본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Property of the Jussive Head in Korean Jussives

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper aims to examine (i) if Agree for the identification of jussive subjects in Pak, Portner and Zanuttini (2008a,b) (PPZ) and Zanuttini,Pak, and Portner (2011) (ZPP) is properly formulated (ii) how the subjects of jussive complements in Korean are identified. It is argued that the precise formulation of Agree has not been applied to the analysis of jussives in PPZ, but the agreement relation in ZPP is better formulated fitting the original Agree operation. It is proposed that whereas root jussives may have the Jussive head with person features,embedded jussives may have the Jussive head without person features as the T head does not have phi-features in non-finite clauses. The embedded Jussive head with the fixed person feature value leads PPZ to assume the reference shifting mechanism by which the process to identify the subjects of jussive complements is complicated: valuation by Agree and then reference shifting. It is argued that without person features on the embedded Jussive head, the movement theory of control (MTC) is able to identify the subjects of jussive complements without recourse to the reference shifting mechanism.

Abstract

This paper aims to examine (i) if Agree for the identification of jussive subjects in Pak, Portner and Zanuttini (2008a,b) (PPZ) and Zanuttini,Pak, and Portner (2011) (ZPP) is properly formulated (ii) how the subjects of jussive complements in Korean are identified. It is argued that the precise formulation of Agree has not been applied to the analysis of jussives in PPZ, but the agreement relation in ZPP is better formulated fitting the original Agree operation. It is proposed that whereas root jussives may have the Jussive head with person features,embedded jussives may have the Jussive head without person features as the T head does not have phi-features in non-finite clauses. The embedded Jussive head with the fixed person feature value leads PPZ to assume the reference shifting mechanism by which the process to identify the subjects of jussive complements is complicated: valuation by Agree and then reference shifting. It is argued that without person features on the embedded Jussive head, the movement theory of control (MTC) is able to identify the subjects of jussive complements without recourse to the reference shifting mechanism.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Baker, Mark, "The syntax of agreement and concord" (2008), Cambridge University press
  2. Boeckx, Cedric, "Control as Movement" (2010), Cambridge University Press
  3. Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  4. Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Step by step", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  5. Chomsky, Noam, "Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT
  6. Chomsky, Noam, "On phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory", pp.133~176 (2008), MIT Press
  7. Fujii, Tomohiro, "Some theoretical issues in Japanese control", 박사, pp.2006
  8. Gamerschlag, Thomas, "Semantic and structural aspects of complement control in Korean. In Studies in complement control: Zas Papers in Linguistics 47", pp.81~123 (2007)
  9. Han, Chung-hye, "The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives : Mood and Force in Universal Grammar", 박사, pp.1998
  10. Han, Chung-hye, "The contribution of mood and force in the interpretation of imperatives", NELS, 29 (1999)
  11. Han, Chung-hye, "The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar" (2000), Garland Publishing, Inc
  12. Hornstein, Norbert, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
  13. Hornstein, Norbert, "On control. In Minimalist syntax", pp.6~81 (2003), Blackwell
  14. Kang, Young-Se, "Korean syntax and universal grammar", 박사, pp.1986
  15. Kaplan, David, "Afterthoughts. In Themes from Kaplan" (1989), Oxford University Press
  16. Kim, Young-Joo, "The syntax and semantics of Korean Case: The interaction between lexical and syntactic levels of representation", 박사, pp.1990
  17. Kratzer, Angelika, "Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.187~237 (2009)
  18. 이혜란, "A Movement Analysis of Control Construction in Korean", 생성문법연구, 21(4), pp.639~669 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
  19. 이만기, "Phase-based Binding Conditions with special reference to Control and Obviation in Spanish and Korean", 생성문법연구, 22(1), pp.23~48 (2012), 한국생성문법학회
  20. Madigan, Sean, "Split control is obligatory control: evidence from Korean", Linguistic Inquiry, 39, pp.493~502 (2008)
  21. Madigan. Sean, "Control Constructions in Korean", 박사, pp.2008
  22. Mauck, Simon, "Imperative subjects: A cross-linguistic perspective" (2004), Georgetown University
  23. Pak, Miok, "Agreement of sentence final particles in jussive clauses", Paper presented at the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL) (2004), University of Southern California
  24. Pak, Miok, "Jussive clauses and agreement of sentence final particles in Korean", Japanese, 2006, pp.14, 295~306[DOI]
  25. Pak, Miok, "What Korean promissives tell us about jussive clause types" (2005), Colloque de syntaxe et sémantique à Paris
  26. Pak, Miok, "Agreement and the subjects of jussive clauses in Korean. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 37, In Agreement and the subjects of jussive clauses in Korean", Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, pp.37~ (2007), GLSA
  27. Pak, Miok, "Agreement and the subjects of jussive clauses in Korean", Proceedings of NELS, 37, pp.127~138, GLSA
  28. Pak, Miok, "Agreement in promissive, imperative, and exhortative clauses", Korean Linguistics, 14, pp.157~175 (2008)
  29. 박홍근, "Control Constructions in Korean Revisited", 생성문법연구, 22(1), pp.1~22 (2012), 한국생성문법학회
  30. Park, Jong Un., "Clause structure and null subjects: Referential dependencies in Korean", 박사, pp.2011
  31. Palmer, Frank, "Mood and modality" (1986), Cambridge University Press
  32. Pesetsky, David, "The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture", pp.262~294 (2007), John Benjamins
  33. Platzack, Christer, "On the subject of imperatives: A minimalist account of the imperative clause", The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 1, pp.177~224 (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  34. Polinsky, Maria, "Expanding the scope of control and raising", Syntax, 9, pp.171~192 (2006)
  35. Sadock, Jerald M., "Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description", pp.155~196 (1985), Cambridge University Press
  36. Schlenker, Philippe, "A plea for monsters", Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, pp.29~120 (2003)
  37. 윤항진, "Sentential Particles and Null Subjects in Korean", 현대문법연구, (61), pp.51~75 (2010), 현대문법학회
  38. Zanuttini, Raffaella, "Encoding the addressee in the syntax: evidence from English imperative subjects", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, pp.185~218 (2008)
  39. Zanuttini, Raffaella, "A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects", To appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)