본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Social Risks of Self-Employed Women in Korea and the Legacy of East Asian Welfare Model Policy Logic

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Self-employed women are highly vulnerable to social risks like unemployment and poverty as job instability has increased in recent decades. Despite this, the Korean public policy focus has been on employees, not the self-employed. This may be closely linked to the legacy of the East Asian welfare model policy logic. Therefore, this study explores social risk levels by gender and employment status and examines the relation between social risks of self-employed women and the East Asian welfare model policy logic, through comparing-means analysis and ordered logit regression analysis using the 9th wave data of the Korea Welfare Panel Study Korea. The study yields evidence of divisions in social risk levels according to gender and employment status: that is, a gender difference, and a substantial gap between self-employed workers and regular employees. Furthermore, the findings of the study indicate that self-employed women — especially in small businesses — are more vulnerable to social risks than are self-employed men. This strongly supports the conclusion that the higher social risks of self-employed women in Korea are closely linked to the legacy of East Asian welfare model policy logic, which focuses on social protection for core workers and largely neglects women.

Abstract

Self-employed women are highly vulnerable to social risks like unemployment and poverty as job instability has increased in recent decades. Despite this, the Korean public policy focus has been on employees, not the self-employed. This may be closely linked to the legacy of the East Asian welfare model policy logic. Therefore, this study explores social risk levels by gender and employment status and examines the relation between social risks of self-employed women and the East Asian welfare model policy logic, through comparing-means analysis and ordered logit regression analysis using the 9th wave data of the Korea Welfare Panel Study Korea. The study yields evidence of divisions in social risk levels according to gender and employment status: that is, a gender difference, and a substantial gap between self-employed workers and regular employees. Furthermore, the findings of the study indicate that self-employed women — especially in small businesses — are more vulnerable to social risks than are self-employed men. This strongly supports the conclusion that the higher social risks of self-employed women in Korea are closely linked to the legacy of East Asian welfare model policy logic, which focuses on social protection for core workers and largely neglects women.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 안종순, "자영업자의 사회경제적 지위의 이질성과 사회적 위험대응의 계층 간 차이", 사회복지정책, 42(1), pp.239~264 (2015), 한국사회복지정책학회[DOI]
  2. 안종순, "Self-Employed Women’s Social Risks and Difference in Risk Responses by Labor Market Status", 여성경제연구, 13(2), pp.159~181 (2016), 한국여성경제학회
  3. Annink, A., "Work-family conflict among employees and the self-employed across Europe", pp.1~23 (2015), Social Indicators Research
  4. Aspalter, C., "The East Asian welfare model", International Journal of Social Welfare, 15, pp.290~301 (2006)
  5. Budig, M. J., "Intersections on the road to self-employment: Gender, family and occupational class", Social Forces, 84(4), pp.2223~2239 (2006)
  6. 최민정, "여성의 노동공급유형 및 임금결정요인 분석: 임금근로와 자영업 간 비교", 사회복지정책, 42(3), pp.107~133 (2015), 한국사회복지정책학회
  7. Coming to a standstill? A new theoretical idea of East Asian welfare regimes, "Choi, Y. J.", Department of Social Policy and Social Work, Barnett House, ~, pp.Barnett Papers in Social Research no. 3 (2007)
  8. 정무권, "위험사회론과 사회적 위험의 역동성: 사회적 위험의 거시적 연구를 위한 비판적 검토", 한국사회와 행정연구, 23(2), pp.195~224 (2012), 서울행정학회
  9. Jörg Michael Dostal, "The Developmental Welfare State and Social Policy: Shifting From Basic to Universal Social Protection", The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 25(3), pp.147~172 (2010), 서울대학교행정대학원
  10. "Self-employed workers to gain maternity and pension benefits under new EU law" (2010)[URL]
  11. "Self-employed workers: equal treatment between men and women" (2015)[URL]
  12. Gimenez-Nadal, "Self-employed mothers and the work-family conflict", Applied Economics, 44(17), pp.2133~2147 (2015)
  13. Hong, I., "Trends and determinants of social expenditure in Korea, Japan and Taiwan", Social Policy & Administration, 48(6), pp.647~665 (2014)
