A Raising Analysis of the Relative Head in Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper I argue for the head raising hypothesis of relative clause in Korean. I first claim that there are relative operators in Korean, which are relative temporal affixes. Then, I argue against the approaches of non-movement and OP-movement to Korean relative clauses. Next, I present idiom chunks, reconstruction effects, lower reading, and internally-headed relative clauses as the supporting evidence for the raising analysis. Finally I investigate how the relative head is raised in Korean. While doing so, I suggest 1) that the complex NP containing a relative clause in Korean is DP, not NP, 2) that Korean relative clause is IP/TP, not CP, and 3) that the complement of Det in Korean is the relative clause, not the relative head as in English. I propose that the relativized NP which is [+rel] moves to SpecTP to satisfy Spec-head agreement with the relative operator T, which is [+rel]. I claim that this movement is A-movement, the adjoined position of SpecTP being an A-position. I present the unavailability of lower reading in Korean as a consequence of this claim. I suggest that after this movement the relative clause TP moves to SpecDP, leaving the relativized NP behind to be a relative head.
Abstract
In this paper I argue for the head raising hypothesis of relative clause in Korean. I first claim that there are relative operators in Korean, which are relative temporal affixes. Then, I argue against the approaches of non-movement and OP-movement to Korean relative clauses. Next, I present idiom chunks, reconstruction effects, lower reading, and internally-headed relative clauses as the supporting evidence for the raising analysis. Finally I investigate how the relative head is raised in Korean. While doing so, I suggest 1) that the complex NP containing a relative clause in Korean is DP, not NP, 2) that Korean relative clause is IP/TP, not CP, and 3) that the complement of Det in Korean is the relative clause, not the relative head as in English. I propose that the relativized NP which is [+rel] moves to SpecTP to satisfy Spec-head agreement with the relative operator T, which is [+rel]. I claim that this movement is A-movement, the adjoined position of SpecTP being an A-position. I present the unavailability of lower reading in Korean as a consequence of this claim. I suggest that after this movement the relative clause TP moves to SpecDP, leaving the relativized NP behind to be a relative head.
참고문헌 (65)
- Bhatt, R., "The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification", Natural Language Semantics, 10, pp.43~90 (2002)
- Bianchi, V., "Consequences of antisymmetry for the syntax of headed relative clauses", 박사, pp.1995
- Bianchi, V., "Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed relative clauses" (1999), Mouton de Gruyter
- Bianchi, V., "The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley", Linguistic Inquiry, 31, pp.123~140 (2000)
- Bianchi, V., "Headed relative clauses in generative syntax", Glot International, 6(8), pp.1~13 (2002)
- Borsley, R., "Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.629~647 (1997)
- Borsley, R., "More on the raising analysis of relative clauses", 석사, pp.2001
- Brame, M., "A new analysis of the relative clause : Evidence for an interpretive theory" (1968), MIT
- Carson, G., "Amount relatives", Language, 53, pp.520~542 (1977)
- Cho, J. -H., "Scrambling in Korean: crossover, reconstruction and binding theory", 박사, pp.1994
- Cho, J.-H., "Scrambling without syntactic movement", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10, pp.151~180 (2000)
- Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "On wh-movement. In Formal syntax", pp.71~132 (1977), Academic Press
- Chomsky, N., "Knowledge of language : Its nature, origin and use" (1986), Praeger
- Choo, M., "A unified account of null pronouns in Korean", 박사, pp.1994
- 정대호, "On the Structure of the So-called Head Internal Relatives", Kyung Hee Univesity, 11, pp.393~402 (1996)
- 정대호, "Why is HOW in Korean Insensitive to Islands?: A Revised Nominal Analysis", 현대문법연구, 39(39), pp.115~131 (2005), 현대문법학회
- 김종복, "Differences between Externally and Internally Headed Relative Clauses", pp.43~65 (2003)
- Davis, D., "Evidence against movement in Japanese relative clauses", Handout from ECO5 2006 (2006), MIT
- Donati, C., "Relabeling heads: A unified account for relativization structures", Linguistic Inquiry, 42, pp.519~560 (2011)
- Fukui, N., "Nominal structure: An extension of the symmetry principle. In The derivation of VO and OV", pp.219~254 (2000), Benjamins
