On the Ambiguity of Obligatory Control with the Tolok-clause in Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper accounts for why diverse interpretive patterns appear to be available from obligatory object control constructions subordinating the tolok-clause in Korean. As observed by a few studies in the literature, the range of readings that arises in the constructions includes not only obligatory control (OC) interpretations but also non-obligatory control (NOC) interpretations (Polinsky et al. 2007 among others), but other types of referential dependency between a controller and a controllee than mandatory coreference should not be allowed under the PRO Theory of Control (Chomsky 1981 among others). To capture those interpretive patterns, this paper claims, under the Movement Theory of Control, that not all tolok-clauses are born equal, proposing to distinguish tolok-clauses as a complement from those as an adjunct. Building on Hornstein’s (2001) insight into the interpretation of anaphors and pronouns, I further suggest that in the former context, where A-movement is allowed, referentially dependent DPs are interpreted as anaphors like reflexives or A-traces, while in the latter, where A-movement is prohibited, they are interpreted as pronouns.
Abstract
This paper accounts for why diverse interpretive patterns appear to be available from obligatory object control constructions subordinating the tolok-clause in Korean. As observed by a few studies in the literature, the range of readings that arises in the constructions includes not only obligatory control (OC) interpretations but also non-obligatory control (NOC) interpretations (Polinsky et al. 2007 among others), but other types of referential dependency between a controller and a controllee than mandatory coreference should not be allowed under the PRO Theory of Control (Chomsky 1981 among others). To capture those interpretive patterns, this paper claims, under the Movement Theory of Control, that not all tolok-clauses are born equal, proposing to distinguish tolok-clauses as a complement from those as an adjunct. Building on Hornstein’s (2001) insight into the interpretation of anaphors and pronouns, I further suggest that in the former context, where A-movement is allowed, referentially dependent DPs are interpreted as anaphors like reflexives or A-traces, while in the latter, where A-movement is prohibited, they are interpreted as pronouns.
참고문헌 (24)
- Beavers, J., "Intentionality, scalar change, and non-cumulation in Korean caused change-of-state predicates", Linguistics, 58, pp.1233~1283 (2020)
- Borer, H., "The Null Subject Parameter (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15)", pp.69~109 (1989), Kluwer
- Choe, H. -S., "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XI", pp.373~386 (2006), Harvard University Department of Linguistics
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N., "Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research", pp.506~569 (1993), Mouton de Gruyter
- Backward control in Korean and Japanese, "Cormack, A.", 355~373, pp.University College of London Working Papers in Linguistics 14 (2004)
- Fujii, T., "Some Theoretical Issues in Japanese Control", Ph.D, pp.2006
- Gamerschlag, T., "ZAS Papers in Linguistics 47", pp.61~123 (2007), Universitätsbibliothek Johann Christian Senckenberg
- Hornstein, N., "Movement and control", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.69~96 (1999)
- Hornstein, N., "Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal" (2001), Blackwell Publishers
- Kim, K., "Casuativity in Korean: Syntactic Causative, Control and Purpose", Ph.D, pp.1995
- Kim, S. -H., "Division of Labor between Grammar and Pragmatics: The Distribution and Interpretation of Anaphora", Ph.D, pp.1994
- Korean Linguistics Vol. 15, "Proceedings of Japanese", pp.2006, Kwon, N.
- Landau, I., "Elements of Control", Ph.D., pp.1999
- 이주원, "Revisiting the persuade-constructions in Korean with empirical evidence", 언어연구, 37(1), pp.29~70 (2020), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- Martin, R., "A Minimalist Theory of Control", Ph.D, pp.1996
- Monahan, P., "WCCFL 22 Proceedings", pp.356~369 (2003), Cascadilla Press
- 박홍근, "Control Constructions in Korean Revisited", 생성문법연구, 22(1), pp.1~22 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 박종언, "Chain Reduction and Object Control into Infinitival Complements in Korean", 생성문법연구, 21(2), pp.355~387 (2011), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Park, J. U., "Clause Structure and Null Subjects: Referential Dependencies in Korean", Ph.D, pp.2011
- Maria Polinsky, "Object control in Korean: How many constructions?", 어학연구, 43(1), pp.1~33 (2007), 언어교육원
- Seo, J. S., "The Korean Grammar" (1996), Hanyang University Press
- Shim, J. Y., "The tense of resultatives: The case of Korean", Proceedings of NELS, 38, pp.1~22 (2007)
- Williams, E., "Predication", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.203~238 (1980)