본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

분열문의 초점 부분에 나타난 ‘것’: 개체화 형태소

‘Kes’ in the Focusing Part of Korean Cleft Construction: An Individuation Morpheme

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Verb phrases and clauses need to be nominalized by kes when they are focused in the kes-cleft construction in Korean, even though non-nominal categories are otherwise allowed in the focus position. This paper offers a solution to this puzzle from the fact that (i) the categories that can be focused by the adverb ‘palo’ coincide with the categories that can occur in the focus-position of the kes-cleft constructions, (ii) ‘palo’-focuses and cleft-construction focuses are identificational and exhaustive, and (iii) the kes-cleft construction and all the categories focused by ‘palo’ include an individuation morpheme such as noun or ‘-seo.’ This paper proposes that the kes-nominalization of focused verb phrases or clauses follows since the exhaustivity is induced by the semantic operator EXH (Brody and Szendrıi 2010) and the operator is located in the individuation morpheme such as the noun, -seo, or kes in Korean.

Abstract

Verb phrases and clauses need to be nominalized by kes when they are focused in the kes-cleft construction in Korean, even though non-nominal categories are otherwise allowed in the focus position. This paper offers a solution to this puzzle from the fact that (i) the categories that can be focused by the adverb ‘palo’ coincide with the categories that can occur in the focus-position of the kes-cleft constructions, (ii) ‘palo’-focuses and cleft-construction focuses are identificational and exhaustive, and (iii) the kes-cleft construction and all the categories focused by ‘palo’ include an individuation morpheme such as noun or ‘-seo.’ This paper proposes that the kes-nominalization of focused verb phrases or clauses follows since the exhaustivity is induced by the semantic operator EXH (Brody and Szendrıi 2010) and the operator is located in the individuation morpheme such as the noun, -seo, or kes in Korean.

참고문헌 (76)

