본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

제조기업의 사회자본이 공급사슬 관계 성과에 미치는 영향

The Impact of Social Capital of Manufacturing Companies on Relationship Performance

노혜영
한국산업경영시스템학회 (KOREAN SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING)|2020.09|한국산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)|제43권 제3호|pp. 143-155|DOI 10.11627/jkise.2020.43.3.143

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Social capitalCommitmentSupply chainRelationship performance
주제분류산업공학

초록

The relationship between companies in the supply chain is a core competency of the company and key indicator which determines the survival of a company. Therefore, companies are investing in efforts for inter-company relations, and related studies have been conducted for a long time. However, in the supply chain, the positions and characteristics of suppliers and buyers are not the same. Therefore, research is needed to better understand and respond to other characteristics of the relationship between suppliers and buyers. The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics of the resources held between the buyer and the supplier through social capital, which is a value asset that can be used as a resource created through social relations, and whether it affects the commitment of the relationship. In addition, The core of this study was to statistically analyze the differences between suppliers and buyers through this analysis. This study was conducted by surveying companies that are suppliers and buyers along the supply chain. The difference between the supplier and the buyer was revealed through empirical analysis, and statistically, the difference between the two groups was also revealed. As a result of the analysis, the higher the involvement of the buyer, the more significant the result of structural capital was, and the result was statistically opposite to the supplier. As for the relationship capital, quantitative and qualitative relationship capital had different effects on the commitment. Both the supplier and the buyer had a positive effect on relationship performance. However, the effect of emotional commitment on non-financial relationship performance has a greater degree of influence on suppliers, and it appears in statistical differences. This study revealed differences in the relationship between suppliers and buyers, and found that different investments and efforts were required for each group.

