Increasing Persona Effects: Does It Matter the Voice and Appearance of Animated Pedagogical Agent

키워드

참고문헌 (56)

1. Atkinson, R. K., "Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents", Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), pp.416~427 (2002)[DOI]
2. Atkinson, R. K., "Fostering social agency in multimedia learning : Examining the impact of an animated agent?s voice", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), pp.117~139 (2005)[DOI]
3. Bakdash, J. Z., "Large displays enhance spatial knowledge of a virtual environment", the Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization (2006)
4. Baylor, A. L., "The design of motivational agents and avatars", Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), pp.291~300 (2011)
5. Baylor, A. L., "Designing nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents : When less is more", Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), pp.450~457 (2009)[DOI]
6. A second chance to make a first impression? How appearance and nonverbal behavior affect perceived warmth and competence of virtual agents over time, "Bergmann, K.", Intelligent Virtual Agents, ~ (2012)
7. Cassell, J., "Embodied conversational agents" (2000), MIT Press
8. Danforth, D. R., "Development of virtual patient simulations for medical education", Journal For Virtual Worlds Research, 2(2) (2009)
9. de Melo, C. M., "The Impact of Emotion Displays in Embodied Agents on Emergence of Cooperation with People", Presence (Cambridge, Mass.), 20(5), pp.449~465 (2011)
10. Dehn, D. M., "The impact of animated interface agents : a review of empirical research", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(1), pp.1~22 (2000)[DOI]
11. Domagk, S., "Do Pedagogical Agents Facilitate Learner Motivation and Learning Outcomes?", Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 22(2), pp.84~97 (2010)[DOI]
12. Dunsworth, Q., "Fostering multimedia learning of science:Exploring the role of an animated agent’s image", Computers & Education, 49(3), pp.677~690 (2007)[DOI]
13. Frechette, C., "The roles of animated pedagogical agents'presence and nonverbal communication in multimedia learning environments", Journal of Media Psychology, 22(2), pp.61~72 (2010)[DOI]
14. Guadagno, R. E., "Social evaluations of embodied agents and avatars", Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), pp.2380~2385 (2011)[DOI]
15. Gulz, A., "Design of animated pedagogical agents-A look at their look", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(4), pp.322~339 (2006)[DOI]
16. Haake, M., "A look at the roles of look & roles in embodied pedagogical agents-A user preference perspective", International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19(1), pp.39~71 (2009)
17. Heidig, S., "Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning?", Educational Research Review, 6(1), pp.27~54 (2011)[DOI]
18. Heller, R., "Dynamic advancements in teaching and learning based technologies: New concepts", pp.66~78 (2011)
19. Hou, J., "Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players’ immersion tendencies on game experience", Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), pp.617~623 (2012)[DOI]
20. Johnson, A. M., "Animated agents in K-12engineering outreach: Preferred agent characteristics across age levels", Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), pp.1807~1815 (2013)[DOI]
21. Kartiko, I., "Learning science in a virtual reality application : The impacts of animated-virtual actors’ visual complexity", Computers & Education, 55(2), pp.881~891 (2010)[DOI]
22. Kim, C., "A virtual change agent: motivating pre-service teachers to integrate technology in their future classrooms", Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), pp.309~321 (2008)
23. Kim, Y., "Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions : The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction", Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3), pp.223~243 (2006)[DOI]
24. Kim, Y., "A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions", Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(6), pp.569~596 (2006)
25. Kim, Y., "The impact of learner attributes and learner choice in an agent-based environment", Computers & Education, 56(2), pp.505~514 (2011)[DOI]
26. Kuk, K., "Pedagogical agent in Multimedia Interactive Modules for Learning-MIMLE", Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), pp.8051~8058 (2012)[DOI]
27. Lee, J. -E. R., "Trust and technology in a ubiquitous modern environment: Theoretical and methodological perspectives", pp.1~15 (2010), IGI Global
28. Lee, K. M., "Presence, explicated", Communication Theory, 14(1), pp.27~50 (2004)
29. Lin, L., "Animated agents and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter?", Computers & Education, 67(0), pp.239~249 (2013)[DOI]