  1. Aarts, Bas, "English Syntax and Argumentation" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
  2. Akmajian, Adrian, "On deriving cleft sentences from pseudo-cleft sentences", Linguistic Inquiry, 1(1), pp.49~68 (1970)
  3. "Exhaustive focus is an answer" (2010)[URL]
  4. 조인정, "표현 문형 ‘-은", 는 것이다’의 담화 기능, 2011, pp.22(2), 329~349[DOI]
  5. Chomsky, Noam, "Problems of projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
  6. 최현숙, "On the Categorial Ambiguity of the Morpheme kes in Korean", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.229~264 (2007), 언어교육원
  7. Choi, Ki-Yong, "-ita uy inun cwukyek cosaita (‘i’ of ‘ita’ is nonminative case marker)", Morphology, 3, pp.101~112 (2001)
  8. 최기용, "한국어 균열 구문의 ‘것’: 빈 NP 채우기로서의 ‘것’", 생성문법연구, 21(1), pp.21~47 (2011), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  9. Chung, Jae-Hyung, "Kwukeuy eswunkwa chocemey tayhaye (On the order and the focus of Korean)", Urimal Yeonkwu, 1, pp.275~289 (1991)
  10. Chung, Chan, "Differences between externally and internally headed relative clauses", Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp.43~65 (2003), CSLI Publications
  11. Dikken, Marcel, "The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV", pp.292~409 (2006), Blackwell
  12. É. Kiss, Katalin, "Configurationality in Hungarian" (1987), Springer
  13. É. Kiss, Katalin, "Identificational focus and information focus", Language, 74, pp.245~273 (1998)
  14. Emonds, Joseph, "Root and Structure-preserving Transformations", Doctor, pp.1970
  15. Heggie, Lorie, "The Syntax of Copular Constructions", Doctor, pp.1998
  16. Heycock, Caroline, "Topic, focus, and syntactic representations", Proceedings of WCCFL, 21, pp.101~125 (2002), Cascadilla Press
  17. Higgins, Francis Roger, "The pseudo-cleft construction in English", Doctor, pp.1971
  18. 홍용철, "한국어의 명사 확장범주", 언어, 31(4), pp.657~684 (2006), 한국언어학회
  19. 홍용철, "한국어의 후치 요소와 명사 확장 범주", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.743~768 (2008), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  20. 홍용철, "“것” 분열 구문의 초점 요소에 대한 기저 생성 분석", 생성문법연구, 25(1), pp.159~180 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  21. Hwuchong, "Pwusa ‘Palo’uy Thongsa Mich Uymi Yenkwu (A Study on the Syntax and Semantics of the Adverb ‘Palo’)", MA, pp.2017
  22. Horvath, J, "FOCUS in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian" (1986), Foris
  23. Im, Dong-Hoon, "Hyentaykwuke Hyengsikmyengsa Yenkwu (A Study on Formal Noun in Modern Korean)", MA, pp.1991
  24. 1m Hong-pin, "Myengsahwauy uymithuksengey tayhaye (semantic features of Korean nominalizations)", Journal of Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.83~104 (1974)
  25. Im Hong-pin, "On ‘syntactic’ empty categories in Korean", Language Research, 21(3), pp.331~384 (1985)
  26. Im Hong-pin, "Kwukeuy Caykwisa Yenkwu (A Study on Korean Reflexives)" (1987), Sinkwu Mwunhwasa
  27. Im, Kyu-Hong, "Kwuke pwunyelmwuney kwanhan yenkwu (A Study on Korean cleft construction)", The Korean Language and Literature, 48, pp.155~175 (1986)
  28. Jhang, Sea-Eun, "Headed Nominalizations in Korean: Relative Clauses, Clefts, and Comparatives" (1994), Hankwuk Publishers
  29. 조미정, "The Correlation Between Syntactic Nominalization and the Internally Headed Relative Constructions in Korean", 생성문법연구, 13(4), pp.535~ (2003), 한국생성문법학회
  30. 전영철, "한국어의 대조초점", 언어학, (43), pp.215~237 (2005), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  31. Kang, Bosook, "Some peculiarities of Korean kes cleft constructions", Studia Linguistica, 60(3), pp.251~281 (2006)
  32. Kang, Soyoung, "Myengsakwu Pomwunkwsenguy Mwunpephwa (A Study on the Process of Grammaticalization in Korean Nouns)" (2004), Hankwuk Mwunhwasa
  33. Kim, Jeong-Sook, "ykwukinul Wihan Hankwuke Mwunpep 1 Cheykyey phyen (Korean Grammar 1 for Foreigners)" (2005), Communication Books
  34. Kim, Jong-Bok, "Copular constructions and asymmetries in the specificational pseudocleft constructions in Korean", Language and Linguistics, 17, pp.89~112 (2016)
  35. 김종복, "연설문 말뭉치에서 나타나는 ‘것’ 구문의 문법적 특징", 인지과학, 19(3), pp.257~281 (2008), 한국인지과학회[DOI]
  36. 김종복, "Some Remarks on Korean Nominalizer kes and Information Structure", 생성문법연구, 17(4), pp.479~494 (2007), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  37. 김종복, "Interactions between (pseudo-) cleft and copular constructions in Korean", 언어연구, 30(1), pp.93~139 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  38. 김건희, "연결 어미 ‘-고서, -아서", 어서, -(으)면서’에 나타나는 ‘서’의 의미기능, 2012, pp.(65), 109~155[DOI]
