영어 이동동사 come과 go의 유표성 양상에 관한 연구
A Study on the Aspects of Markedness in English Motion Verbs Come and Go
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the aspects of markedness or asymmetry in English motion verbs come and go. The following claims are made in this paper. First, it is claimed that the aspect of neutralization could be used to argue for the unmarkedness of English verb go when compared to English come. Neutralization here has to do with the property to function as a hyperonym for the two contrasting terms. Second, it is shown through the corpus analysis that the high frequency and formal distribution patterns of various forms involving English go strengthen the claim that English go is an unmarked term. Third, it is shown through corpus analysis that English verb go occurs with the adjectives both with positive and negative meanings, while the verb come predominantly with the ones with positive meanings, which suggests the unmarkedness of English go. Fourth, it is suggested that the (un)markedness of cognitive complexity need to be determined on the basis of linguistic as well as extralinguistic analysis, and that considering the previous discussions and our corpus data, we are sure about the unmarkedness of the verb go.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the aspects of markedness or asymmetry in English motion verbs come and go. The following claims are made in this paper. First, it is claimed that the aspect of neutralization could be used to argue for the unmarkedness of English verb go when compared to English come. Neutralization here has to do with the property to function as a hyperonym for the two contrasting terms. Second, it is shown through the corpus analysis that the high frequency and formal distribution patterns of various forms involving English go strengthen the claim that English go is an unmarked term. Third, it is shown through corpus analysis that English verb go occurs with the adjectives both with positive and negative meanings, while the verb come predominantly with the ones with positive meanings, which suggests the unmarkedness of English go. Fourth, it is suggested that the (un)markedness of cognitive complexity need to be determined on the basis of linguistic as well as extralinguistic analysis, and that considering the previous discussions and our corpus data, we are sure about the unmarkedness of the verb go.
참고문헌 (28)
- 박영선, "영어와 한국어의 문화적 이해를 통한 어휘사용 차이 연구 : 영어동사 Come, Go를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2008
- 박주영, "직시적 이동 동사 come과 go의 의미연구: 인지언어학적 분석", 석사, pp.2009
- 유승만, "로만 야콥슨의 유표성 이론 연구", 러시아연구, 16(2), pp.271~292 (2006), 러시아연구소
- 임지룡, "유표성의 인지적 의미분석" (1997), 박이정
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
- 주보현, "영어 이동동사 come과 go의 벡터 관점 의미 분석", 석사, pp.2011
- Battistella, E, "Markedness: The Evaluative Superstructure of Language" (1990), State University of New York Press
- Clark, E, "Is He Coming or Going? On the Acquisition of Deictic Verbs", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, pp.559~572 (1974)
- Croft, W, "Typology and Universals" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Elšik, V, "Markedness and Language Change: The Romani Sample" (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
- Givón, T, "Markedness as Meta-Iconicity: Distributional and Cognitive Correlates of Syntactic Structure. in : Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam", pp.25~69 (1995), John Benjamins
- Goddard, C, "The Semantics of Coming and Going", Pragmatics, 7(2), pp.147~162 (2010)
- Haspelmath, M, "Against Markedness", Journal of Linguistics, 42, pp.25~70 (2006)
- Langacker, R, "Reference-Point Constructions", Cognitive Linguistics, 4, pp.1~38 (1993)
- Levin, B, "English Verb Classes and Alternations" (1993), University of Chicago Press
- Laurence, R, "Deixis. in : The Handbook of Pragmatics", pp.97~120 (2006), Blackwell Publishing
- Lyons, J, "Semantics 2" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Radden. G, "The Conceptual Motivation of Fictive Motion, in : Studies in Linguistic Motivation", pp.221~248 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
- Dressler, W, "System-Independent Morphological Naturalness, in : Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology", pp.25~28 (1987), John Benjamins
- Miller, A, "Language and Perception" (1976), Harvard University Press
- Nakazawa, T, "A Typology of the Path of Deictic Motion Verbs as Path Conflating Verbs: The Entailment of Arrival and the Deictic Center", Poznán Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 45(3), pp.385~403 (2009)
- Nicolle, S, "Go-and-V, Come-and-V, Go-V and Come-V: A Corpus Based Account of Deictic Movement Verb Constructions", English Text Construction, 2(2), pp.185~208 (2009)
- Perez, A, "Time in Motion: Grammaticalisation of the Be Going To Construction in English", La Trobe Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, pp.49~64 (1990)
- Casad, E, "Motion Metaphorized: The Case of Coming and Going, in : The Explanation of a New Paradigm in Linguistics", pp.423~458 (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
- Shen, X, "Markedness Theory and Linguistic Asymmetry" (1999), Jiangxi Education Press
- Silva, C, "Adverbial -ing", Linguistic Inquiry, 6, pp.346~350 (1975)
- Talmy, L, "Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring" (2000), MIT Press
- Asher, R, "Morphology, Natural, in : The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics", pp.590~598 (1994), Pergamon Press