본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주어를 찾아서

In Pursuit of the Subject

김원호
한국언어과학회 (The Korean Association Of Language Sciences)|2014.08|언어과학 (Journal of Language Sciences)|제21권 제3호|pp. 23-44

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제표지coding의미기능semantic functionscase markers격표지pragmatic functions화용기능코딩topic marker문법적 주어grammatical subject
주제분류언어학

초록

A language codes the arguments in a clause with respect to a verb. In Korean, the relations between a verb and its arguments are marked by case markers or particles. These morphemes transparently indicate grammatical functions in agglutinative languages. However, the nominative case marker does not necessarily indicate a grammatical subject. The concept of a grammatical subject is not always synonymous with that of a nominative case marked noun phrase. And all orders of arguments are acceptable provided the verb is final. This makes the configuration available for coding of an information structure. A grammatical subject, if any, should be defined by syntactic properties, which refer to the involvement of a subject in a grammatical construction. This paper explores some of these properties of a grammatical subject in the honorification, the equi control, the anaphora, the plural copy, the antecedent of zero pronoun, and the subject-to-object raising. These constructions are conditioned by a grammatical subject in one way or another. However, the subject does not always refer to these constructions. In describing these sentences in Korean, this paper proposes that some semantic features such as human and animacy, and relatively transparent case marked semantic functions should be considered, as well as a pragmatic function which is marked by a topic marker and a word order

Abstract

A language codes the arguments in a clause with respect to a verb. In Korean, the relations between a verb and its arguments are marked by case markers or particles. These morphemes transparently indicate grammatical functions in agglutinative languages. However, the nominative case marker does not necessarily indicate a grammatical subject. The concept of a grammatical subject is not always synonymous with that of a nominative case marked noun phrase. And all orders of arguments are acceptable provided the verb is final. This makes the configuration available for coding of an information structure. A grammatical subject, if any, should be defined by syntactic properties, which refer to the involvement of a subject in a grammatical construction. This paper explores some of these properties of a grammatical subject in the honorification, the equi control, the anaphora, the plural copy, the antecedent of zero pronoun, and the subject-to-object raising. These constructions are conditioned by a grammatical subject in one way or another. However, the subject does not always refer to these constructions. In describing these sentences in Korean, this paper proposes that some semantic features such as human and animacy, and relatively transparent case marked semantic functions should be considered, as well as a pragmatic function which is marked by a topic marker and a word order

