본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

말뭉치에 나타난 동사 ‘가다’의 격틀과논항 실현 양상 연구

The case frame and arguments of the Korean verb ‘kata (go)’ that appears in corpus

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper aims to describe the case frame and argument structure of the verb ‘kata (go)’ in a corpus. Since ‘kata’ is a polysemous verb, the corpus usage was classified depending on it’s meaning. Then case frame and argument realization were examined. Through this quantitative approach, it was found that ‘kata’ as movement verb has a high demand of ‘goal’. In addition, the ratio of the ‘goal’ combined with particles ‘ey’ and ‘lo’ was similar, while the ratio of ‘goal’ combined with ‘ul’ was very low. The ‘goal’ combined with ‘lo’ is shown to be preferred in certain phrases. In addition, the type of noun that appears as ‘goal’ was examined. Meanwhile, the transitive use of ‘kata’ was examined in relation to the use of movement verb. In some of the use of transitive verbs and serial verb construction, the realization aspect of the constructions related to the ‘purpose’ of movement was also described.

Abstract

This paper aims to describe the case frame and argument structure of the verb ‘kata (go)’ in a corpus. Since ‘kata’ is a polysemous verb, the corpus usage was classified depending on it’s meaning. Then case frame and argument realization were examined. Through this quantitative approach, it was found that ‘kata’ as movement verb has a high demand of ‘goal’. In addition, the ratio of the ‘goal’ combined with particles ‘ey’ and ‘lo’ was similar, while the ratio of ‘goal’ combined with ‘ul’ was very low. The ‘goal’ combined with ‘lo’ is shown to be preferred in certain phrases. In addition, the type of noun that appears as ‘goal’ was examined. Meanwhile, the transitive use of ‘kata’ was examined in relation to the use of movement verb. In some of the use of transitive verbs and serial verb construction, the realization aspect of the constructions related to the ‘purpose’ of movement was also described.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 고광주, "국어의 격교체 구문 연구", 한국어학, 18, pp.389~408 (2003), 한국어학회
  2. 김선혜, "동사 ‘오다’의 격틀과 논항 구조-말뭉치에 나타난 조사와 논항 실현 양상을 중심으로-", 國語學, (102), pp.187~217 (2022), 국어학회[DOI]
  3. 남승호, "처소논항 교체의 의미론: 자동사와 형용사를 중심으로", 어학연구, 38(1), pp.295~318 (2002), 언어교육원
  4. 문병열, "문장 성분의 필수성 판별에 대하여", 국어문학, 76(76), pp.1~41 (2021), 국어문학회[DOI]
  5. 민경모, "‘-거리다’ 시늉제움직씨의 유형 분류에 대하여- 격틀 및 논항의 명사 종류를 중심으로 -", 언어사실과 관점, 47, pp.321~357 (2019), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
  6. 신서인, "동사 “생각하다”의 문형에 대한 고찰", 冠嶽語文硏究, 34, pp.191~212 (2009), 서울대 국문과
  7. 유현경, "조사 ‘에를’의 범주와 의미", 언어, 32(1), pp.105~123 (2007), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  8. 이규호, "의문사와 부정사의 의미와 용법", 國語學, (82), pp.153~180 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
  9. 이기동, "동사 ‘가다’의 의미", 한글, 247, pp.133~158 (2000), 한글학회
  10. 이정훈, "국어 조사의 인허조건과 통합관계", 언어, 30(1), pp.173~193 (2005), 한국언어학회
  11. 은아문, "‘NP-에", 를’ 교체 구문에 나타난 ‘를’의 의미 - 이동 동사 구문을 중심으로, 2020, pp.53, 141~163[DOI]
  12. 임동훈, "한국어의 장소 표시 방법들", 國語學, (82), pp.101~125 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
  13. 정주리, "'가다' 동사의 의미와 구문에 대한 구문문법적 접근", 한국어 의미학, 17, pp.267~294 (2005), 한국어의미학회
  14. 정희정, "‘에’를 중심으로 본 토씨의 의미−‘에’와 ‘로, 를’의 의미비교", 국어학, 17, pp.153~175 (1988), 국어학회
  15. 최정진, "‘-에’, ‘-로’, ‘-를’ 치환과 ‘가-’ 구문의 분화 양상", 열린정신 인문학 연구, 11(2), pp.217~243 (2010), 인문학연구소[DOI]
  16. 홍승아, "의문사의 기능 확대 용법", 한민족문화연구, 63(63), pp.247~272 (2018), 한민족문화학회[DOI]
  17. 연세대언어정보연구원, "연세한국어사전" (1998), 동아출판사
  18. "표준국어대사전"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)