본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

“것” 분열 구문의 초점 요소에 대한 기저 생성 분석

A Base-generation Analysis of the Focused Phrase in the "kes" Cleft Construction

2

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

A Base-Generation Analysis of the Focused Phrase in the kes Cleft Construction. It is well known that the kes cleft construction shows connectedness effects since the focused phrase in the pivot position behaves as if it is in a gap position of kes clause. A way of accounting for its connectedness effects would be to say that the focused phrase moves from the gap position to the pivot position. This paper argues that the connectedness effects don’t provide an argument for this kind of movement analysis, and claims that the focused element is base-generated in the pivot position.

Abstract

A Base-Generation Analysis of the Focused Phrase in the kes Cleft Construction. It is well known that the kes cleft construction shows connectedness effects since the focused phrase in the pivot position behaves as if it is in a gap position of kes clause. A way of accounting for its connectedness effects would be to say that the focused phrase moves from the gap position to the pivot position. This paper argues that the connectedness effects don’t provide an argument for this kind of movement analysis, and claims that the focused element is base-generated in the pivot position.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 김영희, "쪼갠문의 기능과 통사", 어문학, 69, pp.65~90 (2000)
  2. 김선웅, "특정성과 서술성의 통사론: 영어와 한국어의 (‘것'-)분열문을 중심으로", 언어학, 18(3), pp.167~185 (2010), 대한언어학회
  3. 박소영, "한국어 분열문의 통사구조와 생략이론", 언어학, (68), pp.35~57 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  4. 박소영, "‘이다’와 한국어 초점 구문에 대하여", 國語學, (71), pp.3~32 (2014), 국어학회[DOI]
  5. 박정섭, "프랑스어와 한국어의 계사구문 연구", 프랑스어문교육, (45), pp.163~190 (2014), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
  6. 박철우, "국어 분열문의 통사 구조", 한말연구, (22), pp.76~96 (2008), 한말연구학회
  7. 손근원, "계사구문에 대한 비수문, 비분열 접근법", 생성문법연구, 10(2), pp.267~294 (2000)
  8. 손근원, "분열구문에서의 후치사 생략과 회복가능성 원리", 언어학, 8(3), pp.139~153 (2000)
  9. 이남근, "한국어 분열구문의 유형과 특성: HPSG 분석", 언어연구, 25(1), pp.25~38 (2008), 언어정보연구소
  10. 이정식, "순행, 역행 상승: 국어 ‘것’ 내부분열문", 언어연구, 25(4), pp.757~776 (2010), 한국현대언어학회
  11. 임규홍, "국어 분열문에 관한 연구", 어문학, 48, pp.155~175 (1986)
  12. 최기용, "한국어 균열 구문의 ‘것’: 빈 NP 채우기로서의 ‘것’", 생성문법연구, 21(1), pp.21~47 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
  13. 홍용철, "한국어의 격조사 탈락과 격조사 부재", 프랑스어문교육, 18(18), pp.295~314 (2004), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
  14. 홍용철, "두 가지 유형의 소위 한국어 동격 구문", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.281~306 (2014), 한국생성문법학회
  15. Hee-Don Ahn, "Layered Nominal Structures: Implications for Caseless Nominals", 언어, 31(2), pp.165~185 (2006), 한국언어학회
  16. Heggie, Lorie, "The Syntax of Copular Constructions", 박사, pp.1998
  17. Hiraiwa, Ken, "Missing links: Cleft, sluicing and ‘no da’ construction in Japanese", The proceedings of humit 2001, pp.35~54 (2001), MITWPL
  18. Jhang, Sea-Eun, "Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives" (1994), Hankwuk Publishers
  19. 조정민, "Sluicing? It's Just One of Copular Constructions", 언어학, 13(2), pp.143~167 (2005), 대한언어학회
  20. Kang, Bosook, "Some peculiarities of Korean Kes cleft constructions", Studia Linguistica, 60(3), pp.251~281 (2006)
  21. 김지은, "What Sluicing Comes from in Korean is Pseudo-cleft", 언어, 37(1), pp.69~106 (2012), 한국언어학회
  22. Kim, Ji-yung, "WCCFL 26" (2008)
  23. 김종복, "Some Remarks on Korean Nominalizer kes and Information Structure", 생성문법연구, 17(4), pp.479~494 (2007), 한국생성문법학회
  24. 김종복, "Interactions between (pseudo-) cleft and copular constructions in Korean", 언어연구, 30(1), pp.93~139 (2013), 언어정보연구소
  25. Kim, Kwang-sup, "Anti-connectivity", 박사, pp.1998
  26. Lasnik, Howard, "On Repair bu Ellipsis", Proceedings of the 2002 LSK International Summer Conference (2002)
  27. Marantz, Alec, "On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Liguistic Inquiry Monographs" (1984), MIT Press
  28. Mikkelson, Line, "Copular Clauses: Specificational, Predicational and Equation" (2005), Benjamin
  29. Moro, Adrea, "The Raising of the Predicates" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  30. Park,Myung-Kwan, "Subject-less Clefts in Korean : Towards a Deletion Analysis", 어학연구, 37(4) (2001), 언어교육원
  31. 박명관, "On Postposition Pied Piping and Stranding in Subjectless Cleft Constructions of Korean", 현대문법연구, 57(57), pp.43~68 (2009), 현대문법학회
  32. 박명관, "On the Syntax of Multiple Fragments in Korean", 현대문법연구, (80), pp.1~22 (2014), 현대문법학회[DOI]
  33. 박명관, "Copula and ‘Sluicing' Constructions in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese", 언어, 39(3), pp.427~452 (2014), 한국언어학회
  34. 박명관, "The syntax of ‘sluicing’", ‘fragmenting’ in Korean: Evidence from the copula -i- ‘be’, 2014, pp.31(1), 103~133[DOI]
  35. Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope and Economy", 박사, pp.1995
  36. Sohn, Keun-Won, "Kes-clefts, Connectedness Effects, and the Implications Thereof", Studies in Generative Grammar, 14, pp.561~571 (2001)
  37. 손근원, "Kes-clefts, Connectedness Effects, and the Implications Thereof", 생성문법연구, 14(4), pp.561~571 (2004), 한국생성문법학회
  38. 윤항진, "Different Types of Kes Constructions in Korean", 생성문법연구, 22(3), pp.557~577 (2012), 한국생성문법학회
  39. Yoon, James Hye Suk, "What the Korean copular reveals about the interaction of morphology and syntax", Keynote paper presented at the 24th Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference (2002), University of California
  40. Yoon, James Hye Suk, "Clitic and Affix Combinations: Theoretical Perspectives", pp.239~283 (2005), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)