사회불안집단에서 연설 수행 시연 효과: 인지적 처리과정을 중심으로
The Effect of Speech Performance in Social Anxiety Groups : Centering on Cognitive Processes
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
사회불안집단의 인지적 편향은 주의, 해석 및 기억과 같은 인지적 과정의 핵심 영역에서 다양한 경험적 연구가 이 루어지고 있다. 기존 연구들에서 사회불안집단의 주의 및 해석 편향은 비교적 일관되게 나타난 반면, 기억 편향의 결과들은 일관되지 않았다. 사회불안집단의 특정 정보처리 과정의 결함을 이해하기 위해서는 인지적 편향을 유발 하는 과정에 초점을 맞춰야 한다. 이에 따라 최근 연구들은 지각, 주의 그리고 장기 기억의 영역들을 연결하는 작 업 기억의 역할과 과정에 대해 주목하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 주의, 해석, 기억의 인지적 영역에서 나타난 사회불 안집단의 인지적 편향이 작업 기억의 영역에서도 동일하게 나타나는지 경험적으로 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 20대 성인 남녀 423명을 대상으로 사회공포증척도(SPS)와 한국판 역학연구센터 우울 척도(CES-D)를 실시하여 ‘사회불안집단’ 20명, ‘정상통제집단’ 20명을 구성하였다. 본 연구의 타당성을 높이기 위해 연구 참여자들을 연설 수행이라는 실제 사회적 수행 상황에 노출시켰다. 연설 수행 전후로 숫자 역순 외우기 검사와 코르시 블록 검사로 구성된 작업 기억 과제와 자기보고식 설문지를 실시하여 연설 수행이 집단 간 작업 기억과 부정적 자기지각에 어 떠한 차이를 보이는지 밝혔다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 사회불안집단과 정상통제집단의 작 업 기억 과제 수행에서 집단 간 차이가 존재하지 않았다. 둘째, 연설 수행 전 후 상태 사회적 자기 효능감(SSES-S) 의 수준에서 각 집단 별 유의미한 차이가 확인되었다. 셋째, 연설 수행 이후 사회불안 수준에 따라 해석편향에서 차이가 확인되었다.
Abstract
The cognitive bias of social anxiety groups is being conducted in various empirical studies in the key areas of cognitive processes such as attention, interpretation and memory. While previous studies have shown relatively consistent attention and interpretation bias in social anxiety groups, the results of memory bias have been inconsistent. In order to understand the deficiencies of certain information processing processes in social anxiety groups, the focus should be on the process that causes cognitive bias. Accordingly, recent studies have focused on the role and process of working memory connecting areas of perception, attention, and long-term memory. In this study, we wanted to examine empirically whether the cognitive bias of social anxiety groups in the cognitive realm of attention, interpretation and memory is the same in the realm of working memory. To that end, 423 adult males and females in their 20s were divided into 20 “social anxiety groups” and 20 “normal control groups” by conducting social anxiety scale (SPS) and the Korean version of the Center for Epidemiological Research (CES-D). In order to make this study more relevant, the particpants were exposed to the actual social performance of the speech. Before and after the speech, a task memory task consisting of a numerical reverse memorization test and a Corsy block test and a self-reporting questionnaire were conducted to reveal how the speech performance differed between group working memory and negative self-awareness. In summary, the results of this study are as follows. First, there were no group differences in the performance of task memory for social anxiety groups and normal control groups. Second, significant differences between groups were identified at the level of state social self-efficiency (SSES-S) before and after the speech. Third, differences in interpretation bias were identified depending on the level of social unrest after the speech was carried outi
참고문헌 (36)
- Amir, Nader, "Suppression of the emotional Stroop effect by increased anxiety in patients with social phobia", Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(11), pp.945~948 (1996)
- Amir, N., "Working memory capacity in generalized social phobia", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(2), pp.504~509 (2011)
- Askew, Chris, "Vicarious Learning of Children's Social-Anxiety-Related Fear Beliefs and Emotional Stroop Bias", Emotion, 15(4), pp.501~510 (2015)
- Baddeley, A., "The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), pp.417~423 (2000)
- Baddeley, A. D., "Is working memory still working", European Psychologist, 7(2), pp.85~97 (2002)
- Baddeley, A., "Working memory; looking back and looking forward", Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), pp.829~839 (2003)
- Baddeley, A. D., "Working memory", Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, pp.47~89 (1974)
- Baddeley, A., "Investigating the episodic buffer", Psychologica Belgica, 50(3), pp.223~243 (2010)