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 이익섭, "국어 문법론" (1985), 학연사
  2. 김원호, "수동태: 형태와 기능", 한국어학, 8, pp.131~157 (1998)
  3. 김원호, "비명제 복수 청자: 한국어 복수 형태소 반복에 관하여", 현대문법연구, 12, pp.215~223 (1998)
  4. 김원호, "한국어의 재귀대명사: 형태와 기능", 언어과학, 20(1), pp.25~44 (2013), 한국언어과학회
  5. Bhat, D., "Grammatical Relations: The Evidence Against Their Necessity and Universality" (1991), Routledge
  6. Bresnan, J., "The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations" (1982), MIT Press
  7. Burzio, L, "Condition on Representation and Romance Syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 14, pp.193~221 (1983)
  8. Chang, S, "Korean Reflexive Pronoun Caki and Its Referential NP's Point of View", Language Studies, 13(1), pp.35~48 (1977)
  9. Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  10. Comrie, B., "Language Universal and Linguistic Typology" (1989), University of Chicago Press
  11. Delancy, S, "Agentivity and Syntax", CLS, 21(part 2), pp.1~12 (1985)
  12. Foley, W, "The Role of Theory in Language Description", pp.131~174 (1993), Mouton de Gruyter
  13. Frajzyngier, Z, "Non-Propositional Addressees", CLS, 25, pp.41~49 (1989)
  14. Frajzyngier, Z., "Grammaticalization of the Complex Sentence: A Case Study in Chadic" (1996), John Benjamins
  15. Fromkin, V., "An Introduction to Language" (2003), Thomson
  16. Gazdar, G., "Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar" (1985), Harvard University Press
  17. Hong, K, "Subjecthood Tests in Korean", Language Studies, 30(1), pp.99~136 (1994)
  18. Hock, H., "Principles of Historical Linguistics" (1988), Mouton de Gruyter
  19. Keenan, A, "Subject and Topic", pp.303~333 (1976), Academic Press
  20. Keenan, E., "Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar", Linguistic Iinquiry, 8, pp.63~100 (1977)
  21. Kim, W., "Grammatical Relations and Anaphora in Korean", 박사, pp.1994
  22. 김원호, "The Passive with an Accusative Nominal:A Semantic Account", 언어과학, 9(1), pp.19~31 (2002), 한국언어과학회
  23. 김원호, "The -ko Complement in Korean: An Epistemic Modality", 언어과학, 10(2), pp.39~50 (2003), 한국언어과학회
  24. 김원호, "Deontic Complementizers in Korean", 언어과학, 15(3), pp.201~215 (2008), 한국언어과학회
  25. 김원호, "From Semantics to Pragmatics: the Accusative Case in Korean", 언어과학, 18(2), pp.219~230 (2011), 한국언어과학회
  26. Kuh, H, "Plural Copying in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.239~250 (1987)
  27. Kuno, S, "Pronominalization, Reflexivization, and Direct Discourse", Linguistic Inquiry, 3(2), pp.161~195 (1972)
  28. Lee, H., "Double-Nominative Constructions in Korean", Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 2, pp.489~506 (1988)
  29. Legendre, G, "Inversion with French Experiencer Verbs", Language, 65, pp.752~782 (1989)
  30. Li, C., "Subject and Topic", pp.457~489 (1976), Academic Press
  31. Mathesius, V, "A Prague School Reader in Linguistics", pp.59~67 (1928), Indiana University Press
  32. O’Grady, W, "The Interpretation of Korean Anaphora: The Role and Representation of Grammatical Relations", Language, 63, pp.251~277 (1987)
  33. Perlmutter, D, "Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis", BLS, 4, pp.157~189 (1978)
  34. Perlmutter, D, "Current Approach to Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 13)", pp.195~229 (1980), Academic Press
  35. Shibatani, M, "Grammatical Relations and Surface Cases", Language, 53, pp.789~089 (1977)
  36. Talmy, L., "Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application", pp.225~282 (1983), Plenum Press
  37. Verma, M. K., "Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages" (1990), CSLI Publications
  38. Williams, E., "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.203~238 (1980)
  39. Yang, I., "Korean Syntax: Case Markers, Delimiters, Complementation and Relativization", 박사, pp.1972
  40. Youn, C., "A Relational Analysis of Korean Multiple Nominative Constructions", 박사, pp.1989

관련 논문AI추천

한국어의 재귀대명사: 형태와 기능김원호한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2013 · 제20권 제1호이른바 주격조사 ‘－에서’에 관하여이정택한말연구학회 · 한말연구2010 · 제27호한국어 주격표지, 격표지의 생략, 초점, 그리고 화제이종근사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2021 · 제29권 제4호韓國語의 眞性 主語를 찾아서목정수한국어문교육연구회 · 어문연구(語文硏究)2016 · 제44권 제3호주제와 주어의 통사론 - 주격 중출 구문을 중심으로 -박철우사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2025 · 제103호Two Types of Multiple Nominatives in Korean박상희사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2020 · 제86호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

한국인 영어 학습자의 비대격동사와 비능격동사 문법성 판단에 관한 연구안동환, 김수연pp. 1-22국어의 동일 조음 위치 폐쇄음 연쇄에 대한 실험음성학적 연구김태경pp. 45-64시간에 따른 사건 전개 및 긴장 정도 추이 연구 - KBS 뉴스의 {북한}을 중심으로박건숙pp. 65-96한국어 타동성 처소교체 구문에 대한 중국인 학습자의 논항 구조 인식 연구박선희pp. 97-116한국어 주격중출 가설 검증: 유아의 실제발화를 중심으로박휴용pp. 117-142
원문 보기