한국의 사회적 위험과 여성: 가족위험 및 노동시장 위험을 중심으로
Social Risk and Women in Korea - A Study on Family Risks and labor Market risks -
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As the world became a post-industrial society, the risk spectra became wider due to new diffusible risks, so social risks came to spread beyond the borders of space and time. Women are at a social disadvantage, so they expose themselves to more dangerous risks than other groups. Unlike in the past, women's status has dramatically changed due to the weakening of patriarchy, the increasing number of women receiving higher education and participating in the labor market, and legal changes. These changes have elevated women's status in society; however, women continue to live in a sexist climate due to a persistent patriarchal culture and the current neo-liberal economy. Despite the increase of women householders and women's economic activity, most of them are engaged in irregular and low-income jobs, and are also caught in a conflict between their work and family because of gender role stereotypes. Women are in a group which holds high risks by the social insurance based on a full-time workforce. Given these circumstances, women ought to be placed in a genderized structure and the differences among women should be shown. The study, therefore, analyzes social risks and women's status especially by dividing the social risks into the experiences of risk, coping risk, deprivation of risk management, etc. and women's status into dimensions of stratification and gender. It, furthermore, examines through empirical study which of the two dimensions is a more influential factor for women's risks. The results of the research are as follows; first, the analysis of the difference among women groups showed that the older the woman is and the lower her income and class-identifying status is, the higher the experience of risk and deprivation of risk management is. Second, in coping risk, men scored higher than women, while in experience men scored higher than women. In this respect it is necessary to design a risk management program in connection with the dimensions of stratification and gender, and to systematically ensure that women's status is not degraded from the risk caused by overlapping gender to class for women's escaping from the risks.
Abstract
As the world became a post-industrial society, the risk spectra became wider due to new diffusible risks, so social risks came to spread beyond the borders of space and time. Women are at a social disadvantage, so they expose themselves to more dangerous risks than other groups. Unlike in the past, women's status has dramatically changed due to the weakening of patriarchy, the increasing number of women receiving higher education and participating in the labor market, and legal changes. These changes have elevated women's status in society; however, women continue to live in a sexist climate due to a persistent patriarchal culture and the current neo-liberal economy. Despite the increase of women householders and women's economic activity, most of them are engaged in irregular and low-income jobs, and are also caught in a conflict between their work and family because of gender role stereotypes. Women are in a group which holds high risks by the social insurance based on a full-time workforce. Given these circumstances, women ought to be placed in a genderized structure and the differences among women should be shown. The study, therefore, analyzes social risks and women's status especially by dividing the social risks into the experiences of risk, coping risk, deprivation of risk management, etc. and women's status into dimensions of stratification and gender. It, furthermore, examines through empirical study which of the two dimensions is a more influential factor for women's risks. The results of the research are as follows; first, the analysis of the difference among women groups showed that the older the woman is and the lower her income and class-identifying status is, the higher the experience of risk and deprivation of risk management is. Second, in coping risk, men scored higher than women, while in experience men scored higher than women. In this respect it is necessary to design a risk management program in connection with the dimensions of stratification and gender, and to systematically ensure that women's status is not degraded from the risk caused by overlapping gender to class for women's escaping from the risks.
