Remarks on the Unified Approach to Obligatory Control and Apparently Similar Constructions
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to make some critical remarks on the unified approach to obligatory control (OC) and a couple of other apparently similar constructions in Korean. OC has received various accounts in the generative literature. Arguing against the previous approaches such as the binding-theoretic approach (Chomsky (1981)) and null Case approach (e.g., Chomsky and Lasnik (1993)), some studies have proposed to reduce OC dependencies into A-chain relations, getting rid of the control module (e.g., Hornstein (1999, 2001, 2003)). This line of analysis, dubbed the 'Movement Theory of Control' (MTC), has expanded their empirical coverage, arguing that OC into both infinitival and finite complements can be explained under the movement view (e.g., Boeckx et al. (2010)). Their claim has been extended by H. Lee (2011) to various Korean data,which range from OC into infinitival and jussive complements to raising constructions. Furthermore, she examines the possibility of applying the movement view to long-distance scrambling (LDS). This paper shows that although the MTC has some advantages in analyzing Korean infinitival OC constructions, the attempt to unify all the aforementioned phenomena under the movement view would run into empirical and theoretical problems. It is rather concluded that at least OC into jussive complements and LDS should be dealt with in different ways.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to make some critical remarks on the unified approach to obligatory control (OC) and a couple of other apparently similar constructions in Korean. OC has received various accounts in the generative literature. Arguing against the previous approaches such as the binding-theoretic approach (Chomsky (1981)) and null Case approach (e.g., Chomsky and Lasnik (1993)), some studies have proposed to reduce OC dependencies into A-chain relations, getting rid of the control module (e.g., Hornstein (1999, 2001, 2003)). This line of analysis, dubbed the 'Movement Theory of Control' (MTC), has expanded their empirical coverage, arguing that OC into both infinitival and finite complements can be explained under the movement view (e.g., Boeckx et al. (2010)). Their claim has been extended by H. Lee (2011) to various Korean data,which range from OC into infinitival and jussive complements to raising constructions. Furthermore, she examines the possibility of applying the movement view to long-distance scrambling (LDS). This paper shows that although the MTC has some advantages in analyzing Korean infinitival OC constructions, the attempt to unify all the aforementioned phenomena under the movement view would run into empirical and theoretical problems. It is rather concluded that at least OC into jussive complements and LDS should be dealt with in different ways.
참고문헌 (47)
- Baker, Mark, "The Syntax of Agreement and Concord" (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Boeckx, Cedric, "Control as Movement" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Borer, Hagit, "Anaphoric AGR, In The Null Subject Parameter", pp.69~109 (1989), Kluwer
- Choe, Hyon-Sook, "On (Backward) Object Control in Korean, In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XI", pp.373~386 (2006)
- Choi, Hye-Won, "Optimizing Structure in Context: Scrambling and Information Structure", 박사, pp.1996
- Chomsky, Noam, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Minimalist Inquires: the Framework, In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~156 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "The Theory of Principles and Parameters, In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research", pp.506~569 (1993), Mouton de Gruyter
- Crnič, Luka, "Embedding Imperatives", To appear in Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of North East Linguistic Society (2009)
- Ferreira, Marcelo, "Null Subjects and Finite Control in Brazilian Portuguese, In Minimalist Essays on Brazilian Portuguese Syntax", pp.17~49 (2009), John Benjamins
- Fujii, Tomohiro, "Some Theoretical Issues in Japanese Control", 박사, pp.2006
- Gamerschlag, Thomas, "Semantic and Structural Aspects of Complement Control in Korean", ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 47, pp.61~123 (2007)
- Han, Chung Hye, "The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar" (2000), Garland
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Movement and Control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal" (2001), Blackwell Publishers
- Hornstein, Norbert, "On Control. In Minimalist Syntax", pp.6~81 (2003), Blackwell Publishers
- Johnston, Jason C., "Some Problems with a Lowering Account of Scrambling", Linguistic Inquiry, 32(4), pp.727~732 (2001)
- 김랑혜윤, "Scrambling and Minimalist Program", 생성문법연구, 13(1), pp.3~19 (2003), 한국생성문법학회
- Ko, Heejeong, "Constraining Scrambling: Cyclic Linearization and Subject Movement", WCCFL 23 Proceedings (2004)
- Kwon, Nayoung, "Object Control in Korean: Structure and Processing", Japanese, 2006, pp.15, ~[DOI]
- Landau, Idan, "Elements of Control", 박사, pp.1999
- Landau, Idan, "The Scale of Finiteness and the Calculus of Control", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, pp.811~877 (2004)
- 이혜란, "Left Periphery in Korean: Topicalization, Focalization, and Scrambling", 생성문법연구, 18(1), pp.137~171 (2008), 한국생성문법학회
- 이혜란, "A Movement Analysis of Control Construction in Korean", 생성문법연구, 21(4), pp.639~669 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
- Madigan. Sean, "Control Constructions in Korean", 박사, pp.2008
- Martin, Roger., "A Minimalist Theory of Control", 박사, pp.1996
- Monahan, Philip, "Backward Object Control in Korean", WCCFL 22 Proceedings, pp.356~369 (2003), Cascadilla Press.
- Nunes, Jairo, "Inherent Case as a Licensing Condition for A-movement: the Case of Hyper-raising Constructions in Brazilian Portuguese", Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 7, pp.83~108 (2008)
- O'Neil, John, "Means of Control: Deriving the Properties of PRO in the Minimalist Program", 박사, pp.1996
- Pak, Miok, "Jussive Clauses and Agreement of Sentence Final Particles in Korean", Japanese, 2006, pp.14, 295~306[DOI]
- Palmer, Frank, "Mood and Modality" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- 박종언, "Jussive Particles and Obligatory Control in Korean", 생성문법연구, 19(3), pp.393~421 (2009), 한국생성문법학회
- Park, Jong Un, "Agreement at the Syntax-Discourse Interface and Control Effects in Korean", Poster presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (2011)
- 박종언, "Chain Reduction and Object Control into Infinitival Complements in Korean", 생성문법연구, 21(2), pp.355~387 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
- Park, Jong Un, "Clause Structure and Null Subjects: Referential Dependencies in Korean", 박사, pp.2011
- Platzack, Christer, "On the Subject of Imperative Clause", The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 1, pp.177~224 (1998)
- Polinsky, Maria, "Long-distance Agreement and Topic in Tsez", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19, pp.583~646 (2002)
- Polinsky, Maria, "Expanding the Scope of Control and Raising", Syntax, 9, pp.171~192 (2006)
- Portner, Paul, "The Semantics of Imperatives within a Theory of Clause Types", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 14 (2004), CLC Publications
- Portner, Paul, "The Semantics of Mood, Complementation, and Conversational Force", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.351~383 (2007)
- Rosenbaum, Peter S., "The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions" (1967), MIT Press
- Ross, John J., "Constraints on Variables in Syntax", 박사, pp.1967
- Embedded Imperatives in Slovenian, "Rus, Dominik", Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 153~183, pp.Volume IV (2005)
- Saito, Mamoru, "Long Distance Scrambling in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.69~119 (1992)
- Williams, Edwin, "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.203~238 (1980)
- Zanuttini, Raffaella, "A Syntactic Analysis of Interpretive Restrictions on Imperative, Promissive and Exhortative Subjects", To appear in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (2011)