Agreement of a Point-of-Viewer and a Jussive Subject
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper investigates the person feature restrictions on Jussive subjects. First, we present three cases of Jussive constructions: Typical-Jussives, Indirect Order, and Non-Typical Exhortatives. Traditionally, previous works in the literature have been concerned with the former two, where a Jussive subject and a Jussive head are totally identical or completely different from each other. However, we introduce a new case, Non-Typical Exhortatives, in which person features of an Exhortativeparticle are partially manifested by a Jussive subject. We try to proposea unified approach using Agree, based on the recent influential analysisof Zanuttini, Pak, and Portner (2012, NLLT), but show that a simpleAgree analysis brings about an under-generation problem. We then demonstrate that information of a Jussive head is passed on to a Jussivesubject via a Point-of-Viewer (POV) feature which is related to aconversational participant. Additionally, we propose that first andsecond person POV features on an Exhortative head can behave individually when they participate in Agreeing with a Jussive subject:subset probing. With this, the three constructions converge into two maingroups again: Agree vs. Non-Agree. Our proposal suggests that Obligatory Control in embedded Jussives is not derived by Agree. Additionally, it gives an explanation for a wide variety of Exhortative meanings.
Abstract
This paper investigates the person feature restrictions on Jussive subjects. First, we present three cases of Jussive constructions: Typical-Jussives, Indirect Order, and Non-Typical Exhortatives. Traditionally, previous works in the literature have been concerned with the former two, where a Jussive subject and a Jussive head are totally identical or completely different from each other. However, we introduce a new case, Non-Typical Exhortatives, in which person features of an Exhortativeparticle are partially manifested by a Jussive subject. We try to proposea unified approach using Agree, based on the recent influential analysisof Zanuttini, Pak, and Portner (2012, NLLT), but show that a simpleAgree analysis brings about an under-generation problem. We then demonstrate that information of a Jussive head is passed on to a Jussivesubject via a Point-of-Viewer (POV) feature which is related to aconversational participant. Additionally, we propose that first andsecond person POV features on an Exhortative head can behave individually when they participate in Agreeing with a Jussive subject:subset probing. With this, the three constructions converge into two maingroups again: Agree vs. Non-Agree. Our proposal suggests that Obligatory Control in embedded Jussives is not derived by Agree. Additionally, it gives an explanation for a wide variety of Exhortative meanings.
참고문헌 (47)
- Amritavalli, Raghavachari, "Separating tense and finiteness: anchoring in Dravidian", NLLT, 32(1), pp.283~306 (2014)
- Anand, Pranav, "De De Se", 박사, pp.2006
- Baker, Mark Carrington, "The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics" (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Barrie, Michael, "Korean Jussives and point of view", Poster presented at Glow in Asia X (2014)
- Benincà, Paola, "Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social", pp.265~299 (2005), John Benjamins
- Bennis, Hans, "Arguments and Agreement", pp.101~123 (2006), Oxford University Press
- Bennis, Hans, "Featuring the subject in Dutch imperatives. In Imperative Clauses in Generative Grammar: Studies Offered to Frits Beukema", Wim van der Wurff. Linguistik Aktuell, 2007, pp.103, 113~134[DOI]
- Beukema, Frits, "A government-binding perspective on the imperative in English", Journal of Linguistics, 25(2), pp.417~436 (1989)
- Tense and Point of View, "Temps et Point de Vue", pp.2003, Bianchi, Valentina
- Cho, Sungeun, "Three Forms of Case Agreement in Korean", 박사, pp.2000
- Collins, Peter, "Let-imperatives in English", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(2), pp.299~319 (2004)