Abstract

The relationship between companies in the supply chain is a core competency of the company and key indicator which determines the survival of a company. Therefore, companies are investing in efforts for inter-company relations, and related studies have been conducted for a long time. However, in the supply chain, the positions and characteristics of suppliers and buyers are not the same. Therefore, research is needed to better understand and respond to other characteristics of the relationship between suppliers and buyers. The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics of the resources held between the buyer and the supplier through social capital, which is a value asset that can be used as a resource created through social relations, and whether it affects the commitment of the relationship. In addition, The core of this study was to statistically analyze the differences between suppliers and buyers through this analysis. This study was conducted by surveying companies that are suppliers and buyers along the supply chain. The difference between the supplier and the buyer was revealed through empirical analysis, and statistically, the difference between the two groups was also revealed. As a result of the analysis, the higher the involvement of the buyer, the more significant the result of structural capital was, and the result was statistically opposite to the supplier. As for the relationship capital, quantitative and qualitative relationship capital had different effects on the commitment. Both the supplier and the buyer had a positive effect on relationship performance. However, the effect of emotional commitment on non-financial relationship performance has a greater degree of influence on suppliers, and it appears in statistical differences. This study revealed differences in the relationship between suppliers and buyers, and found that different investments and efforts were required for each group.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Adler, P. S., "Social capital : Prospects for a new concept", Academy of Management Review, 27(1), pp.17~40 (2002)
  2. Allen, N. J., "Organizational socialization tactics : A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers’commitment and role orientation", Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), pp.847~858 (1990)
  3. Blau, P. M., "Justice in social exchange", Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), pp.193~206 (1964)
  4. Burt, R.S., "Structural holes : The social structure of competition" (2009), Harvard university press
  5. 차희원, "기업 커뮤니케이션 자본지수 개발 연구", 한국언론학보, 54(2), pp.57~86 (2010), 한국언론학회
  6. Choi, I. Y., "Study on the supply chain management success model and performance, measurement indicators", Journal of the Korea Society Industrial Information System, 10(2), pp.87~101 (2005)
  7. Cicourel, A.V., "Cognitive sociology : Language and meaning in social interaction", ~ (1974)
  8. Coleman, J.S., "Social capital in the creation of human capital", American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp.S95~S120 (1988)
  9. Dwyer, F. R., "Developing buyer-seller relationships", Journal of Marketing, 51(2), pp.11~27 (1987)
  10. Esser, H., "The two meanings of social capital" (2008), Oxford Univ. Press
  11. Giunopero, L. C., "Purchasing and supply management sustainability : Drivers and barriers", Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(4), pp.258~269 (2012)
  12. Gordon, L. A., "Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure : an empirical investigation", Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(1), pp.33~47 (1984)
  13. Griffith, D. A., "The influence of individual and firm level social capital of marketing managers in a firm’s global network", Journal of World Business, 39(3), pp.244~254 (2004)
  14. 한상린, "사회교환 이론을 중심으로 한 대기업과 중소기업 간의 장기적 동반성장 구축요인 연구", Korea Business Review, 17(4), pp.1~21 (2013), 한국경영학회
  15. Hult, G., "Organizational learning as a strategic resource in supply management", Journal of Operations Management, 21(5), pp.541~556 (2003)
  16. Hunt, S. D., "Organizational commitment : one of many commitments or key mediating construct?", Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), pp.1568~1587 (1994)
  17. 황기현, "The Relationship among TQM Practices, Employee Satisfaction and Employee Loyalty in ICT Customer Service and Retail Distribution Organizations", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 38(1), pp.188~198 (2015), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  18. Jacobs, J., "The Death and Life of Great American Cities" (1961), Book Unpublished resources
  19. 진홍, "구매자와 공급자의 관계강도가 협력 및 관계성과에 미치는 영향", 글로벌경영학회지, 9(4), pp.21~39 (2012), 글로벌경영학회[DOI]
  20. 정갑연, "대기업과 중소기업 간 사회화 과정 및 관계자본이 상생협력과 성과에 미치는 영향", 경영컨설팅연구, 19(1), pp.13~26 (2019), 한국경영컨설팅학회
  21. 김대철, "공급사슬관리 (SCM) 운영 변화의 저항에 영향을 미치는 선행요인 평가 : 식품제조 중소기업 K사 사례를 중심으로", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 42(3), pp.206~216 (2019), 한국산업경영시스템학회[DOI]
  22. 김광명, "중소기업의 기업가정신과 시장지향성이 재무적‧비재무적성과에 미치는 영향", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 16(10), pp.326~337 (2016), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  23. 김인호, "제품 및 공정 적합성과 기업성과와의 관계에 대한 실증연구", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 24(69), pp.23~35 (2001), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  24. 김종영, "경쟁환경의 불확실성이 결속, 신뢰 및 장기지향성에 미치는 영향 : 한․미․일 제조업체를 중심으로", 통상정보연구, 14(4), pp.251~271 (2012), 한국통상정보학회[DOI]
  25. 김상덕, "첨단산업의 환경동태성이 공급체인의 결속에 미치는 영향: 유연성과 의존성의 역할", Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구), 17(2), pp.31~54 (2007), 한국마케팅과학회
  26. 김상덕, "관계특유투자와 관계자본이 관계학습과 성과에 미치는 영향: 자원기반관점을 중심으로", 마케팅연구, 25(1), pp.81~106 (2010), 한국마케팅학회
  27. Lasher, D. R., "USAA-IBM partnerships in information technology : managing the image project", MIS Quarterly, 15(4), pp.551~565 (1991)
  28. 이돈희, "공급자-구매자 협력관계가 지속가능 SCM 활동에 미치는 영향", 한국산업정보학회논문지, 22(4), pp.97~115 (2017), 한국산업정보학회[DOI]
  29. Lee, D. J., "Importers’ benevolence toward their foreign export suppliers", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), pp.32~48 (2004)
  30. 이수열, "공급사슬의 사회적 자본, 그린 공급사슬관리, 공급사 성과의 관계에 대한 연구: 경로분석 모형", 한국생산관리학회지, 24(2), pp.239~259 (2013), 한국생산관리학회[DOI]
  31. 이태희, "기업 규모에 따른 공급사슬지향성과 공급사슬관리가 수출성과에 미치는 영향", 국제경영리뷰, 16(1), pp.243~273 (2012), 한국국제경영관리학회
  32. Mentzer, J. T., "Defining supply chain management", Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), pp.1~25 (2001)
  33. Meredith, W., "An essay on measurement and factorial invariance", Medical Care, 44(11), pp.69~77 (2006)
  34. Meredith, W., "Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance", Psychometrika, 58(4), pp.525~543 (1993)
  35. Nahapiet, J., "Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage", Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp.242~266 (1998)
  36. Palmatier R. W., "Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing : A meta-analysis", Journal of Marketing, 70(4), pp.136~153 (2006)
  37. 박찬권, "환경 불확실성이 공급사슬에서의 상호의존성과 관계결속에 미치는 영향", 한국SCM학회지, 18(2), pp.133~150 (2018), 한국SCM학회[DOI]
  38. 박찬권, "거래공정성, 거래진정성, 평판, 관계적 자본 간의 관계에 대한 연구", 물류학회지, 29(5), pp.35~48 (2019), 한국물류학회[DOI]
  39. 박정민, "공급기업과 제조기업의 협력관행에 관한 연구 : 산업환경과 성과와의 관계를 중심으로", 산업경제연구, 24(6), pp.3411~3432 (2011), 한국산업경제학회
  40. Ramaseshan, B., "Power, satisfaction, and relationship commitment in chinese storetenant relationship and their impact on performance", Journal of Retailing, 82(1), pp.63~70 (2006)
  41. Shin, H., "Supply management orientation and supplier", buyer performance, 2000, pp.18(3), 317~333
  42. Styles, C., "Export performance measures in Australia and the United Kingdom", Journal of International Marketing, 6(3), pp.12~36 (1998)
  43. Su, Q., "The impact of supply chain relationship quality on cooperative strategy", Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(4), pp.263~272 (2008)
  44. Tsai, W., "Social capital and value creation : The role of intrafirm networks", Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), pp.464~476 (1998)
  45. Venkatraman, N., "Planning system success : a conceptualization and an operational model", Management Science, 33(6), pp.687~705 (1987)
  46. Villena, V. H., "The dark side of buyer-supplier relationships : A social capital perspective", Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), pp.561~576 (2011)
  47. Wisner, J. D., "Principles of supply chain management : A balanced approach" (2014), Cengage
  48. Yoo, W. J., "An empirical study on the relationship between the extent of use of nonfinancial performance measurement and the financial performance under the environmental uncertainty", Review of Accounting and Policy Studies, 6(1), pp.111~139 (2001)
  49. 윤점홍, "공급기업의 관계마케팅 노력이 관계성과에 미치는 영향에 있어서 구매전략과 환경 동태성의 조절효과에 관한 연구", 대한경영학회지, 31(12), pp.2323~2347 (2018), 대한경영학회[DOI]
  50. 우종필, "경영학 분야에서 다중집단분석의 흐름에 대한 연구", 상품학연구, 35(4), pp.113~122 (2017), 한국상품학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

