제시어에 대한 내포성분 이동(SubMove) 분석의 문제
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There are two incompatible analyses concerning the original position of sentence-initial non-Case-marked NPs (henceforth, NCNP), which are referred to as 'ceysie' by the traditional Korean grammar:base-generation analysis (김영희 1989, Ahn 1999, 홍용철 2004) and SubMove analysis (Ahn & Cho 2006). The former claims that NCNPs are base-generated in the sentence-initial position, while according to the latter, they are derived by SubMove, a special case of movement. SubMove analysis is essentially based on two assumptions: (i) an NCNP originates in a doubling structure whose head position is functional and occupied by an (overt/covert) pronoun resuming the NCNP; (ii) it lacks a theta role within the doubling structure, and then, always moves to the sentence-initial position to get a theta role. This paper provides three types of problematic examples related to these assumptions: examples where the stranded element resuming the NCNP is a lexical phrase,examples where the stranded element is overt and the NCNP remains in situ, and examples where the NCNP does not have any original position in the following clause. The first type is counter-examples to the doubling structure that Ahn & Cho posits for NCNPs, the second type to the obligatory movement of NCNPs, and the third type not only to the doubling structure but also to the obligatory movement. The third type also provides an argument in favor of base-generation analysis.
Abstract
There are two incompatible analyses concerning the original position of sentence-initial non-Case-marked NPs (henceforth, NCNP), which are referred to as 'ceysie' by the traditional Korean grammar:base-generation analysis (김영희 1989, Ahn 1999, 홍용철 2004) and SubMove analysis (Ahn & Cho 2006). The former claims that NCNPs are base-generated in the sentence-initial position, while according to the latter, they are derived by SubMove, a special case of movement. SubMove analysis is essentially based on two assumptions: (i) an NCNP originates in a doubling structure whose head position is functional and occupied by an (overt/covert) pronoun resuming the NCNP; (ii) it lacks a theta role within the doubling structure, and then, always moves to the sentence-initial position to get a theta role. This paper provides three types of problematic examples related to these assumptions: examples where the stranded element resuming the NCNP is a lexical phrase,examples where the stranded element is overt and the NCNP remains in situ, and examples where the NCNP does not have any original position in the following clause. The first type is counter-examples to the doubling structure that Ahn & Cho posits for NCNPs, the second type to the obligatory movement of NCNPs, and the third type not only to the doubling structure but also to the obligatory movement. The third type also provides an argument in favor of base-generation analysis.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김영희, "한국어 제시어의 문법", 주시경학보, 4, pp.114~138 (1989)
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 연희전문학교 출판부
- 홍용철, "융합이론과 격조사 분포", 생성문법연구, 4(1), pp.1~44 (1994)
- 홍용철, "한국어의 격조사 탈락과 격조사 부재", 프랑스어문교육, (18), pp.295~314 (2004), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 홍용철, "한국어의 명사 확장범주", 언어, 31(4), pp.657~684 (2006), 한국언어학회
- 홍용철, "지시사구", 프랑스어문교육, (35), pp.229~257 (2010), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- Ahn,H.-D, "Notes on case deletion In Linguistic Investigation: In honor of In-Seok Yang", pp.1~16 (1999), Hankuk Publishing Co
- Hee-Don Ahn, "Layered Nominal Structures: Implications for Caseless Nominals", 언어, 31(2), pp.165~185 (2006), 한국언어학회
- Romance clitics: Stucture and derivation In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, "Italian", pp.1999, Belletti,A
- Belletti,A, "Aspects of the Low IP Area In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures", pp.16~51 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Boecks, C, "SubMove: Towards a unified account of scrambling and D-linking", pp.241~257 (2004), Klower
- Cecchetto,C, "Doubling structures and reconstruction", Probus, 12, pp.93~126 (2000)
- Hong,Y.-T, "Théorie de l'incorporation et théorie du Cas: leurs implications sur la structure phrastique et sur la stucture du syntagme nominal en coréen", 박사, pp.1992
- Hong,Y.-T, "Hanging Topic and Non-Case-Marked NP in Korean", A paper presented at The 14th Harvard International Symposium on Korean Linguistics (2011)
- Kayne,R, "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kayne,R, "Movement and silence" (2005), Oxford University Press
- 김용하, "A Case for Ellipsis in Korean: The Non-Movement Multiple Object Construction", 생성문법연구, 16(4), pp.737~772 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- Rouveret,A, "Cliticisation et temps en portugais européen", Revue des Langues Romanes, 2, pp.337~371 (1989)
- Sportiche,D, "A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.425~449 (1998)
- Torrego,E, "On the nature of clitic doubling In Evolution and Revolution in Linguitic Theory", pp.251~275 (1995), Georgetown University Press
- Urigereka,J, "Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance", Linguistic Inquiry, 26, pp.79~123 (1995)