A Movement Analysis of Control Construction in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to unify obligatory control constructions in Korean as A-movement. The so-called infinitival control and finite control are uniformly analyzed under A-movement. It is observed that finite control complements in Hebrew 3rd person subjunctives and Brazilian Portuguese are transparent with regard to A-movement since complement clauses are deficient in one of the two feature sets, [T±,phi±] (Boeckx, Hornstein and Nunes 2010). Likewise, it is claimed that not only infinitival but finite control complements in Korean are transparent to A-movement due to the deficiency of the feature sets. The unusual transparency of Korean raising complements with free alternation of tense markers is also claimed to be uniformly accounted for under A-movement based on the proposed feature combination. Consequently, this paper argues, following the movement theory of control, that (i) the control module disappears, simplifying the grammar,(ii) the empty category in control complement is identified as a copy left after movement, and (iii) the interpretation of the empty category is naturally obtained as a result of movement.
Abstract
This paper aims to unify obligatory control constructions in Korean as A-movement. The so-called infinitival control and finite control are uniformly analyzed under A-movement. It is observed that finite control complements in Hebrew 3rd person subjunctives and Brazilian Portuguese are transparent with regard to A-movement since complement clauses are deficient in one of the two feature sets, [T±,phi±] (Boeckx, Hornstein and Nunes 2010). Likewise, it is claimed that not only infinitival but finite control complements in Korean are transparent to A-movement due to the deficiency of the feature sets. The unusual transparency of Korean raising complements with free alternation of tense markers is also claimed to be uniformly accounted for under A-movement based on the proposed feature combination. Consequently, this paper argues, following the movement theory of control, that (i) the control module disappears, simplifying the grammar,(ii) the empty category in control complement is identified as a copy left after movement, and (iii) the interpretation of the empty category is naturally obtained as a result of movement.
참고문헌 (47)
- Boeckx,Cedric, "Islands and chains" (2003), John Benjamins
- Boeckx, Cedric, "Control as Movement" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Boeckx,Cedric, "Bare syntax" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky,Carol, "The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10" (1969), MIT Press
- Chomsky,Noam, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky,Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky,Noam, "Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT
- Chomsky,Noam, "On phases", 석사, pp.2005
- Chomsky,Noam, "Approaching UG from below", 석사, pp.2006
- Chomsky, Noam, "The theory of principle and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research", pp.506~569 (1993), Mouton de Gruyter
- Chung,Sandra, "Case marking and grammatical relations in Polynesian" (1978), University of Texas press
- Culicover, Peter W, "Control is not movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.493~511 (2001)
- Ferreira,Marcelo, "Null subjects and finite control in Brazilian Portuguese. In Minimalist essays on Brazilian Portuguese syntax", pp.17~49 (2009), John Benjamins
- Fujii,Tomohiro, "Some theoretical issues in Japanese control", 박사, pp.2006
- Gamerschlag,Thomas, "Semantic and structural aspects of complement control in Korean. In Studies in complement control: Zas Papers in Linguistics 47", pp.81~123 (2007)
- Haddad,Youssef, "Control in Assamese. Questionnaire, project "Variation in Control Structures"", ~ (2006)
- Han,Chung Hye, "The structure and interpretation of imperatives: Mood and force in universal grammar" (2000), Garland
- Hornstein,Norbert, "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein,Norbert, "On control. In Minimalist syntax", pp.6~81 (2003), Blackwell
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Control as movement: Across languages and constructions. In Movement theory of control", pp.1~44 (2010), John Benjamins
- Kim,Young-Joo, "The syntax and semantics of Korean Case: The interaction between lexical and syntactic levels of representation", 박사, pp.1990
- 김영선, "Merge Theory of Control and Implicit Argument Control", 생성문법연구, 13(2), pp.285~303 (2003), 한국생성문법학회
- Ko,Heejeong, "Constraining scrambling: Cyclic linearization and subject movement", WCCFL 23 Proceedings (2004)
- Kwon, Nayoung, "Object control in Korean: A backward control impostor. In Movement theory of control", pp.299~328 (2010), John Benjamins
- Kwon, Nayoung, "Object control in Korean: structure and processing", Proceedings of Japanese Korean Linguistics 15 (2006), CSLI Publications
- Landau,Idan, "Elements of control", 박사, pp.1999
- Landau,Idan, "The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, pp.811~877 (2004)
- Lasnik, Howard, "On the subject of infinitives", CSL, 27, pp.324~343 (1991), University of Chicago
- Lee,Felicia, "Anaphoric R-expressions as bound variables", Syntax, 6, pp.84~114 (2003)
- 이혜란, "A Raising-to-Object Analysis of Korean ECM Constructions", 생성문법연구, 17(3), pp.361~396 (2007), 한국생성문법학회
- Madigan.Sean, "Control Constructions in Korean", 박사, pp.2008
- Madigan.Sean, "Obligatory split control into exhortative complements in Korean", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.493~502 (2008)
- Martin,Roger, "A minimalist theory of control", 박사, pp.1996
- Monahan,Philip, "Backward object control in Korean", WCCFL, 22, pp.101~114 (2003)
- Nunes,Jairo, "Inherent Case as a licensing condition for A-movement: the case of hyper-raising constructions in Brazilian Portuguese", Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 7, pp.83~108 (2008)
- O'Neil, John, "Out of control", Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (1995), University of Massachusetts
- Park,Miok, "Agreement of sentence final particles in jussive clauses", Paper presented at the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL) (2004), University of Southern California
- Pak,Miok, "Jussive clauses and agreement of sentence final particles in Korean", Japanese, 2006, pp.14, 295~306[DOI]
- Pak, Miok, "Agreement in promissive, imperative, and exhortative clauses", Korean Linguistics, 14, pp.157~175 (2008)
- Park,Jong Un, "Clause structure and null subjects: Referential dependencies in Korean", 박사, pp.2011
- Pesetsky, David, "The tense, Case and nature of syntactic categories", 석사, pp.2002
- Polinsky, Maria, "Expanding the scope of control and raising", Syntax, 9, pp.171~192 (2006)
- Maria Polinsky, "Object control in Korean: How many constructions?", 어학연구, 43(1), pp.1~33 (2007), 언어교육원
- Rosenbaum,Peter S, "The grammar of English sentential complementation. In Readings in English transformational grammar", pp.20~29 (1967), Ginn
- Stowell,Tim, "The tense of infinitives", Linguistic Inquiry, 13, pp.561~570 (1982)
- Tanaka, Hidekasu, "Raising to object out of CP", Linguistic Inquiry, 33, pp.637~652 (2002)
- Urushibara,Saeko, "Ey", Ekey: A postposition or a Case marker, 1991, pp.4, 421~431[DOI]