- 박기덕, "한국어 보조사 사용의 전제", 언어와 언어학, 26, pp.119~135 (2001)
- 배소영, "한국아동의 문법형태소 습득 연구: 조사 “가, 이, 는, 도, 를", 말-언어장애연구, 2, pp.27~42 (1997)
- 변윤희, "문맥적 단서와 은유의 종류에 따른 아동의 은유 이해의 발달", 인간발달연구, 7(1), pp.49~62 (2000)
- 이관규, "조사의 통사론적 연구: 국어의 격과 조사" (1999), 월인
- 이순형, "한국 아동의 언어 획득에 관한 연구 Ⅱ", 덕성여대논문집, 12, pp.187~188 (1983)
- 이승희, "3-6세 한국 아동의 보조사 발달에 관한 연구: 은", 는, 만, 도, 2002, pp.7(2), 24~45[DOI]
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1998), 학연사
- 이인섭, "유아어휘", 서울여대논문집, 5, pp.17~45 (1976)
- 이인섭, "아동의 언어발달: 한국 아동의 단계적 위상" (1986), 개문사
- 이희란, "부모보고를 통해 종단관찰한 한국 아동의 초기 문법형태소 습득", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 13(2), pp.159~173 (2008), 한국언어청각임상학회
- 정연창, "조사 사용에 대한 재고", 언어과학, 6(1), pp.127~148 (1999)
- 정연창, "조사와 접속어에 대한 담화인지적 분석", 언어과학, 13(2), pp.33~53 (2006), 한국언어과학회
- 정연창, "담화기능적 개념에 대한 연구", 언어과학, 5(2), pp.459~487 (1998)
- 조명한, "한국 아동의 언어획득 연구: 책략모형" (1982), 서울대학교 출판부
- 최웅환, "조사의 기능과 배합", 언어과학연구, 1(29), pp.289~312 (2004), 언어과학회
- 황미향, "조사 ‘-도’의 택스트 형성 기능 연구", 언어과학연구, 21, pp.223~236 (2002)
- Boersma, P, "Praat, a System for Doing Phonetics by Computer", Glot International, 5(9-10), pp.341~345 (2001)
- Clark, E. V., "Learning to Coin Agent and Instrument Nouns", Cognition, 12, pp.1~24 (1982)
- Conrad, C, "Context Effects in Sentence Comprehension: A Study of the Subjective Lexicon", Memory and Cognition, 2, pp.130~138 (1974)
- Fillmore, L. W., "Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition, In Individual Differences in Language Behavior and Language Ability" (1979), Academic Press
- Fourcin, A. J., "Language Development in the Absence of Expressive Speech, In Foundations of Language Development" (1975), Academic Press
- Gerken, L. A., "Interplay of Function Morphemes and Prosody in Early Language", Developmental Psychology, 29(3), pp.448~457 (1993)
- Golinkoff, R. M., "The Eyes Have It: Lexical and Syntactic Comprehension in a New Paradigm", Journal of child language, 14(1), pp.23~45 (1987)
- Haviland, S. E., "What's New? Acquiring New Information as a Process in Comprehension", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), pp.512~521 (1974)
- Kim, So-Young, "Focus Particles at Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Interfaces: The Acquisition of Only and Even in English", 박사, pp.2011
- König, E., "The Meaning of Focus Particles" (1991), Routledge
- Matsuoka, K., "Addressing the Syntax", Semantics, In Proceedings of the Annual 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp.2004[DOI]
- Matsuoka, K., "The acquisition of Japanese Focus Particles: dake(only) and mo(Also), In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development Supplement" (2006), Cascadilla Press
- Schlesinger, I. M., "Steps to Language: Toward a Theory of Native Language Acquisition" (1982), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Swinney, D. A., "Lexical Access during Sentence Comprehension: (Re)Consideration of Context Effects", Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 18, pp.645~659 (1979)
- Winitz, H, "Comprehension and Production of the", z, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, pp.1981, 10[DOI]