참고문헌 (41)
- Abbott. D, "Risk in Social Science", pp.228~249 (2006), Oxford University Press
- An, J. O., "Risk Society, Risk Politics", pp.41~75 (2010), Seoul National University Press
- Anthony Giddens, "The consequences of modernity" (1997), Minyoungsa
- Association of Korean Industrial Sociology, "Socioligy" (2005), HanUl Academy
- 배은경, "‘경제 위기’와 한국 여성 ─ 여성의 생애전망과 젠더", 계급의 교차 ─, 2009, pp.9(2), 39~82[DOI]
- 백승호, "서비스경제와 한국사회의 계급, 그리고 불안정 노동 분석", 한국사회정책, 21(2), pp.57~90 (2014), 한국사회정책학회
- Chichilnisky, G., "Catastrophic Risks : the need for new tools, financial Instruments and institutions" (2006)
- "Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women"[URL]
- Esping-Andersen, Gosta, "The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism" (1990), Polity Press
- Gender and risk in the design of social protection intervention, "Ezemenari Kene", World Bank Institute, ~ (2002)
- Gallie. D, "Unemployment and life satisfaction: A cross-cultural comparison", European Journal of Sociology, 7(2), pp.248~280 (1998)
- G. Esping, "Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies" (2006), SungKyunKwan University Press
- Giddens. A., "Sociology" (2009), Polity Press
- Hacker. J., "The Great Risk Shift: The new Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Guidelines for assessing the source of risk and vulnerability, "Heitzmann, K", The World Bank, ~, pp.Social Protection Discussion Paper Series No.0218 (2002)
- Holzmann. R, "Social risk management: A new conceptual framework for social protection, and beyon", International Tax and Public Finance, 8(4), pp.529~556 (2001)
- 김은하, "여성 가구주 가구의 사회적 배제 위험 양상", 사회보장연구, 30(3), pp.31~58 (2014), 한국사회보장학회
- Kim, M. S., "Attitudes towards Social Risks in Korea" (2014), Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs
- Kim, S. H., "Women’s employment and time jobs selective agent", Welfare Trends, 191, pp.31~35 (2014)
- 김영순, "영국의 사회투자국가 실험 - 이념, 정책, 성과와 한국에", 사회보장연구, 23(3), pp.171~200 (2007), 한국사회보장학회
- Informal sector size and status, "Kim, Y. S.", Korea Labour & Society Institute, ~, pp.KLSI Issue paper 2014-77 (2014)
- 2014 The Korean Longitudinal Survey of Welfare Report, "Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs", ~ (2015)
- 2013 Introduction of the Korean Longitudinal Survey of Women and Families, "Korean Women’s Development Institute", ~ (2013)
- 2013 Women In Korea : Gender Statistics, "Korean Women’s Development Institute", ~ (2014)
- 2011 Korea Human Rights Report, "Lawyers for a Democratic Society", ~ (2011)
- Lee, J. Y., "Risk society and social construction of risk. Risk Society, Risk Politics", pp.1~40 (2010), Seoul National University Press
- Ministry of Gender Equality ＆ Family, "Career break women‘s economic activity status", Meet Happiness, 55, pp.8~9 (2014)
- Nam, E. Y., "New Social Risk", 2009 International conference of the Korean sociological association. Prospect of Public Society in Korean, pp.957~976 (2009)
- Oppenheimer, K, "Gender and Family Change in Industrized Countries" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Economically active population survey supplementary survey, "Statistics Korea", ~ (2014)
- Taylor-Gooby. P., "Pervasive uncertainty in second modernity", Sociological Research online, 10(4), pp.1~12 (2005)
- Taylor-Gooby. P., "New social risks in post-industrial society", International Social Security Review, 57(3), pp.45~64 (2005)
- Thakur, R, "United Nations ‘policy’ : An argument with three illustrations", International Studies Perspectives, 10(1), pp.18~35 (2009)
- Townsend, P., "Deprivation", Journal of Social Policy, 16(2), pp.125~146 (1987)
- U Suk Kyun, "Risky medical marketization as mad cow disease", Monthly Community Participation, 139, pp.16~19 (2008)
- Ulrich Beck., "Emancipatory catastrophism: What does it mean to climate change and risk society?", The Seoul Conference 2014. Joongmin Foundation for Social Theory (2014)
- Wang, Lillian Lih-rong, "Risk and Public Policy in East Asia", pp.107~114 (2010), ASHGATE
- Zygmunt Bauman, "Liquid Modernity" (2005), Gang Publishing Group
- Paul Nolte, "Riskante Moderne : Die Deutschen und der Neue Kapitalismus" (2008), Hanul Publishing Group
- Paul Nolte, "National security consciousness survey for social security index development" (2005), National Emergency Management Agency
- "Paul Nolte" (2006)[URL]