본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국아동의 관계절 이해 양상 연구: 의미적 현저성과 관계절 유형의 영향

The Effects of Semantic Prominence and Syntactic Features on the Comprehension of Relative Clauses by Korean Children

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The present study explores how 4- to 6-year-oldKorean children comprehend four types of relative clauses which arevaried by the semantic prominence of the head noun and the type ofrelative clause (i.e., subject relative clause vs. object relative clause). Results from a picture-selection task confirm the effects of semanticprominence and relative clause types on comprehension of relativeclauses. They also demonstrate age-related variations that youngerchildren are more dependent on the semantic prominence of the headnoun while older children are more affected by the type of relativeclause.

Abstract

The present study explores how 4- to 6-year-oldKorean children comprehend four types of relative clauses which arevaried by the semantic prominence of the head noun and the type ofrelative clause (i.e., subject relative clause vs. object relative clause). Results from a picture-selection task confirm the effects of semanticprominence and relative clause types on comprehension of relativeclauses. They also demonstrate age-related variations that youngerchildren are more dependent on the semantic prominence of the headnoun while older children are more affected by the type of relativeclause.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 김한샘, "현대 국어 사용 빈도 조사2" (2005), 국어국립연구원
  2. 이귀옥, "한국 아동의 관계절 습득 연구", 아동학회지, 13, pp.125~138 (1992), 한국아동학회
  3. 이귀옥, "중국 조선족 아동의 한국어, 중국어 관계절 발달: 주어와 칭성을 중심으로", 이중언어학, (29), pp.247~268 (2005), 이중언어학회
  4. 이미선, "안구이동추적을 통해 살펴본 관계절의 통사처리 과정", 인지과학, 20(4), pp.507~533 (2009), 한국인지과학회
  5. Arnold, J. E, "The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation", Discourse Processes, 31(2), pp.137~162 (2001)
  6. Arnold, J. E., "Children’s Use of Gender and ㅒrder-of-mention during Pronoun Comprehension", Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), pp.527~565 (2007)
  7. Brennan, S. E, "Centering Attention in Discourse", Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(2), pp.137~167 (1995)
  8. Cowles, H. W, "Linguistic and Cognitive Prominence in Anaphor Resolution: Topic, Contrastive Focus and Pronouns", Topoi, 26(1), pp.3~18 (2007)
  9. Crawley, R. A., "The Use of Heuristic Strategiesin the Interpretation of Pronouns", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, pp.254~264 (1990)
  10. Cummins, J, "A Proposal for Action: Strategies for Recognizing Heritage Language Competence as a Learning Resource within the Mainstream Classroom", The Modern Language Journal, 89(4), pp.585~592 (2005)
  11. De Villiers, J. G., "Children’sComprehension of Relative Clauses", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 8(5), pp.499~518 (1979)
  12. Frazier, L., "Filling Gaps: Decision Principles and Structure in Sentence", Cognition, 13(2), pp.187~222 (1983)
  13. Gernsbacher, M. A., "Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention", Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), pp.699~717 (1988)
  14. Gibson, E, "Linguistic Complexity: Locality of Syntactic Dependencies", Cognition, 68, pp.1~76 (1998)
  15. Gibson, E., "The Dependency Locality Theory: A Distance-based Theory of Linguistic Complexity", pp.95~126 (2000), MIT Press
  16. Gibson, E., "Reading Relative Clauses in English", Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2), pp.313~353 (2005)
  17. Hsiao, F., "Processing Relative Clauses in Chinese", Cognition, 90(1), pp.3~27 (2003)
  18. Järvikivi, J., "Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution Contrasting the First-mention and Subject-preference Accounts", Psychological Science, 16(4), pp.260~264 (2005)
  19. Kaiser, E., "Interpreting Pronouns and Demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a Form-specific Approach to Reference Resolution", Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(5), pp.709~748 (2008)
  20. Kaiser, E, "Focusing on Pronouns: Consequences of Subjecthood, Pronominalisation, and Contrastive Focus", Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), pp.1625~1666 (2011)
  21. Keenan, E. L., "Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), pp.63~99 (1977)
  22. King, J. W., "Individual Differences in Syntactic Proocessing: The Role of Working Memory", Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), pp.580~602 (1991)
  23. King, J. W., "Who did What and When? Using Word- and Clause- Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), pp.376~395 (1995)
  24. 권수옥, "Subject Gaps are Really Easier than Object Gaps: A Sentence Processing Study", 응용언어학, 21(1), pp.1~17 (2005), 한국응용언어학회
  25. Kwon, N-Y., "Cognitive and Linguistic Factors Affecting Subject", object Asymmetry: an Eye-tracking Study of Prenominal Relative Clauses in Korean, 2010, pp.86(3), 546~582
  26. Kwee-Ock Lee, "Korean-Chinese Bilingual Children's Comprehension of Korean Relative Clauses : Rethinking of the Structural Distance Hypothesis", 어학연구, 40(4), pp.1059~1080 (2004), 언어교육원
  27. 이귀옥, "Quantitative Differences in the Processing of Relative Clauses between Monolingual and Bilingual Speakers", 담화와 인지, 11(1), pp.215~236 (2004), 담화·인지언어학회
  28. 이미선, "Subject-gap preference in processing of Korean relative clauses: An eye-tracking study", 언어, 34(2), pp.359~373 (2009), 한국언어학회
  29. Lin, C. C., "Subject Preference in the Processing of Relative Clauses in Chinese", pp.254~260 (2006), Cascadilla Proceedings Project
  30. Object Asymmetries in the Processing of Relative Clauses in Japanese, "Subject", pp.2003, Miyamoto, E. T.
  31. O’Grady, W., "Syntactic Development" (1997), The University of Chicago Press
  32. O’Grady, W., "Look at the Acquisition of Relative Clauses", Lecture to the 2011 National Heritage Language Institute (2011)
  33. O’Grady, W., "A subject-object Asymmetry in the Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Korean as a Second Language", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), pp.433~448 (2003)
  34. Patterson, C, "The Effect of Local Discourse Coherence on Pronoun Resolution: an Eye-tracking Study", Essex Graduate Student Papers in Language and Linguistics, 13, pp.96~119 (2012)
  35. Sheldon, A, "The Role of Parallel Function in the Acquisition of Relative Clauses in English", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(3), pp.272~281 (1974)
  36. Song, H-J., "Discourse Prominence Effects on 2.5-year-old Children’s Interpretation of Pronouns", Lingua, 117, pp.1959~1987 (2007)
  37. Suzuki, T, "A Case-marking Cue for Filler-gap Dependencies in Children’s Relative Clauses in Japanese", Journal of Child Language, 38(5), pp.1084~1095 (2011)
  38. Tavakolian, S., "The Conjoined-clause Analysis of Relative Clauses and Other Structures", pp.37~83 (1978), University of Massachusetts, Linguistics Department, GLSA Publication
  39. Traxler, M. J., "Processing Subject and Object Relative Clauses: Evidence from Eye Movements", Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), pp.69~90 (2002)
  40. Ueno, M., "An ERP Study of the Processing of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in Japanese", Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(5), pp.646~688 (2008)
  41. Van Rij, J., "Pronoun Processing: Computational, Behavioural and Psychophysiological Studies in Children and Adults", Ph.D., pp.2012
  42. Wubs, E., "Tell me a Story! Children’s Capacity for Topic Shift", pp.313~324 (2009), Cascadilla Proceedings Project

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)