Notes on the Intervention Paradox
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we explore the intervention paradox in a range of A-movement constructions in English, French, and Italian. Traditionally, the interaction between raising and PP experiencers has been explained as a defective intervention constraint in Chomsky(2000). However, the defective intervention constraint cannot fully explain the intervention paradox. To explain the intervention paradox, we propose that the focus property of PP experiencers can explain the intervention paradox. That is, we assume that PP experiencers with the contrastive focus reading should be moved into TP-internal Focus Phrase, as in English raising constructions, but those without the contrastive focus reading cannot, as in French and Italian. Thus, PP experiencers in Italian raising constructions are in A-positions, which are visible in A-movement, causing the intervention effect. However, those in English raising constructions are in the Spec of TP-internal Focus Phrase, which is A'-position. Hence, this allows the embedded TP subjects to move to the Spec of the matrix TP without any intervention effect of PP experiencers
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the intervention paradox in a range of A-movement constructions in English, French, and Italian. Traditionally, the interaction between raising and PP experiencers has been explained as a defective intervention constraint in Chomsky(2000). However, the defective intervention constraint cannot fully explain the intervention paradox. To explain the intervention paradox, we propose that the focus property of PP experiencers can explain the intervention paradox. That is, we assume that PP experiencers with the contrastive focus reading should be moved into TP-internal Focus Phrase, as in English raising constructions, but those without the contrastive focus reading cannot, as in French and Italian. Thus, PP experiencers in Italian raising constructions are in A-positions, which are visible in A-movement, causing the intervention effect. However, those in English raising constructions are in the Spec of TP-internal Focus Phrase, which is A'-position. Hence, this allows the embedded TP subjects to move to the Spec of the matrix TP without any intervention effect of PP experiencers
참고문헌 (22)
- Anagnostopoulou, E, "The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
- Boeckx, C, "Conflicting C-command Requirements, In Aspects of the Syntax of Agreement", pp.227~250 (1999), Routledge
- Boeckx, C., "Raising Across Experiencers Cross-linguistically. Aspects of the Syntax of Agreement" (2008), Routledge
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N., "A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory, In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
- Collins, C., "A Smuggling Approach to Raising in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 36(2), pp.289~298 (2005)
- Fox, D., "Reconstruction, Binding Theory, and the Interpretation of Chains", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.157~196 (1999)
- Hartman, J., "(Non-)Intervention in A-movement: Some Cross- constructional and Cross-linguistic Consideration" (2011), MIT
- Holmberg, A, "Agreement and Movement in Icelandic Raising Constructions", Lingua, 11(4), pp.651~673 (2004)
- Hornstein, N., "Case Theory and Preposition Stranding", Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.55~92 (1981)
- Jayaseelan. K., "IP-Internal Topic and Focus Phrases", Studia Linguistica, 55(1), pp.39~75 (2001)
- Kitahara, H., "Elementary Operations and Optimal Derivations" (1997), MIT Press
- 권기양, "Some Notes on Parallel Movement", 언어과학, 16(2), pp.165~187 (2009), 한국언어과학회
- Lasnik, H., "Complement Object Deletion", Linguistic Inquiry, 5, pp.559~582 (1974)
- Where does Binding Theory Apply? Technical Report, "Lebeaux, D.", NEC Research Institute, ~ (1998)
- McGinnis, M., "Locality in A-movement", 박사, pp.1998
- Müller, G., "Order Preservation, Parallel Movement, and the Emergence of the Unmarked, In Optimality-Theoretic Syntax", pp.279~313 (2001), MIT Press
- Perlmutter, D., "The 1 Advancement Exclusiveness Law, In Studies in Relational Grammar 2" (1984), University of Chicago Press
- Postal, P., "Cross-over Phenomena" (1971), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Torrego, E., "Arguments for a Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations Based on Clitics, In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program", pp.249~268 (2002), Blackwell