본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어와 한국어 이동 동사의 의미 확장 양상 비교 연구

A Comparative Study of the Motion Verbs go and come in English and kata ‘go’ and ota ‘come’ in Korean

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study offers a corpus-based analysis of the polysemy of the motion verbs go and come in English and kata ‘go’ and ota ‘come’ in Korean. Both motion verbs in English and Korean are intrinsically deictic indicating directionality in their nature. In this study, using corpus-data, we first discuss the prototypical meaning of go/come in English and kata/ota in Korean, focusing on their cross-linguistic differences existing in the use of these motion verbs. Furthermore, we examine the metaphorical meaning extension of the motion verbs, and compare their uses. In this corpus-based analysis of the motion verbs, we point out that the semantic extension of the motion verbs in both languages occur from the spatial domain to the non-spatial domains, and it generally involves time, perspective and change of state. Nevertheless, the metaphorical uses of the motion verbs in English differ from those of Korean. Finally, we point out some limitations in the previous analyses of the semantic extensions of motion verbs, and propose the concept of merge and separation as a new way of analyzing the phenomena

Abstract

This study offers a corpus-based analysis of the polysemy of the motion verbs go and come in English and kata ‘go’ and ota ‘come’ in Korean. Both motion verbs in English and Korean are intrinsically deictic indicating directionality in their nature. In this study, using corpus-data, we first discuss the prototypical meaning of go/come in English and kata/ota in Korean, focusing on their cross-linguistic differences existing in the use of these motion verbs. Furthermore, we examine the metaphorical meaning extension of the motion verbs, and compare their uses. In this corpus-based analysis of the motion verbs, we point out that the semantic extension of the motion verbs in both languages occur from the spatial domain to the non-spatial domains, and it generally involves time, perspective and change of state. Nevertheless, the metaphorical uses of the motion verbs in English differ from those of Korean. Finally, we point out some limitations in the previous analyses of the semantic extensions of motion verbs, and propose the concept of merge and separation as a new way of analyzing the phenomena

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 남승호, "한국어 이동 동사의 의미구조와 논항교체", 어학연구, 39(1), pp.111~145 (2003)
  2. 박영선, "영어와 한국어의 문화적 이해를 통한 어휘사용 차이 연구 : 영어동사 come, go를 중심으로", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2008
  3. 신홍명, "'가다'의 의미확장에 대한 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2004
  4. 이기동, "동사 ‘오다’, ‘가다’의 의미 분석", 말, 2, pp.139~160 (1977)
  5. 이종열, "‘가다’의 다의성에 대한 인지의미론 연구", 한국어 의미학, 3, pp.97~118 (1998)
  6. 이한규, "한국어 담화표지어 ‘아니’의 의미", 현대문법연구, (67), pp.145~171 (2012), 현대문법학회
  7. 秦麗鳳, "한국어 동사 '가다'와 '오다'의 의미에 대한 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2008
  8. 주보현, "영어 이동동사 come과 go의 벡터 관점 의미 분석", 석사, 영어영문학, pp.2011
  9. 주보현, "영어 이동동사 come과 go의 유표성 양상에 관한 연구", 언어연구, 28(2), pp.355~371 (2011), 언어정보연구소
  10. 전수태, "국어 이동동사의 의미연구" (1987), 한신문화사
  11. 崔鎬哲, "현대 국어 敍述語의 의미 연구 : 義素 設定을 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문, pp.1993
  12. Dirven, R., "The Ubiquity of Metaphor", pp.85~119 (1985), John Benjamins
  13. Fillmore, C., "Lectures on Deixis" (1997), CSLI Publications
  14. Ha, S., "A Corpus-based Cross-linguistic Study of the Motion Verbs go and come in English and kata ‘go’ and ota ‘come’ in Korean", Proceedings of the Second Asia Pacific Corpus Linguistic Conference, pp.187~188 (2014), Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  15. Hofmann, T., "Realms of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics" (1993), Longman
  16. Huddleston, R., "Cambridge Grammar of English" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  17. 권연진, "The Polysemy of the Motion Verbs go and come", 언어과학, 17(2), pp.131~149 (2010), 한국언어과학회
  18. Lakoff, G., "Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
  19. Lakoff, G., "Metaphors We Live By" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
  20. Langacker, R., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. (Vol. 1)" (1987), Stanford University Press
  21. Langacker, R., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. (Vol 2)" (1991), Stanford University Press
  22. Langacker, R, "Reference-Point Constructions", Cognitive Linguistics, 4, pp.1~38 (1993)
  23. Langacker, R, "Usage-Based Models of Language", pp.1~65 (2000), CSLI Publications
  24. Sweetser, E., "From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  25. Tyler, A., "The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  26. Viberg, Å., "The Polysemy of the Swedish Verb komma ‘come’: A View from Translation Corpora", Meaning through Language Contrast, 2, pp.75~105 (2003)
  27. Vyvyan, E., "Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction" (2006), Edinburgh University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)