- Birk, J. L., "Threat facilitates subsequent executive control during anxious mood", Emotion, 11(6), pp.1291~1304 (2011)
- Chatham, C. H., "Multiple gates on working memory", Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 1, pp.23~31 (2015)
- Chatham, C. H., "From an executive network to executive control: a computational model of the n-back task", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), pp.3598~3619 (2011)
- Coles, M. E., "Recognition bias for critical faces in social phobia: a replication and extension", Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(1), pp.109~120 (2005)
- Darke, S., "Anxiety and working memory capacity", Cognition and Emotion, 2(2), pp.145~154 (1988)
- Ecker, U. K. H., "The components of working memory updating: an experimental decomposition and individual differences", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, pp.170~189 (2010)
- Eysenck, M. W., "Anxiety and cognitive-task performance", Personality and Individual Differences, 6(5), pp.579~586 (1985)
- Eysenck, M. W., "Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory", Cognition and Emotion, 6, pp.409~434 (1992)
- Eysenck, M. W., "Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(2), pp.144~150 (1991)
- Eysenck, M. W., "Anxiety and cognitive performance:Attentional control theory", Emotion, 7, pp.336~353 (2007)
- Foa, E. B., "Memory bias in generalized social phobia: Remembering negative emotional expressions", Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 14(5), pp.501~519 (2000)
- Harrington, J. A., "Ruminative thoughts and their relation to depression and anxiety", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, pp.465~485 (2002)
- K. Lira Yoon, "Working memory in social anxiety disorder: better manipulation of emotional versus neutral material in working memory", Cognition and Emotion, 31(8), pp.1733~1740 (2017)
- Kocovski, N. L., "Ruminative coping and post-event processing in social anxiety", Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, pp.973~984 (2005)
- Luck, S. J., "Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), pp.391~400 (2013)
- Ma, W. J., "Changing concepts of working memory", Nature Neuroscience, 17(3), pp.347~356 (2014)
- Matt R. Judah, "Working memory load moderates late attentional bias in social anxiety", Cognition & Emotion, 27(3), pp.502~511 (2013)
- MacLeod, C., "Individual differences in anxiety and the restriction of working memory capacity", Personality and Individual Differences, 15, pp.163~173 (1993)
- MacNamara A., "Working memory load and negative picture processing: Neural and behavioral associations with panic, social anxiety and positive affect", Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3(4), pp.303~404 (2018)
- Miyake, A., "The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis", Cognitive Psychology, 41, pp.49~100 (2000)
- Mogg, K., "Selective attention to angry faces in clinical social phobia", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113(1), pp.160~165 (2004)
- Nortje, C., "Scores on an Emotional Stroop Task After Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder", Psychological Reports, 111(2), pp.461~472 (2012)
- Pe, M. L., "Executive well-being: Updating of positive stimuli in working memory is associated with subjective well-being", Cognition, 126(2), pp.335~340 (2013)
- Rapee, R. M, "A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia", Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(8), pp.741~756 (1997)
- Repovš, G., "The multi-component model of working memory; explorations in experimental cognitive psychology", Neuroscience, 139(1), pp.5~21 (2006)
- Roy P. C. Kessels, "The Backward Span of the Corsi Block-Tapping Task and Its Association With the WAIS-III Digit Span", 15(4), pp.426~434 (2008), Sage Publications
- Segal, A., "Updating the emotional content of working memory in social anxiety", Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 48, pp.110~117 (2015)
- Yu-Ni, L., "Cognitive Characteristics and Parenting stress according to Surgery Treatment on the Children with Neurosurgical Diseases", The Journal of the Korean Association of Psychotherapy, 6(2), pp.49~62 (2014)
