한국어 균열 구문의 ‘것’: 빈 NP 채우기로서의 ‘것’
Kes in the Korean Cleft Construction: Kes Filling in an Empty NP
2
조회
0
다운로드
19
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we propose that the Korean kes cleft construction is formed when an nP or an NP inside a DP on a predicative position of copular clauses moves to a subject position after N-to-D head movement. Kes is inserted in an empty NP position which would be ungrammatical after adnominal clauses or genitive NP_s, if nothing happens. We claim that under this analysis, dual categories (N or Comp as in Kang 2006) or uses (a nominalizer use or a referential use as in Kim&Sells 2007) of kes in the Korean cleft construction are only apparent. The dual properties of a kes-phrase follow from the well-known observation that copular clauses have predicative and equative uses and the assumption that a predicative use obtains when a subject NP moves into [Spec, IP] and an equative use obtains when a predicate NP moves into the position. We also show that Kim&Sells's 2007 observation that a kes-phrase may not have a predicative use receives a straightforward account under our analysis.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose that the Korean kes cleft construction is formed when an nP or an NP inside a DP on a predicative position of copular clauses moves to a subject position after N-to-D head movement. Kes is inserted in an empty NP position which would be ungrammatical after adnominal clauses or genitive NP_s, if nothing happens. We claim that under this analysis, dual categories (N or Comp as in Kang 2006) or uses (a nominalizer use or a referential use as in Kim&Sells 2007) of kes in the Korean cleft construction are only apparent. The dual properties of a kes-phrase follow from the well-known observation that copular clauses have predicative and equative uses and the assumption that a predicative use obtains when a subject NP moves into [Spec, IP] and an equative use obtains when a predicate NP moves into the position. We also show that Kim&Sells's 2007 observation that a kes-phrase may not have a predicative use receives a straightforward account under our analysis.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강명윤, "DP와 국어의 명사구-지시사 ‘그’를 중심으로", 한국어학, 13, pp.15~51 (2001)
- 김선웅, "특정성과 서술성의 통사론: 영어와 한국어의 (‘것'-)분열문을 중심으로", 언어학, 18(3), pp.167~185 (2010), 대한언어학회
- 김의수, "‘이다’ 재론", 형태론, 4(2), pp.349~356 (2002), 형태론
- 목정수, "기능동사 ‘이다’ 구성의 쟁점", 언어학, 22, pp.245~289 (1998)
- 시정곤, "최기용(2001)에 나타난 몇 가지 의문들", 형태론, 4(2), pp.339~348 (2002), 형태론
- 신선경, "‘것이다’ 구문에 관하여", 국어학, 23, pp.119~158 (1993)
- 엄정호, "소위 지정사 구문의 통사구조", 국어학, 18, pp.110~130 (1989)
- 엄정호, "‘이다’의 범주 규정", 국어 국문학, 110, pp.317~332 (1993)
- 엄정호, "‘-이다’의 ‘이’는 조사인가", 형태론, 2, pp.333~343 (2000)
- 우순조, "모빌구조와 표지이론에 의한 한국어 통사 의미 기술", 언어학, 22, pp.291~328 (1998)
- 우순조, "‘이다’와 ‘아니다’의 상관성-표지 개념에 의한 분석", 형태론, 2, pp.129~138 (2000)
- 이정훈, "‘이다’ 구문의 ‘-으시-’ 일치 현상", 國語學, (43), pp.209~246 (2004), 국어학회
- 최기용, "의미역 배정과 관련된 명사의 성격에 대하여", 생성 문법 연구, 6, pp.85~119 (1996)
- 최기용, "‘-이다’의 ‘-이’는 주격 조사이다", 형태론, 3, pp.101~112 (2001)
- 최기용, "시정곤(2002) 및 김의수(2002)에서 지적된 몇 가지 의문에 답하여", 형태론, 5(1), pp.111~121 (2003), 형태론
- 홍용철, "한국어의 명사 확장범주", 언어, 31(4), pp.657~684 (2006), 한국언어학회
- 홍용철, "한국어의 후치 요소와 명사 확장 범주", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.743~768 (2008), 한국생성문법학회
- 홍용철, "한국어 명사 외곽 수식어들의 어순과 명사구 구조", 생성문법연구, 20(1), pp.27~50 (2010), 한국생성문법학회
- Alexiadou, Artemis, "Noun phrase in the generative perspective" (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
- Bowers,John, "The syntax of predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.591~656 (1993)
- Choi,Kiyong, "On the so-called copular construction in Korean", Eonohak, 15, pp.397~413 (1993)
- Chomsky,Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky,Noam, "Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20" (2001), MITWPIL
- Chomsky, Noam, "Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Grimshaw,Jane, "Argument structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Pronouns in a minimalist setting. In University of Maryland working papers in linguistics, vol 14, "Hornstein,Norbert", College Park, 47~80 (2006)
- Jhang,Sea-Eun, "Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives", 박사, pp.1994
- Kang,Bosook, "Some peculiarities of Korean kes cleft constructions", Studia Linguistica, 60, pp.251~281 (2006)
- 김종복, "Some Remarks on Korean Nominalizer kes and Information Structure", 생성문법연구, 17(4), pp.479~494 (2007), 한국생성문법학회
- Kim,Soo-Yeon, "Dependencies: A study of anaphoricity and scrambling", 박사, pp.1996
- Kim,Soo-Yeon, "What should we do with Condition A", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 25, pp.291~314 (2000)
- Moro,Andrea, "Dynamic antisymmetry" (2000), MIT Press
- 손근원, "Kes-clefts, Connectedness Effects, and the Implications Thereof*", 생성문법연구, 14(4), pp.561~571 (2004), 한국생성문법학회
- Korean Linguistics Vol. 11, "What the Korean copula reveals about the interaction of morphology and syntax. In Japanese", pp.2003, Yoon,James