- Han, C.-H., "Are there "double relative clauses" in Korean?", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.179~217 (2004)
- Heim, I., "E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora", Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, pp.137~177 (1990)
- Han, J. -I., "Syntactic movement analysis of Korean relativization", Language Research, 28, pp.335~357 (1992)
- Hoji, H., "Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese", 박사, pp.1985
- Jackendoff, R., "X'-syntax : A study of phrase structure" (1977), The MIT Press
- 조미정, "The Structure of Relative Clauses in Korean", 생성문법연구, 12(1), pp.107~138 (2002), 한국생성문법학회
- 조미정, "The Morphosyntax of Prenominal Relative Clauses in Korean", 생성문법연구, 21(4), pp.563~585 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
- Kang, S. -H., "On the adjectives in Korean", Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, pp.153~169 (2005)
- Kang, Y. -S., "Korean syntax and universal grammar", 박사, pp.1986
- Kayne, R., "The antisymmetry of syntax" (1994), The MIT Press
- Kim, M.-J., "Does Korean have adjectives?", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 43, pp.71~89 (2002)
- Kim, M.-J., "Internally-headed relatives in Korean and Japanese parallel direct perception complements: how and why?" (2002), UMass
- Kim, M. -J., "Event structure and the internally-headed relative clause constructions in Korean and Japanese", 박사, pp.2004
- Kim, M-J., "E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27, pp.345~377 (2009)
- Kim, Y. -K., "On the structure of English relative clauses in the feature-checking theory", English Studies, 23, pp.68~82 (1997)
- Koopman, H., "Korean (and Japanese) morphology from a syntactic perspective", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.601~633 (2005)
- Kuno, S., "The position of relative clauses and conjunctions", Linguistic Inquiry, 5, pp.117~136 (1974)
- Kwon, N. -Y., "Processing of syntactic and anaphoric gap-filler dependencies in Korean: Evidence from self-paced reading time, ERP and eye-tracking experiments", 박사, pp.2008
- Kwon, N.-Y., "Subject preference in Korean", In Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.1~14 (2006)
- Lebeaux, D., "Language acquisition and the form of grammar", 박사, pp.1988
- Lee, E. -J., "ECP and subjacency in LF and hierarchical order of wh-adjuncts", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.93~103 (1987)
- Lee, E.-J., "Similarities and differences among Korean prenominal phrases", ~
- Lees, R., "The grammar of English nominalizations" (1960), Mouton
- A' distinction : Scrambling and weak crossover in Hindi, "On the A", pp.1989, Mahajan, A.
- Murasugi, K., "Noun phrases in Japanese and English: A study in syntax, learnability and acquisition", 박사, pp.1991
- Murasugi, K., "Head-internal relative clauses as adjunct pure complex NPs. In Synchronic and diachronic approaches to language", pp.425~437 (1994), Kaitakusha
- Ross, J., "Constraints on variable in syntax", 박사, pp.1967
- Saito, M., "Long distance scrambling in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.69~118 (1992)
- Sauerland, U., "Unpronounced heads in relative clauses", 석사, pp.2001
- Sauerland, U., "Two structures for English restrictive relative clauses", ~ (2003)
- Schachter, P., "Focus and relativization", Language, 49, pp.19~46 (1973)
- Schenk, A., "The syntactic behavior of idioms. In Idioms: Structural and psychological perspectives" (1995), New Yersey
- Schmitt, C., "Some consequences of the complement analysis for relative clauses, demonstratives and the wrong adjectives. In The syntax of relative clauses", pp.309~348 (2000), Benjamins
- Sohn, H. -M., "Theme-prominence in Korean", Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.2~19 (1980)
- Smith, C., "Determiners and relative clauses in a generative grammar of English", Language, 40, pp.37~52 (1964)
- Smits, R., "The relative and cleft constructions of the Germanic and Romance languages", 박사, pp.1988
- Toribio, A., "Proper government in Spanish subject relativization", Probus, 4, pp.291~304 (1992)
- Vergnaud, J., "French relative clauses", 박사, pp.1974
- Vergnaud, J., "Dependances et niveaux de representation en syntaxe" (1985), John Benjamins
- Vries de, M., "Patterns of relative clauses", Linguistics in the Netherlands (2001)
- Vries de, M., "The syntax of relativization", 박사, pp.2002
- Yang, D. -W., "The basis of the government-binding theory" (1989), Shinasa
- Yang, H. -K., "Categories and barriers in Korean", 박사, pp.1990
- Zwart, J., "A head raising analysis of relative clauses in Dutch. In The syntax of relative clauses", pp.349~385 (2000), Benjamins