사도행전 오순절 방언과 현대 방언이 동일한 방언이었을 가능성 연구 : 사도행전 2장과 고린도전서 12장을 중심으로

Abstract

Modern Christians have an interest in Pneumatology after Christology, and they talk a lot about the Holy Spirit. However, in reality, the concept of the Holy Spirit is ambiguous, and it is more confused in the theory of spiritual gift. The Pneumatology, as thought by the Presbyterians, differs from that of the Pentecostal church members, just as the Holy Spirit exists in two ways. At the heart of this problem is the theology of spiritual gift, and in particular, different ideas about the spiritual gift of tongue intensify this confusion. Thus, this paper attempts to find out whether the tongue of Acts of the Apostles 2 and the tongue of 1 Corinthians 12 are indeed different. If this problem is solved, we will have a more consistent view of the theory of spiritual gift and even the Pneumatology. Therefore, this paper tries to show that the notion of tongue which most of the commentators and Reformed theologians alleged so far is wrong. Furthermore, I would like to suggest the possibility that pentecostal tongue of the Early Church and the modern tongue are the same tongue. When acknowledging this fact, the two camps will be able to reconcile with the new perspective on the theory of spiritual gift.