  39. Kim, Min-Joo., "Event Structure and the Internally-Headed Relative Clause Construction in Korean and Japanese", Doctor, pp.2004
  40. Kim, Min-Joo, "Formal linking in internally headed relatives", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.279~315 (2007)
  41. Kim, Min-Joo, "E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 27(2), pp.345~377 (2009)
  42. Kim, Nam-Kil, "The Grammar of Korean Complementation" (1984), Center for Korean Studies
  43. 김석진, "한국어 ‘것은’ 분열문에 대한 이동 분석", 우리말연구, (59), pp.75~104 (2019), 우리말학회[DOI]
  44. 김선웅, "특정성과 서술성의 통사론: 영어와 한국어의 (‘것'-)분열문을 중심으로", 언어학, 18(3), pp.167~185 (2010), 대한언어학회[DOI]
  45. 김용범, "초점과 주제의 음성학적 관련성", 언어와 정보, 8(1), pp.27~52 (2004), 한국언어정보학회
  46. Kim, Young-Hee, "Ccokaynmwunuy kinungkwa thongsa (The function and the syntax of the cleft sentences)", The Korean language and literature, 69, pp.65~90 (2000)
  47. Lee, Jeong-Rae, "The Korean Internally Headed Relative Clause Construction: Its Morphological, Syntactic and Semantic Aspects", Doctor, pp.2006
  48. Lee, Kwang-Ho, "The meaning of locative case - marker {e}, {ese} and it`s syntagmatic phenomenon", Emwunhaknonchong, 3, pp.87~105 (1984), Kookmin University
  49. 이남근, "한국어 분열구문의 유형과 특성: HPSG 분석", 언어연구, 25(1), pp.25~38 (2008), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  50. 문숙영, "유형론의 관점에서 본 한국어의 ‘것’ 명사절", 國語學, (84), pp.33~88 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
  51. Mikkelson, Line, "Copular Clauses: Specificational, Predicational and Equation" (2005), Benjamin
  52. Mikkelsen, Line, "Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 2", pp.1805~1829 (2011), De Gruyter
  53. Moro, Adrea, "The Raising of the Predicates" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  54. Nam Kilim, "A Study on Modern Korean ‘ita(be)’ Construction" (2004), Hankwuk Mwunhwasa
  55. Nam, Ki-Shim, "Standard Korean Grammar" (1985), Top Publishing Company
  56. 오민석, "일부 ‘수식언’의 품사에 대하여 -‘맨’, ‘한’, ‘약(約)’, ‘총(總)’을 대상으로 -", 언어와언어학, (41), pp.105~126 (2008), 언어연구소
  57. Park,Myung-Kwan, "Subject-less Clefts in Korean : Towards a Deletion Analysis", 어학연구, 37(4) (2001), 언어교육원
  58. Park, Myung-Kwan, "Studies on Clefts in Modern Linguistics", pp.25~58 (2020), Global Contents
  59. 박나리, "‘-는 것이다’ 구문 연구 -문법기능과 담화기능 그리고 화자의 담화전략의 상관성을 중심으로-", 國語學, (65), pp.251~279 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
  60. Park, So-Young, "Tasks in Korean Text Science" (2001), Yeklak
  61. Park, So-Young, "The sytnactic structure of Korean clefts and the theory of ellipsis", Linguistics, 68, pp.35~57 (2014)
  62. 박소영, "‘이다’와 한국어 초점 구문에 대하여", 國語學, (71), pp.3~32 (2014), 국어학회[DOI]
  63. 박소영, "‘-기는’ 그리고 ‘-것은’ 분열문과 한국어의 외곽구조", 생성문법연구, 29(2), pp.235~258 (2019), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  64. Park, Yangkyu, "A study on the Locative Case in Korean", Master, pp.1972
  65. Prince, Ellen, "A comparison of wh-Clefts and it-clefts in discourse", Language, 54(4), pp.883~906 (1978)[DOI]
  66. Shin, Seon-Kyung, "On the ‘kesita’ construction", Journal of Korean Linguistics, 23, pp.119~158 (1993)
  67. Sohn, Keun-Won, "Non-sluicing, non-clefting approach to copular construction", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10(2), pp.267~294 (2000)
  68. Sohn, Keun-Won, "Postposition deletion in cleft constructions and the recoverability condition", Journal of Linguistic Association of Korea, 8(3), pp.139~153 (2000)
  69. 손근원, "Kes-clefts, Connectedness Effects, and the Implications Thereof", 생성문법연구, 14(4), pp.561~571 (2004), 한국생성문법학회
  70. Suh, Chung-Mok, "On the meaning of post-position ‘-seo’ in noun constructions", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 9(1), pp.155~186 (1984)
  71. Szabolcsi, Anna, "Formal Methods in the Study of Language", pp.513~541 (1981), Matematisch Centrum
  72. Woo, Soon-jo, "‘ita’wa ‘anita’uy sangkwanseng-phyoci kaynyemey uyhan pwunsek", Morphology, 2, pp.129~138 (2000)
  73. 윤항진, "The structure of kes-clefts and the syntactic status of kes in Korean", 생성문법연구, 18(3), pp.459~475 (2008), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  74. 윤항진, "Different Types of Kes Constructions in Korean", 생성문법연구, 22(3), pp.557~577 (2012), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  75. Yoon, James Hye Suk, "What the Korean copular reveals about the interaction of morphology and syntax", The 24th Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference (2002), University of California
  76. Yoon, James Hye Suk, "Clitic and Affix Combinations: Theoretical Perspectives", pp.239~283 (2005), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)