  14. Hundley, G, "Male", Female earnings differences in self-employment: The effects of marriage, children, and the household division of labor, 2000, pp.54(1), 95~114
  15. Hundley, G, "Domestic division of labor and self", organizationally employed differences in job attitudes and earnings, 2001, pp.22(2), 121~139
  16. "LABORSTA internet" (2015)[URL]
  17. "Handbook on the extension of social security coverage to the self-employed" (2012)[URL]
  18. "The study of resolution of the blind spot in maternity protection and redesigning maternity protection scheme for improving the employment" (2014)[URL]
  19. 진미정, "기혼 취업여성의 종사상 지위에 따른 일‧가족 전이:자영업자, 무급가족종사자, 임금근로자의 비교", 한국가정관리학회지, 33(5), pp.25~35 (2015), 한국가정관리학회
  20. 강세영, "소규모 자영업의 성별 사회경제적 제약조건", 가족과 문화, 17(3), pp.49~83 (2005), 한국가족학회
  21. "Social protection for self-employed workers" (2013)[URL]
  22. Kim, Bok-soon, "Job trends and implications for self-employed workers in small businesses since the economic crisis", Labor Review, 3, pp.12~24 (2009), Korea Labor Institute
  23. 김인춘, "Developments and Characteristics of Gender Politics in South Korea: A Comparative Perspective", Korea Observer, 43(4), pp.557~586 (2012), 한국학술연구원
  24. Kim, Woo yung, "The analysis of male-female difference in self-employment rates in Korea", Korean Journal of Labor Economics, 24(2), pp.1~34 (2001)
  25. 김우영, "근로자의 이질성과 자영업 선택에 관한 실증분석 - 임금근로에서 자영업으로의 진입을 중심으로-", 노동경제논집, 36(2), pp.1~36 (2013), 한국노동경제학회
  26. "Towards a comprehensive welfare state in South Korea:Institutional features, new socio-economic and political pressures, and the possibility of the welfare state" (2006)[URL]
  27. Kim, Yeon-Myung, "Beyond East Asian welfare productivism in South Korea", Policy & Politics, 36(1), pp.109~125 (2008)
  28. Female labor market changes and future strategies since 2000s: Focusing on the decrease of self-employed women, "Kim, Young-ok", Korea Women’s Development Institute, ~, pp.working paper no. 8 (2011)
  29. Korea Labor Institute, "The employment decrease of self-employed women in small businesses", Labor Review, pp.84~85 (2009)
  30. "Korea Welfare Panel Study user guide: The 9th wave" (2015)[URL]
  31. "Korea Welfare Panel Study purpose" (2016)[URL]
  32. "Statistics Korea" (2016)[URL]
  33. 이곤수, "사회적 위험과 위기대응적 사회정책의 평가:AHP를 이용한 상대적 중요도 분석", 한국사회와 행정연구, 21(2), pp.193~214 (2010), 서울행정학회
  34. A study on the work-family balance among self-employed and micro-business women in Kyeonggi province: Current status and policy support measure, "Lee, Jungui", Gyeonggido Family & Women’s Research Institute, ~, pp.Working paper no. 2012-26 (2012)
  35. A study of self-employment labor market Ⅱ: Labor market policy and social security, "Lee, Sung-ryeol", Korea Labor Institute, ~, pp.Working Paper no. 2009-07 (2009)
  36. Lee, Sam-sik, "Childbirths among self-employed households: What are the policy implications?", Health and Welfare Forum, 194, pp.34~47 (2012)
  37. A study of parental insurance model development for improving working parents’ child rearing conditions, "Lee, Sam-sik", Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, ~, pp.Working Paper no. 2013-69 (2013)
  38. "Public expenditure and participant stocks on LMP. OECD Statistics" (2015)[URL]
  39. 박찬웅, "The Divergent Paths of the East Asian Welfare Regimes : The Effects of Production Regimes and Democratization", Korean Social Science Journal, 34(1), pp.39~70 (2007), 한국사회과학협의회
  40. A study of the living status of the self-employed to respond to the low fertility and aging. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, "Park, Jong-seo", ~, pp.Working Paper no. 2-12-47-31 (2012)
  41. Robson, M., "Explaining cross-national variations in entrepreneurship: The role of social protection and political culture", Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 28(4), pp.863~892 (2012)
  42. 서동희, "새로운 사회적 위험과 사각지대의 여성복지", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 9(3), pp.320~328 (2009), 한국콘텐츠학회
  43. Taylor-Gooby, P., "New risks, new welfare: The transformation of the European welfare state", pp.1~28 (2004), Oxford UP
  44. Whelan, C. T., "Social class variation in risk: A comparative analysis of the dynamics of economic vulnerability", The British Journal of Sociology, 59(4), pp.637~659 (2008)
  45. Won, S., "A Confucian war over childcare?: Practice and policy in childcare and their implications for understanding the Korean gender regime", Social Policy and Administration, 38(3), pp.270~289 (2004)
  46. Yoon, Hong-sik, "New social risks and tasks of Korean social welfare: An approach from the private (family) area", The Korean Academy of Social Welfare 2006Autumn Conference (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)