구매자-공급자간의 사회적 자본이 공급사슬의 교환 프로세스와 성과에 미치는 영향: 한국의 사회적 경제조직을 중심으로박상선, 안나현한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2016 · 제27권 제1호공급사슬환경에서 사회적 자본, 공급사슬 역량 및 성과 간의 구조적 관계김석규, 이현주, 조동혁한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2018 · 제29권 제1호공급사슬 구성원들 간 관계품질 측면에서의 만족 및 신뢰, 결속, 사회적 자본 간의 관계에 대한 연구김채복, 박성민, 박찬권한국로지스틱스학회 · 로지스틱스연구2018 · 제26권 제2호불확실한 환경의 영향에 따른 구매사와 공급사 관계 비교 연구김승철, 노혜영, 박소현한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2020 · 제31권 제3호공급사슬의 사회적 자본, 그린 공급사슬관리, 공급사 성과의 관계에 대한 연구: 경로분석 모형이경호, 이수열한국생산관리학회 · 한국생산관리학회지2013 · 제24권 제2호공급사슬 파트너십 속성의 구조적 관계에 대한 연구: 공급사슬 내 역할 및 거래기간을 중심으로김성수, 송상화한국중소기업학회 · 중소기업연구2016 · 제38권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)

미국 금리 스프레드를 이용한 한국 금리 스프레드 예측 모델에 관한 연구 : SVR-앙상블(RNN, LSTM, GRU) 모델 기반정순호, 송명진, 정윤재, 고성석, 김영후pp. 1-9색도 및 색순에 따른 그라비아 인쇄 공정의 작업 순서 결정 규칙배재호pp. 10-20후속시장이 가격결정에 미치는 영향 분석이민호, 조형래pp. 21-28산업구조와 가치사슬이 신흥국 진출 성공에 미치는 영향오재호, 박광호pp. 29-40수치실험을 통한 스트레스 감소 예방보수모형의 고찰박종훈pp. 41-52
원문 보기