인상구문의 여격 간섭효과에 대한 비교연구
A Comparative Study of Dative Intervention Effect in Raising Constructions
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper deals with the intervention effect of dative experiencers and the parametric variation in terms of A-movement between French and English raising constructions. According to the series of Chomsky's Minimalist Program, a general A-movement occurs in order of Agree-Move. Agree is a prerequisite step towards Move and is subject to the locality conditions, but Move is not. In order to address the problems with A-movement, Goto(2013) proposes the order "Move-Agree" in English raising constructions. We will observe the corelation between Move and Agree and verify that, especially in French counterparts, quasi-argument expletives and real expletives must be distinguished in terms of A-movement. We conclude that French real expletives do not move but must be merged in the Spec-TP of the main clause. Based on the fact that there exist different syntactic operations in these constructions and various authors' opinions in acceptability, French counterparts can be accounted for by both the two orders. Finally, we will verify French dative experiencers must be differently taken care of from the English counterparts
Abstract
This paper deals with the intervention effect of dative experiencers and the parametric variation in terms of A-movement between French and English raising constructions. According to the series of Chomsky's Minimalist Program, a general A-movement occurs in order of Agree-Move. Agree is a prerequisite step towards Move and is subject to the locality conditions, but Move is not. In order to address the problems with A-movement, Goto(2013) proposes the order "Move-Agree" in English raising constructions. We will observe the corelation between Move and Agree and verify that, especially in French counterparts, quasi-argument expletives and real expletives must be distinguished in terms of A-movement. We conclude that French real expletives do not move but must be merged in the Spec-TP of the main clause. Based on the fact that there exist different syntactic operations in these constructions and various authors' opinions in acceptability, French counterparts can be accounted for by both the two orders. Finally, we will verify French dative experiencers must be differently taken care of from the English counterparts
참고문헌 (19)
- Boskovic, Z, "On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal Theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4), pp.589~644 (2007)
- Burzio, L., "Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach" (1986), D. Reidel
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N, "Problems of Projection: Extensions", ms, pp.2014
- Goto, N, "Interplay Between Agree and Move", ms, pp.2013
- Huot, H., "Constructions Infinitives du Français" (1981), Droz
- Kayne, R-S., "Syntaxe du Français: Le cycle Transformationnel" (1977), Editions du Seuil
- Malhotra, S., "Movement and Intervention Effects: Evidence from Hindi", Urdu, University of Maryland, 2011
- McGinnis, M, "Locality and Inert Case", NELS, 28, pp.267~281 (1998)
- McGinnis, M., "Locality in A-Movement", Ph. D, pp.1998
- Melis, L., "The dative in Modern French. The Dative: Descriptive Studies. Vol. 1" (1996), John Benjamins
- Nique, Ch, "Grammaire Générative: Hypothèses et Argumentations" (1978), Armand Colin
- Rouveret, A, "Specifying Reference to the Subject: French Causative and Conditions on Representations", Linguistic Inquiry, 11(1), pp.97~202 (1980)
- Sandfeld, Kr, "Syntaxe du Français Contemporain: L'infinitif. Vol. 2" (1965), Droz
- Storoshenko, D. R, "Seems Like a Double Object", NWLC, 22, pp.257~265 (2006)
- Storoshenko, D. R., "A Cross-linguistic Account of Reflexivity Using Synchronous Tree Adjoining Grammar", Ph. D, pp.2010
- Vergnaud, J-R., "French Relative Clauses", Ph. D, pp.1974