30. Mayer, R. E., "An Embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents", Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied, 18(3), pp.239~252 (2012)[DOI]
31. Mayer, R. E., "Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice", Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), pp.419~425 (2003)[DOI]
32. Mazikowski, A., "Image Projection in Immersive 3D Visualization Laboratory", Procedia Computer Science, 35(0), pp.842~850 (2014)[DOI]
33. Mikropoulos, T. A., "Educational virtual environments : A ten-year review of empirical research(1999-2009)", Computers & Education, 56(3), pp.769~780 (2011)[DOI]
34. Miksatko, J., "Intelligent Virtual Agents Vol. 6356", pp.475~481 (2010), Springer Berlin
35. Moreno, R., "Students’ choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning : A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), pp.186~207 (2006)[DOI]
36. Moreno, R., "Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments : Role of methods and media", Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), pp.598~610 (2002)[DOI]
37. Nass, C., "Machines and mindlessness : Social responses to computers", Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), pp.81~103 (2000)
38. Novielli, N., "User attitude towards an embodied conversational agent : Effects of the interaction mode", Journal of Pragmatics, 42(9), pp.2385~2397 (2010)[DOI]
39. Kamisah Osman, "IMPACT OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA MODULE WITH PEDAGOGICAL AGENTS ON STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING AND MOTIVATION IN THE LEARNING OF ELECTROCHEMISTRY", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), pp.395~421 (2014), Springer Nature[DOI]
40. Gamze Ozogul, "Investigating the impact of pedagogical agent gender matching and learner choice on learning outcomes and perceptions", Computers & Education, 67, pp.36~50 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
41. Chao Qu, "Conversations with a virtual human: Synthetic emotions and human responses", Computers in Human Behavior, 34, pp.58~68 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
42. Ruotolo, F., "Immersive virtual reality and environmental noise assessment : An innovative audio–visual approach", Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 41, pp.10~20 (2013)
43. Ryu, J., "The psychometric structure of pedagogical agent persona", Technology Instruction Cognition and Learning, 2, pp.291~314 (2005)
44. Sahimi, S. M., "The pedagogical agent in online learning : Effects of the degree of realism on achievement in terms of gender", Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(2), pp.175~185 (2010)
45. Schönbrodt, F. D., "The challenge of constructing psychologically believable agents", Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(2), pp.100~107 (2011)[DOI]
46. Stern, S. E., "Computer-synthesized speech and perceptions the social influence of disabled users", Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, pp.254~265 (2008)[DOI]
47. Stern, S. E., "Listeners’preference for computer-synthesized speech over natural speech of people with disabilities", Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(3), pp.289~297 (2014)[DOI]
48. Tien, L. T., "Pedagogical agents in interactive multimedia modules : Issues of variability", Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, pp.605~612 (2010)[DOI]
49. Tomoko Watanabe Traphagan, "Cognitive, social and teaching presence in a virtual world and a text chat", Computers & Education, 55(3), pp.923~936 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
50. H. van der Meij, "Motivating agents in software tutorials", Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), pp.845~857 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
51. van Vugt, H. C., "Realism is not all! User engagement with task-related interface characters", Interacting with Computers, 19(2), pp.267~280 (2007)[DOI]
52. Veletsianos, G., "How do learners respond to pedagogical agents that deliver social-oriented non-task messages? Impact on student learning, perceptions, and experiences", Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), pp.275~283 (2012)[DOI]
53. Veletsianos, G., "What Do Learners and Pedagogical Agents Discuss When Given Opportunities for Open-Ended Dialogue?", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(3), pp.381~401 (2013)
54. Wolff, S., "Carrot and stick 2.0: The benefits of natural and motivational prosody in computer-assisted learning", Computers in Human Behavior, 43, pp.76~84 (2015)[DOI]
55. Woo, H. L., "Designing multimedia learning environments using animated pedagogical agents : factors and issues", Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 25(3), pp.203~218 (2009)[DOI]
56. Zhao, G., "Learning-by-Teaching: Designing Teachable Agents with Intrinsic Motivation", Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), pp.62~74 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천