- Downing, Bruce T., "Vocatives and third-person imperatives in English", Papers in Linguistics, 1(3), pp.570~592 (1969)
- Han, Chung-Hye, "The Syntax and Semantics of Imperatives and Related Constructions", 박사, pp.1998
- Heim, Irene, "Phi Theory: Phi-Features across Modules and Interfaces", pp.35~56 (2008), Oxford University Press
- Hoe, Semoon, "A study on Obligatory Control Structures in Korean (written in Korean)", 박사, pp.2014
- Hoe, Semoon. to appear, "On the 1st", 2nd person restriction of Korean anaphor caki and its implications, ~
- Jensen, Britta, "Syntax and semantics of imperative subjects", Nordlyd, 31(1), pp.150~164 (2003)
- Kaufmann, Magdalena, "Interpreting Imperatives" (2012), Springer Science & Business Media
- Kratzer, Angelika, "Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns", LI, 40(2), pp.187~237 (2009)
- Krug, Manfred, "Adhortative let’s: Negation and grammaticalization", Hand-out presented at The second international conference on Modality in English (2004)
- Landau, Idan, "Elements of Control" (2000), Kluwer Academic
- Landau, Idan, "The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control", NLLT, 22(4), pp.811~877 (2004)
- Landau, Idan, "A Two-Tiered Theory of Control", 석사, pp.2013
- 이혜란, "Property of the Jussive Head in Korean Jussives", 생성문법연구, 22(2), pp.263~302 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Lee, Kum Young, "Finite Control in Korean", 박사, pp.2009
- Madigan, Sean William, "Control Constructions in Korean", 박사, pp.2008
- Asymmetry in anaphoric dependencies: A cross-linguistic study of inclusive reference, "Madigan, Sean", University of Pennsylvania, ~, pp.University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 13 (2007)
- Mastop, Rochus Jacobus, "What Can You Do? Imperative Mood in Semantic Theory", 박사, pp.2005
- Pak, Miok, "Agreement and the subjects of jussive clauses in Korean", Proceedings of NELS 37, pp.127~138 (2008)
- Park, Jong Un, "Clause structure and null subjects: Referential dependencies in Korean", 박사, pp.2011
- Platzack, Christer, "On the subject of imperatives. A minimalist account of the imperative pronoun and negated imperatives", Arbeitsberichte Sprache und Pragmatik, 34, pp.26~67 (1994)
- Platzack, Christer, "On the subject of imperatives: A minimalist account of the imperative clause", The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 1(3), pp.177~224 (1998)
- Poletto, Cecilia, "The Syntax of Italian Dialects", pp.175~206 (2003), Oxford University Press
- Portner, Paul, "Imperatives and modals", NALS, 15(4), pp.351~383 (2007)
- Potsdam, Eric, "Syntactic Issues in the English Imperative" (1998), Garland Publishing, Inc
- Rupp, Laura Marie, "Aspects of the Syntax of English Imperatives", 박사, pp.1999
- Schlenker, Philippe, "A plea for monsters", Linguistics and Philosophy, 26(1), pp.29~120 (2003)
- Schmerling, Susan, "Papers from the parasession on Nondeclaratives", pp.93~106 (1982), Chicago Linguistic Society
- Seo, Saetbyol, "Agreement of a point-of-viewer and a jussive subject", Proceedings of SICOGG 16, pp.383~402 (2014)
- Sudo, Yasutada, "On the Semantics of Phi Features on Pronouns", 박사, pp.2012
- Sundaresan, Sandhya, "Making sense of silence: Finiteness and the (OC) PRO vs. pro distinction Commentary on Kissock (2013)", NLLT, 32(1), pp.59~85 (2014)
- Watanabe, Akira, "The genesis of negative concord: Syntax and morphology of negative doubling", LI, 35(4), pp.559~612 (2004)
- Yang, Dong-Whee, "On the integrity of Control theory", Proceedings of NELS 15, pp.389~408 (1985), GLSA
- Youn, Suk-min, "Theyksuthuenehakchongse 4 ‘A Series of Text Linguistics 4’" (2000), Cipmwuntang
- Zanuttini, Raffaella, "Encoding the addressee in the syntax", NLLT, 26(1), pp.185~218 (2008)
- Zanuttini, Raffaella, "A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects", NLLT, 30(4), pp.1231~1274 (2012)
- Zanuttini, Raffaella, "Speech style in root and embedded imperatives", A handout presented at Workshop on Imperatives, Embeddability, and Politeness (2013)
