본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Cognitive Approach to the Meanings of the English Definite Article THE

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the English definite article under the framework of Cognitive Grammar (Langacker 1987, 1991a, 1991b, 2000). In the first place, I focused on the concept ‘cognitive domain’ proposed by Langacker (1987:147-182). According to the concept, almost all of the human speech acts can be conceptualized and schematized in human being’s cognitive domain. In order to facilitate the discussion of the data used in this paper, I employed some terminologies of my own creating. One of them is ‘cognitive bridge’. ‘Cognitive bridge’ is constructed by the speaker and then is built on the hearer’s cognitive domain. Its first role is to be used as a cognitive setting in which ‘the’ can be naturally used. In the middle of this paper, the scope of ‘cognitive bridge’ is enlarged to ‘speaker and hearer’s cognitive domain’, and later on, it can even be expanded to the marginal line of human being’s cognitive domain, finally leaving only ‘psychological boundary’ surrounding ‘the’. As the conceptualized or crystallized meaning in CG can be placed on the very top of every possible linguistic output, so the newly established superschema of 'the' in this paper will play the role of a so called central circuit of different usages of ‘the’.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the English definite article under the framework of Cognitive Grammar (Langacker 1987, 1991a, 1991b, 2000). In the first place, I focused on the concept ‘cognitive domain’ proposed by Langacker (1987:147-182). According to the concept, almost all of the human speech acts can be conceptualized and schematized in human being’s cognitive domain. In order to facilitate the discussion of the data used in this paper, I employed some terminologies of my own creating. One of them is ‘cognitive bridge’. ‘Cognitive bridge’ is constructed by the speaker and then is built on the hearer’s cognitive domain. Its first role is to be used as a cognitive setting in which ‘the’ can be naturally used. In the middle of this paper, the scope of ‘cognitive bridge’ is enlarged to ‘speaker and hearer’s cognitive domain’, and later on, it can even be expanded to the marginal line of human being’s cognitive domain, finally leaving only ‘psychological boundary’ surrounding ‘the’. As the conceptualized or crystallized meaning in CG can be placed on the very top of every possible linguistic output, so the newly established superschema of 'the' in this paper will play the role of a so called central circuit of different usages of ‘the’.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. "Research Club in Language Learning", pp.57~67 (1962)
  2. "Longman English grammar" (1994)
  3. "Determiners as heads", pp.317~337 (1991)
  4. "Essentials of English grammar" (1933)
  5. "Cognitive meanings of the Korean auxiliary verb -nayta", IX, pp.453~462 (2001), Cambridge: Harvard University Press
  6. "Transformational grammar and language teaching", ann arbor (1969)
  7. "Foundations of cognitive grammar Vol" (1991), Stanford University Press
  8. "Grammar and conceptualization" (2000), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
  9. "Cognitive linguistics:An introduction" (2002), Oxford:Oxford University Press
  10. "A handbook of English grammar", Longmans
  11. "Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  12. "Essence English-Korean Dictionary" (1998), Minjoongseorim. Seoul. Korea
  13. "Macmillan English Dictionary" (2002), Macmillan Publishers Limited
  14. "New Ace English-Korean Dictionary" (1990), Keumsung Press. Seoul. Korea
  15. "Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary" (2000), Oxford University Press
  16. "Random House Webster's College Dictionary" (1997), New York. Random House Inc

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)