유형론의 관점에서 본 한국어의 품사
A Typological Approach to Korean Parts of Speech
1
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
In this paper we discussed Korean parts of speech in a typological perspective. Traditionally, Korean parts of speech have been analyzed in the grammatical framework of European languages as in the description of other linguistic areas. The typological approach, however, shows us that an individual language needs to be given a unique treatment with its own characteristic features in consideration. In this respect verbs and adjectives are considered to belong to the same category in Korean, though they function as a separate categories in European languages. The Korean conjunctive markers are realized as adpositions, verbal endings or other peripheral forms. Korean language has some typologically distinctive word classes such as ideophones and classifiers, while it lacks the category of articles, impersonal pronouns and the introductory particle, which are commonly found in European languages. We use the presence and lack of these categories in classifying languages into different subtypes in the typological approach.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김의수, "형식동사 ‘이다’의 문법", 어학연구, 38(3), pp.879~906 (2002), 언어교육원
- 목정수, "기능동사 ‘이다’ 구성의 쟁점", 22, pp.245~290 (1998)
- 목정수, "한국어 관형사와 형용사 범주에 대한 연구 ― 체계적 품사론을 위하여 ―", 언어학, 31, pp.71~100 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 시정곤, "구문과 통사적 접사설을 다시 논의함", 28, pp.55~80 (2005)
- 양경모, "일본어의 품사" (2003), 전남대 인문연
- 양정석, "‘이다’의 문법범주와 의미", 37(1), pp.337~366 (2001)
- 우순조, "활용 개념과 소위 '이다'와 관련된 오해들: 표지이론적 관점에서", 언어학, (44), pp.79~121 (2006), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 이광정, "국어품사분류의 역사적 발전에 대한 연구" (1987), 한신문화사
- 이정택, "관형사의 품사 설정 문제", 13, pp.167~187 (2003)
- 장영희, "국어 관형사의 범주와 기능", pp.201~220 (2001)
- Anward, J, "Parts of Speech", pp.726~735 (2001), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
- Baker, M, "Lexical Categories" (2003), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Beck, D., "The Typology of Parts of Speech Systems" (2002), New York: Routledge
- Bhat, "Criteria for Differentiation and Identification" (1994)
- Bhat, D. N. S, "Word Classes and Sentential Functions", pp.47~64 (2000), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
- Noun, "University of Cologne" (1987), Arbeittspapier des Klner Universalprojekts 67
- Broschart, J, "The Characteristics of Word Classes from a Crosslinguistic Perspective", pp.662~674 (2002), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
- Capell, "Verbal Syntax in Philippine Languages Philippine Journal of Science 93", pp.231~249 (1964)
- Croft, W., "Parts of Speech as Language Universals and as Language- Particular Categories", pp.65~102 (2000), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
- Dixon, "Studies in Language 1"
- Dixon, "and Other Essays in Semantics and Syntax" (1982), Mouton Publishers
- Gil, D, "Syntactic Categories, Cross-linguistic Variation and Universal Grammar", pp.173~216 (2000), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
- Heine B, "Adpositions in a Typological Perspective" (2004), Chonnam Univ
- Himmelmann, "Morphosyntax und Morphologie - Die Ausrichtungsaffixe im Tagalog" (1987)
- Hopper, "The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories Universal Grammar", pp.703~60 752 (1984)
- Hord, "The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology" (1986), Oxford University Press
- Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" (2002), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Maia, M, "Notes on Karaja Clause Structure" (2000)
- Rijkhoff, J, "When Can a Language Have Adjectives?", pp.217~257 (2000), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
- Schachter, "Parts of Speech System", pp.3~61, Cambridge University Press
- Scheerer, "On the Essential Difference between the Verbs of the European and the Philippine Languages Philippine Journal of Education 7", pp.1~10 (1924)
- Perlmutter, "Syntactic Argumentation and the Structure of English University of California Press" (1979)
- Stassen, L, "Intransitive Predication" (1997), Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Vogel, P., "Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes" (2000), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter