본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 관사에 대한 담화화용적 설명

A discourse-pragmatic account of English articles

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

English articles have been much discussed but still leave many examples of use or non-use unexplained. This paper starts from the observation that the definite article can be replaced by the indefinite article or unexpressed, in contrast to the general assumption that it is obligatory when the semantic condition of definiteness is satisfied. It argues that definiteness should be pragmatically redefined in terms of a speaker’s intention. It further argues that English articles, as part of referring expressions, are subject to various discourse and pragmatic principles. They do not have to be explicit if hearers can understand the reference in the discourse context without being guided by them, but speakers usually opt to express in a way hearers can understand the reference most clearly, according to the cooperative principle. Also, the roles of the articles are divided by a pragmatic division of labor when they share their meanings and can be alternated with each other. This kind of discourse-pragmatic approach tends to provide a more comprehensive account of English articles, better revealing their nature as referring expressions.

Abstract

English articles have been much discussed but still leave many examples of use or non-use unexplained. This paper starts from the observation that the definite article can be replaced by the indefinite article or unexpressed, in contrast to the general assumption that it is obligatory when the semantic condition of definiteness is satisfied. It argues that definiteness should be pragmatically redefined in terms of a speaker’s intention. It further argues that English articles, as part of referring expressions, are subject to various discourse and pragmatic principles. They do not have to be explicit if hearers can understand the reference in the discourse context without being guided by them, but speakers usually opt to express in a way hearers can understand the reference most clearly, according to the cooperative principle. Also, the roles of the articles are divided by a pragmatic division of labor when they share their meanings and can be alternated with each other. This kind of discourse-pragmatic approach tends to provide a more comprehensive account of English articles, better revealing their nature as referring expressions.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판부
  2. 이동준, "영어 관사 습득에 모국어가 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 박사, 영어영문학, pp.2010
  3. Abbot, Barbara, "Definiteness and identification in English", Pragmatics in 2000: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, pp.1~15 (2001), International Pragmatics Association
  4. Abbot, Barbara, "The difference between definite and indefinite descriptions", paper read at the annual LSA meeting (2003)
  5. Abbot, Barbara, "Issues in the semantics and pragmatics of definite descriptions in English, In Reference: Interdisciplinary perspectives", pp.61~72 (2008), Oxford University Press
  6. Abbot, Barbara, "The indefiniteness of definiteness, In Concept types and frames", Springer
  7. Bach, Emmon, "Informal lectures on formal semantics" (1989), State University of New York Press
  8. Carlson, Greg, "A unified analysis of the English bare plurals", Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, pp.413~457 (1977)
  9. Carlson, Greg, "Reference to kinds in English", 박사, pp.1977
  10. Celce-Murcia, Marianne, "The grammar book" (1999), Heinle & Heinle
  11. Cohen, Ariel, "Topic, focus, and the interpretation of bare plurals", Natural Language Semantics, 10(2), pp.125~165 (2002)
  12. Cowan, Ron, "The teacher’s grammar of English" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  13. Dulay, Heidi, "Language two" (1982), Oxford University Press
  14. Epstein, Richard, "Reference and definite referring expressions", Pragmatics and Cognitiion, 6, pp.189~207 (1998)
  15. Glasbey, Sheila, "I-level predicates that allow existential readings for BPs", Proceedings of SALT, 7, pp.169~179 (1998)
  16. Grice, H. Paul, "Logic and conversation", 석사, pp.1967
  17. Gundel, Jeanette K, "Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse", Language, 69(2), pp.274~307 (1993)
  18. Hawkins, John, "Definiteness and indefiniteness" (1978), Academic Press
  19. Hawkins, Joh, "On (in)definite articles: implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction", Journal of Linguistics, 27, pp.405~442 (1991)
  20. Huddleston, Rodney, "The cambridge grammar of the English language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  21. Ionin, Tania, "Article semantics in second language acquisition", 박사, pp.2003
  22. Ionin, Tania, "Specificity as a grammatical notion: evidence from L2 English article use", Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.245~258 (2003), Cascadilla Press
  23. Ionin, Tania, "Article semantics in L2 acquisition: the role of specificity", Language Acquisition, 12(1), pp.3~69 (2004)
  24. Kim, Jinsook., "A corpus-based study of English demonstratives this and that", Working papers in linguistics, 40(4), pp.1~17 (2009), Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii at Manoa
  25. 곽은주, "Subkind Readings of Noun Phrases with a Numeral", 영어영문학, 58(3), pp.491~517 (2012), 한국영어영문학회[DOI]
  26. Link, Godehard, "The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms, In Meaning, use, and interpretation of language", pp.302~323 (1983), de Gruyter
  27. Liu, Dilin, "Acquisition of the article the by nonnative speakers of English: an analysis of four nongeneric uses", Studies in second language acquisition, 24, pp.1~26 (2002)
  28. Ludlow, Peter, "On a unitary semantical analysis for definite and indefinite descriptions, In Descriptions and beyond: Semantic and pragmatic perspectives", pp.420~436 (2004), Oxford University Press
  29. Lyons, Christopher, "Definiteness" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  30. Master, Peter, "A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system", 박사, pp.1987
  31. Master, Peter, "Acquiring the two zero articles in English", paper presented at the Annual AAAL Conference (1997)
  32. Niimura, Tomomi, "Contrastive analysis of English and Japanese demonstratives from the perspective of L1 and L2 acquisition", Language Sciences, 18(3), pp.811~834 (1996)
  33. 노은주, "On Bare Plural Interpretations", 담화와 인지, 13(1), pp.69~90 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
  34. Russell, Bertrand., "On denoting", Mind, 14, pp.479~493 (1905)
  35. Szabo, Zoltan Gendler, "Descriptions and uniqueness", Philosophical Studies, 101, pp.29~57 (2000)
  36. Yule, George, "Explaining English grammar (Oxford handbooks for language teachers series)" (1998), Oxford University Press
  37. Zdorenko, Tatiana, "The role of the first language in child second language of articles", Proceedings of the Second Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), pp.483~490 (2007), Cascadilla Proceedings Project

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)